Auditing quality of care in the intensive care unit

  • D. Reis Miranda
Conference paper


Case In a university hospital, the full-time dedicated medical director (MD) of the surgical ICU (SICU) is an anaesthesiologist who specialized in intensive care medicine. Since about 20 years ago, the MD has faced an increasing amount of clinical and administrative work, at the same time there is a chronic shortage of medical staff, resulting in his frequent enrolment in the 24-h coverage of the unit. Due to the work overload, he is often too demanding of the nursing staff. The major problem, however, is the conflict (on clinical grounds and concerning areas of competence in the ICU) with the head of the Department of Anaesthesia, and often with surgeons.


Continuous Quality Improvement Audit Quality Rule Structure Internal Audit Governance Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (2000) Institute of Internal Auditors, Altamonte Springs, Florida, USA ( Scholar
  2. 2.
    Government Auditing Standards (1999) The United States General Accounting Office. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reis Mkanda D, Ryan DW, Schaufeli WB, Fidler V (eds) (1998) Organisation and management of intensive care. A prospective study in 12 european countries. Springer VerlagGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reis Miranda D, Moreno R (1997) Intensive care unit models and their role in management and utilization programs. Curr Opin Crit Care, 3:183–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reis Miranda D, Rijk A de, Schaufeli W (1996) Simplified therapeutic intervention scoring system: the TISS-28 items – results from a multi center study. Crit Care Med 24:64–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reis Miranda D, Moreno R, Iapichino G (1997) Nine equivalents of nursing manpower use score (NEMS). Intensive Care Med 23:760–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reis Mhanda D, Nap RE, De Rijk A, et al (2002) Nursing Activities Score (NAS). Crit Care Med (accepted for publication)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reis Miranda D (2002) Complications and adverse events. In: Ridley S (ed) Outcomes in critical care. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, pp 183–201Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moreno R, Reis Miranda D (1998) Nursing staff in intensive care in Europe: the mismatch between planning and practice. Chest 113:752–758PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Reis Miranda

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations