Critical care medicine in South America

  • J. Besso
  • A. Martinelli
Conference paper


The development of medical science and the delivery of medical care in South America is highly related to the physical demographic and social environment. Knowledge of these factors is a necessary prerequisite to understand and evaluate the quality of medical care [1].


Intensive Care Unit National Society South American Country Intermediate Care Unit Primary Specialty 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    NIH Consensus Development Conference on Critical Care Medicine (1983) Crit Care Med 11: 466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Artucio H, Mazza N (1992) International perspectives on critical care: South America. In: Hall JB, Schmidt GA, Wood LDH (eds) Principles of critical care. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Green J (1991) Intensive care unit studies. Med Heathc 21Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Randolph AG, Guyalt GH, Carlet J (1998) Understanding articles comparing outcomes among intensive care units to rate quality of care. Evidence based medicine in critical care group. Crit Care Med 26:773–781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Terzi RGG, Gallesio AO, Pacin J (1997) Critical care in South America: the new tradition. Crit Care Med 377–387Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Terzi RGG (1996) Medicina intensiva: Meia especialidade (editorial). Rev Bras Terap Intens 8:3Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Terzi RGG (1992) Residencia medica en terapia intensiva (editorial). Rev Bras Terap Intens 4:4Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knaus W/A, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1986) Evaluation of outcome from intensive care in mayor medical center. Ann Intern Med 104:410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kaplan V, Angus DC (2002) Surviving intensive care. Crit Care Med 3:703–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    NIH Consensus Development Conference Statement on CCM in Mayor Isues in Critical Care Medicine (1984) JE Parillo, SM Ayres (eds) Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 227–289Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Task Force on Guidelines of the SCCM recommendations for Intensive Care Unit Admission and Discharge Criteria (1988) Crit Care Med 16:807–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weil MH, Weil CJ, Rackow EC (1988) Guide to ethical decision making for the critically: the three R’s and Q C. Crit Care Med 16:636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bastos PG, Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, et al (1996) The importance of technology for achieving superior outcomes from intensive care. Intensive Care Med 22: 664PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gallesio AO () Acreditation en areas de medicina crítica. In: Boletín de la Federación Panamericana e Ibérica de Medicina Crítica.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Knibel MF (1991) A Terapia intensiva no Brasil: importancia do IV congreso panamericano e iberico. Rev Bras Terap Intens 3:3Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sachdeva RC, Guntapalli KK (1999) International comparisons of outcome in intensive care units. Crit Care Med 9:2032–2033CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Besso
  • A. Martinelli

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations