Advertisement

CFD Simulation of Stirred Vessel Reactors

  • A. Brucato
  • F. Grisafi
  • G. Micale
  • L. Rizzuti
Conference paper

Abstract

CFD simulations of a mixing sensitive reaction process, carried out in a stirred vessel and consisting of two parallel second order reactions competing for a common reagent, axe performed. The different discretization needs of the process simulation with respect to the fluid-dynamics simulation axe addressed and exploited to conveniently conduct the former with a much coarser gridding. Simulation results are compared with in-house experimental data and a good agreement is observed. No micromixing modelling is found to be required in order to match simulations and experiment, even when the common reagent is slowly injected in the premixed solution containing the other two reagents.

Keywords

Large Eddy Simulation Stir Tank Reactor Stirrer Speed Slow Injection Flow Field Simulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Brucato A., Ciofalo M., Grisafi F., Micale G. (1998) Numerical prediction of flow fields in baffled stirred vessels: a comparison of alternative modelling ap-proaches. Chem. Eng. Sci. 53, 3653–3684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ng K., Fentiman N.J., Lee K.C., Yianneskis M. (1998) Assessment of sliding mesh CFD predictions and LDA measurements of the flow in a tank stirred by a Rushton impeller. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 76, 737–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Derksen J.J., Van den Akker H.E.A. (1999) Large eddy simulations on the flow driven by a Rushton turbine A.I.Ch. E. J. 45, 209–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harris C.K., Roekaerts D., Rosendal F.J.J. (1996) Computational fluid dynamics for chemical reactor engineering. Chem. Eng. Sci. 51, 1569–1594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kuipers J.A.M., Swaaij W.P.M. (1997) Application of computational fluid dynamics to chemical reaction engineering. Rew. in Chem. Engng. 13, 1–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Smith J.M. (1990) Industrial needs for mixing research. Trans IchemE 68, 3–6Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baldyga J., Bourne J.R., Hearn S.J. (1997) Interaction between chemical reac-tions and mixing on various scales. Chem. Eng. Sci. 52, 457–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baldyga J., Bourne J.R. (1992) Interaction between mixing on various scales in stirred tank reactors. Chem. Eng. Sci. 47, 1839–1848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pipino M., Fox R.O. (1994) Reactive mixing in a tubular jet reactor: a comparison of PDF simulation with experimental data. Chem. Eng. Sci. 49, 5229–5241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marchisio D.L., Barresi A. A., Baldi G., Fox R.O. (2000) Comparison of different modelling approaches to turbulent precipitation. Proc. of the 10th Europ. Conf. on Mixing, H.E.A. Van den Akker and J.J. Derksen Eds., Elsevier (Amsterdam), 77–84Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Akiti O., Armenante P.M. (2000) A computational and experimental study of mixing and chemical reaction in a stirred tank reactor equipped with a down- pumping hydrofoil impeller using a micro-mixing-based CFD model. Proc. of the 10th Europ. Conf. on Mixing, H.E.A. Van den Akker and J.J. Derksen Eds., Elsevier (Amsterdam), 61–68Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Patterson G.K., Randick J. (2000) Simulation with validation of mixing effects in continuos and fed-batch reactors Proc. of the 10th Europ.Conf. on Mixing, H.E.A. Van den Akker and J.J. Derksen Eds., Elsevier (Amsterdam), 53–60Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baldyga J., Henczka M., Makowski L. (2000) Influence of viscosity on turbulent mixing and product distribution of parallel chemical reactions. Proc. of the 10th Europ. Conf. on Mixing, H.E.A. Van den Akker and J.J. Derksen Eds., Elsevier (Amsterdam), 101–108Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brucato A., Ciofalo M., Grisafi F., Tocco R. (2000) On the simulation of stirred tank reactors via computational fluid dynamics. Chem. Eng. Sci. 55, 291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baldyga J., Bourne J.R. (1990) The effect of micromixing on parallel reactions. Chem. Eng. Sci. 45, 907–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baldyga J., Bourne J.R., Yang Yang (1993) Influence of feed pipe diameter on mesomixing in stirred tank reactors. Chem. Eng. Sci. 48, 3383–3390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bourne J.R., Gholap R.V., Rewatkar V.B. (1995) The influence of viscosity on the product distribution of parallel reactions. Chem. Eng. J. 58, 15–20Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Luo J. Y., Gosman A.D., Issa R.I., Middleton J.C., Fitzgerald M.K. (1993). Full flow field computation of mixing in baffled stirred vessels. Trans. IChemE 71 (A), 342–344Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wu H., Patterson G.K. (1989) Laser-Doppler measurements of turbulent-flow parameters in stirred tanks. Chem. Eng. Sci. 44, 2207–2221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Van Doormal J.P., Raithby G.D. (1984) Enhancements of the SIMPLE method for predicting incompressible fluid flows. Numer. Heat Transfer 7, 147–163Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yakhot V., Orszag S.A., Yakhot A. (1987) Heat transfer in turbulent fluids — I. pipe flow. Int. J. of Heat and Mass Transfer 30, No. 1, 15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chapra S.C., Canale R.P. (1989) Numerical Methods for Engineers. Mc Graw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cate A., Bermingham S.K., Derksen J.J., Kramer, H.M.J. (2000) Compartmental modelling of an 1100L DTB crystallizer based on Large Eddy simulation. Proc. of the 10th Europ. Conf. on Mixing, H.E.A. Van den Akker and J.J. Derksen Eds., Elsevier (Amsterdam), 255–264Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Launder B.E., Spalding D.B. (1974) The numerical computation of turbulent flows, Comp. Meth. in Appi. Mech. and Engng. 3, 269–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Middleton J.C., Pierce F., Lynch P.M. (1986) Computation of flow fields and complex reaction yield in turbulent stirred reactors and comparison with experimental data. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 64, 18–22Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia, Milan 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Brucato
    • 1
  • F. Grisafi
    • 1
  • G. Micale
    • 2
  • L. Rizzuti
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Ingegneria Chimica dei Processi e dei MaterialiPalermoItaly
  2. 2.Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity College of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations