Advertisement

Evaluation and Triage

Current Use and Utility of the Trauma Scoring Systems
  • P. Carli

Abstract

In the last 25 years many scores have been proposed to evaluate the trauma patients. Many parameters have been introduced to try to assess patient status, describe the injuries and finally predict the outcome. Obviously considering the multiple scores available in the current literature none is perfect. The main scores proposed are listed in Table 1. We will limit our analysis to the scores that have been specifically designed for the patient in emergency or during initial management.

Keywords

Trauma Patient Glasgow Coma Scale Injury Severity Score Trauma Care Abbreviate Injury Scale 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    ACSCOT (1990) American College of Surgeon’s Committee on Trauma. Resources for optimal care of the injured patient. ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baker SP, O’Neil B (1976) The Injury Severity Score: an update. J Trauma 16:882–885PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baxt W, Jones J, Fortlage D (1991) The trauma triage rule: a new resource-based approach to the prehospital identification of major trauma victims. Ann Emerg Med 19:1404–1406Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boyd CR, Tolson MA, Copes WS (1987) Evaluation of trauma care: the TRISS method. J Trauma 27:370–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carh P, Riou B, Barriot P (1993) Trauma anesthesia practices throughout the world: France. In: C Grande (ed) Textbook of trauma anesthesia and critical care. Mosby Saint-Louis, pp 199–205Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Champion HR, Copes WS (1990) The major Trauma Outcome Study: estabhshing national norms for trauma care. J Trauma 30:1356–1365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WS, Gann DS, Gennarelli TA (1989) A revision of the trauma score. J Trauma 29:623–629PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Emerman CL, Shade B, Kubincanek J (1991) A comparison of EMT judgment and prehospital trauma triage instruments. J Trauma 31:1369–1375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gormican S (1982) CRAMS scale field triage of trauma victim. Ann Emerg Med 11:132–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jennett B, Teasdale G, Braakman R (1979) Prognosis of patients with severe head injury. Neurosurgery 4:283–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ornato J, Mlinek EJ (1985) Ineffectiveness of the Trauma Score and the CRAMS scale for accurately triaging patients to trauma centers. Ann Emerg Med 14:1049–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schmidt U, Frame SB, Nerhch ML, Rowe DW, Enderson BL, Maull KI (1992) On-scene helicopter transport of patients with multiple injuries. Comparison of a German and an American system. J Trauma 33:548–555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Teasdale G, Jennett B (1974) Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: a practical scale. Lancet 2:81–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yates D, Carli P, Woodford M, Soleil C (1994) Towards statistical comparison of French and British systems of initial trauma care. Jeur 2:88–93Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yates DW (1990) Scoring systems for trauma. Br Med J 301:1090–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia, Milano 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Carli

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations