Advertisement

Functional MRI pp 138-141 | Cite as

Ultrafast Imaging of the Cardiovascular System

  • J. F. Debatin
Conference paper
Part of the Syllabus book series (SYLLABUS)

Abstract

The implementation of stronger and faster gradient systems has laid the foundation for vast reductions in magnetic resonance (MR) data acquisition times. Beyond accelerating conventional sequences [1, 2], echo planar imaging (EPI), as first described by Mansfield in 1977 [3], now appears practical. Although much of the preliminary work with echo planar imaging has focused on the heart, EPI provides a unique opportunity to improve the morphologic and functional MR-based evaluation of other vascular structures.

Keywords

Deep Venous Thrombosis Echo Planar Imaging Data Acquisition Time Echo Planar Imaging Sequence Cardiac Ejection Fraction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Chien D, Edelman R (1991) Ultrafast imaging using gradient echoes. Magn Reson Q 7: 31–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Butts K, Riederer SJ (1992) Analysis of flow effects in echo-planar imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2: 285–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mansfield P (1977) Multiplanar image formation using NMR spin-echoes. J Phys C: Solid State Physics 10: L55 - L58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stehling MK, Turner R, Mansfield P (1991) Echo-Planar Imaging: Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Fraction of a Second. Science 254: 43–50Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davis CP, McKinnon GC, Debatin JF, Wetter DR, Eichen-berger AC, Duewell S, Schulthess GK (1994) EPI-Evaluation of the Heart. Radiology 191: 691–696PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farzaneh F, Riederer SJ, Pelc NJ (1990) Analysis of T2 limitations and off-resonance effects on spatial resolution and artifacts in echo planar imaging. Magn Reson Med 14: 123–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McKinnon GC (1993) Ultrafast interleaved gradient-echo-planar imaging on a standard scanner. Magn Reson Med 30: 609–616PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Butts K, Riederer SJ, Ehman RL, Thompson RM, Jack CR (1994) Interleaved echo planar imaging on a standard MRI system. Magn Reson Med 31: 67–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wetter DR, McKinnon GC, Debatin JF, von Schulthess GK (1995) Comparison of single and multiple shot echo planar strategies for cardiac MR imaging. Radiology 194: 765–770PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McKinnon GC (1994) Interleaved echo planar phase contrast angiography. Magn Reson Med 31: 1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wedeen VJ, Wedt RE, Jerosch-Herold M (1989) Motional phase artifacts in Fourier transform MRI. Magn Reson Med 11: 114–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Debatin JF, Nadel SN, Paolini J et al. (1992) Cardiac ejection fracton: Phantom study comparing CINE MR Imaging, radionuclide blood pool imaging and ventriculography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2: 135–142Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    NASCET collaborators (1991) Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 325: 445–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heiserman JE, Drayer BP, Fram EK, Keller PJ (1992) MR angiography of cervical fibromuscular dysplasia. AJNR 13: 1454–1457PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wildermuth S, Debatin JF, Huisman T, Leung DA, McKinnon GC, von Shculthess GK (1994) 3D phase contrast EPI of the carotid arteries: initial evaluation in a volunteer study. In: Book of abstracts, Society of Magnetic Resonance. San Francisco, CA, P963Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Owen RS, Carpenter JP, Baum RA, Perloff LJ, Cope C (1992) Magnetic resonance imaging of angiographically occult runoff vessels in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. N Engl J Med 326: 1577–1581PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Barnes RW, Nix ML, Barnes CL (1989) Perioperative asymptomatic venous thrombosis: role of duplex scanning versus venography. J Vasc Surg 9: 251–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Holtz DJ, Debatin JF, Unterweger M, Wildermuth S, Leung DA, von Schulthess GK (1994) Phase-contrast evaluation of venous flow-augmentation: effect on ultrafast MR-venography of the calf. In: Book of abstracts, Society of Magnetic Resonance, San Francisco, CA, P957Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia, Milano 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. F. Debatin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Medical RadiologyUniversity Hospital ZürichZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations