Cardiac and Locomotory Muscle Mass in Antarctic Fishes

  • Russell F. Robertson
  • Nia M. Whiteley
  • Stuart Egginton


The fish fauna around Antarctica is dominated by a single perciform suborder, the Notothenioidei, whose phylogeny has been well defined by traditional and molecular techniques. They have undergone a remarkable adaptive radiation (into a variety of forms from small, sculpin-like to large, hake-like species) that is possibly unique in the marine environment, and which molecular evidence suggests is a relatively recent event [1]. The last few decades have seen the development of extensive scientific and commercial fishing in the Southern Ocean that has provided much data on the growth and reproduction of a wide range of species. In contrast, financial constraints and logistical difficulties have meant that studies into the physiological mechanisms that allow these fishes to successfully exploit this extremely cold and highly seasonal environment have mainly concentrated on a few species, predominantly from Nototheniidae and Channichthyidae [2,3]. Antarctic pelagic fishes are diverse in their origins, coming from bathypelagic, mesopelagic and, of most interest for our purpose, from coastal fish families that have become secondarily adapted to midwater life. However, most species (about 75% of those so far recorded) inhabit benthic or demersal niches, which is thought to reflect the benthic lifestyle of the parent taxa, and helps explain the lack of a functional swimbladder [2]. Those species that are now able to exploit the water column have had to evolve means of adjusting buoyancy, including reduced skeletal ossification and extensive lipid deposits [3].


Pectoral Muscle Antarctic Fish Locomotory Muscle Pleuragramma Antarcticum Total Skeletal Muscle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Clarke A, Johnston IA (1996) Evolution and adaptive radiation of Antarctic fishes. Trends Ecol Evol 11:212–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kock K-H (1992) Antarctic fish and fisheries. Cambridge University Press. pp 359Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eastman JT (1993) Antarctic fish biology: evolution in a unique environment. Academic Press, London, pp 322Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Montgomery JC, Macdonald JA (1984) Performance of motor systems in Antarctic fishes. J Comp Physiol 154A:241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Egginton S, Davison W (1997) Effects of environmental and experimental stress on Antarctic fishes. In: Playle R C, Pörtner HO (eds) Cold ocean physiology. Soc Exp Biol Seminar Series 66, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 299–326Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hemmingsen EA, Douglas EL (1972) Respiratory and circulatory responses in a haemoglobin-free fish, Chaenocephalus aceratus, to changes in temperature and oxygen tension. Comp Biochem Physiol 43A: 1031–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Egginton S (1994) Stress response in two Antarctic teleosts (Chaenocephalus aceratus Lönnberg and Notothenia coriiceps Richardson) following capture and surgery. J Comp Physiol B 164:482–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Russell F. Robertson
    • 1
  • Nia M. Whiteley
    • 1
  • Stuart Egginton
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesUK
  2. 2.Department of PhysiologyUniversity of Birmingham, EdgbastonBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations