Advertisement

Dementias pp 297-308 | Cite as

Ethical Problems in Caring for Demented Patients

  • G. J. Agich

Abstract

Caring for patients suffering from dementia involves some of the most difficult ethical problems in adult medicine because of the nature of dementia and the way that dominant ethical principles apply to the clinical features of dementia. In this paper I first discuss the features of dementia that complicate the care of demented patients, including the nature of diagnostic and prognostic information; cognitive, communicative, and other deficits associated with the disorder; and the dependence on others that dementia induces in patients. Second, I discuss the problem posed for the ethics of caring for demented patients by the ideal of respect for patient autonomy that dominates contemporary bioethics, especially as this ideal is expressed in the rights to informed consent, self-determination, and decision-making.

Keywords

Advance Directive Ethical Problem Dementia Patient Demented Patient Surrogate Decision Maker 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Mayeux R, Foster NL, Rossor M, Whitehouse PJ (1993) The clinical evaluation of patients with dementia. In: Whitehouse PJ (ed) Dementia (Contemporary neurology series, vol 40). Davis, Philadelphia, pp 92–129Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Geldmacher DS, Whitehouse PJ (1996) Evaluation of dementia. N Engl J Med 335: 330–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Corey Bloom J, Thal LJ, Galasko D, et al (1995) Diagnosis and evaluation of dementia. Neurology 45: 211–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Katzman R (1986) Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 314: 964–973PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Post SG (1994) Genetics, ethics, and Alzheimer’s disease. J Am Geriatr Soc 42: 782–786PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Post SG, Whitehouse PJ (1995) Fairhill guidelines on ethics of the care of people with Alzheimer’s disease: a clinical summary. J Am Geriatr Soc 43: 1423–1429PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roses AD (1995) Apolipoprotein e genotyping and the differential diagnosis, not prediction, of Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol 38: 6–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Whitehouse PJ (ed) (1993) Dementia (Contemporary neurology series, vol 40). Davis, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moody HR (1988) From informed consent to negotiated consent. Gerontologist 28 [Suppl]: 64–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Agich GJ (1990) Reassessing autonomy in long-term care. Hastings Center Rep 20: 12–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Agich GJ (1993) Autonomy and long term care. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Agich GJ (1995) Actual autonomy and long-term care decision making. In: McCullough LE, Wilson NL (eds) Long-term care decisions: ethical and conceptual dimensions. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 113–136Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Drickamer MA, Lachs MS (1992) Should patients with Alzheimer’s disease be told their diagnosis? N Engl J Med 326: 947–951PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Post SG, Foley JM (1992) Biological markers and truth-telling. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 6: 201–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Volans PJ (1989) Psychological approaches to assessment and management in dementia. In: Katona CLE (ed) Dementia disorders: advances and prospects. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 174–191Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gibson JM (1990) National values history project. Gerontologist 31: 447–456Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Doukas DJ, McCullough LM (1991) The values history: the evaluation of the patient’s values and advance directives. J Fam Pract 32: 145–153PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kane RA (1995) Decision making, care plans, and life plans in long-term care: can case managers take account of clients’ values and preferences. In: McCullough LE, Wilson NL (eds) Long-term care decisions: ethical and conceptual dimensions. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 87–109Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Foley JM (1992) The experience of being demented. In: Binstock RH, Post SG, Whitehouse PJ (eds) Dementia and aging: ethics, values, and policy choices. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 31–43Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sacks O (1990) The man who mistook his wife for a hat. Harper Perennial, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moody HR (1992) A critical view of ethical dilemmas in dementia. In: Binstock RH, Post SG, Whitehouse PJ (eds) Dementia and aging. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 86–100Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Post SG, Ripich DN, Whitehouse PJ (1994) Discourse ethics: research, dementia, and communication. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 8[Suppl 4]: 58–65Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ripich D, Vertes D, Whitehouse P, Fulton S, Ekelman B (1991) Turn-taking and speech act patterns in the discourse of senile dementia of the Alzheimer’s type patient. Brain Lang 40: 330–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Buchanan A, Brock DW (1986) Deciding for others. Milbank Q 64[Suppl 2]: 17–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fitten LJ, Lusky R, Hamann C (1990) Assessing treatment decision-making capacity in elderly nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc 38: 1097–1104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Grisso T (1986) Evaluating competencies: forensic assessments and instruments. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Marson DC, Schmitt FA, Ingram KK, Harreil LE (1994) Determining the competency of Alzheimer’s patients to consent to treatment and research. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 8[Suppl 4]:5–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    McKinnon K, Cournos N, Stanley B (1989) Rivers in practice: clinicians’ assessment of patients’ decision-making capacity. Hosp Community Psychiatry 40: 1159–1162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Weiner BA, Wettstein RM (1993) Competency and guardianship. In: Weiner BA, Weltstein RM (eds) Legal issues in mental health care. Plenum, New York, pp 273–308Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Caralis PV (1994) Ethical and legal issues in the care of Alzheimer’s patients. Med Clin North Am 78: 877–893PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sachs GA, Cassel CK (1989) Ethical aspects of dementia. Neurol Clin 7: 845–858PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gutheil TG, Appelbaum PS (1982) Substituted judgment: best interests in disguise. Hastings Center Rep 13: 8–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mace NL, Rabins PV (1991) The 36-hour day, rev edn. John Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dresser RS (1992) Autonomy revisited: the limits of anticipatory choices. In: Binstock RH, Post SG, Whitehouse PJ (eds) Dementia and aging. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 71–85Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dworkin R (1986) Autonomy and the demented self. Milbank Q 64[Suppl 2]: 4–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rhoden NK (1990) The limits of legal objectivity. North Carolina Law Rev 68: 845–865Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Buchanan A (1988) Advance directives and the personal identity problem. Philos Publ Affairs 17: 277–302Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (1994) Principles of biomedical ethics, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pellegrino ED, Thomasma DC (1988) For the patient’s good: restoration of beneficence in health care. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Agich GJ (1990) Medicine as business and profession. Theor Med 11: 311–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Agich GJ (1990) Rationing and professional autonomy. Law Med Health Care 18: 77–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Agich GJ (1987) Incentives and obligations under prospective payment. J Med Philos 11: 123–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. J. Agich

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations