Skip to main content

Progress in Scoring Systems, Safety and Quality of Care in the ICU

  • Conference paper
Anaesthesia, Pain, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine — A.P.I.C.E.
  • 139 Accesses

Abstract

Probability models derived from scoring systems are used to evaluate the performance of ICUs [15]. The comparison of observed versus expected mortality or standard mortality ratio (SMR) is said to be reproducible and related to the efficacy of the units.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Zimmerman JE, Shortell SM, Knaus WA et al (1993) Value and cost of teaching hospitals: a prospective, multicenter, inception cohort study. Crit Care Med 21:1432–1442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Knaus Wa, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1986) An evaluation of outcome from intensive care in major medical centers. Ann Intern Med 104:410–418

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zimmerman JE, Shortell SM, Rousseau D et al (1993) Improving intensive care: observations based on organizational case studies in nine intensive care units: a prospective, multicenter study. Crit Care Med 21:1443–1451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) base on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 270:2957–2963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Loirat P (1995) Scores de gravité: évaluation des performances. Actualités en Réanimation et Urgences. Arnette, Paris 91–98

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rapoport J, Teres D, Lemeshow S, Gehlbach S (1994) A method for assessing the clinical performance and cost-effectiveness of intensive care: a multicenter inception cohort study. Crit Care Med 22:1385–1391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lewinsohn G, Herman A, Leonov Y, Klinowski E (1994) Critically ill obstetrical patients: outcome and predictability. Crit Care Med 22 1412–1414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rowan KM, Kerr JH, Major E et al (1994) Intensive care society’s acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) study in Britain and Ireland: a prospective, multicenter cohort study comparing two methods for predicting outcome for adult intensive care patients. Crit Care Med 22:1392–1401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sirio CA, Tajmi K, Tase C et al (1992) An initial comparison of intensive care in Japan and the United States. Crit Care Med 20:1207–1215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Oh TE, Hutchinson R, Short S et al (1993) Verification of the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation scoring system in a Hong Kong intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 21: 698–705

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Marsh HM, Krishan I, Naessens JM (1990) Assessment of prediction of mortality by using the APACHE II scoring system in intensive care units. Mayo Clin Proc 65:4549–1557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Berger M, Marazzi A, Freeman A, Chiolera R (1992) Evaluation of the consistency of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scoring in a surgical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 20:1681–1687

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Loirat P (1994) Critique of existing scoring systems: admission scores. Réanimation Urgences 3:173–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Escarce J, Kelley MA (1990) Admission source to the medical intensive care unit predicts hospital death independent of APACHE II score. JAMA 264:2389–2394

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Borlase BC, Baxter JK, Kenney PR (1991) Elective intrahospital admissions versus acute in-terhospital transfers to a surgical intensive care unit: cost and outcome prediction. J Trauma 31:915–918

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Boyd O, Grounds RM (1993) Physiological scoring systems and audit. Lancet 341:1573–1574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Teres D, Higgins T, Steingrub J et al (1998) Defining a high-performance ICU system for the 21st century: a position paper. J Int Care Med 13:195–205

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this paper

Cite this paper

Le Gall, JR., Alberti, C. (1999). Progress in Scoring Systems, Safety and Quality of Care in the ICU. In: Gullo, A. (eds) Anaesthesia, Pain, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine — A.P.I.C.E.. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2145-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2145-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0051-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2145-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics