Advertisement

The Problem of Informed Consent in Critically Ill Patients

  • H. Burchardi
Conference paper

Abstract

In intensive care medicine decisions are characterised by: uncertainty of diagnosis, urgency of treatment, continuous change of situation, and high costs of interventions. Specific pressure is caused by the “technologic imperative” which means:
  1. 1.

    the need to do everything, regardless of outcome, potential effects or costs, particularly when patients are likely to die without aggressive treatment and when patients cannot make their own decision;

     
  2. 2.

    strict legal demands for liability and claims for damages promote defensive medicine and high level of measures for diagnosis and therapy: invasive (e.g. pulmonary artery catheter) as well as expensive (e.g. Labs, CT scans) diagnostics and treatments (e.g. operations, organ function replacement).

     

Keywords

Pulmonary Artery Catheter Intensive Care Medicine Legal Representative Defensive Medicine Presume Consent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Vincent JL (1990) European attitudes towards ethical problems in ICM: Results of an ethical questionnaire. Crit Care Med 16:256–264Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Luce JM (1995) Physicians do not have a responsibility to provide futile or unreasonable care if a patient or family insists. Crit Care Med 23:760–766PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Task Force on Ethics of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (1990) Consensus report on the ethics of foregoing life-sustaining treatments in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 18:1435–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    The Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee (1992) Attitudes of critical care medicine professionals concerning forgoing life-sustaining treatments. Crit Care Med 20:320–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deutsch E (1997) Clinical studies in the intensive care unit: ethical and legal aspects. In: Burchardi H (ed) Current topics in intensive care, vol 4. WB Saunders, London Philadelphia Toronto, pp 265–280Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bieda K, Meran JG, Wagner TOF et al (1997) Aufklärung zwischen rechtlicher Forderung und Patienten wunsch. Forum Deutsche Krebsgsellschaft 12:112–116Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vincent JL (1998) Information in the ICU: Are we being honest with our patients? The results of a European questionnaire. Intensive Care Med (in press)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lynn J, Harrell F, Cohn F et al (1997) Prognoses of seriously ill hospitalized patients on the days before death: implications for patient care and public policy. New Horiz 5:56–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ruark JE, Raffln TA, Stanford University Medical Center Committee on Ethics (1988) Initiating and withdrawing life support: Principles and practice in adult medicine. N Engl J Med 318:25–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Burchardi
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Anaesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care MedicineUniversity of GöttingenGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations