Volume Distribution and Ventilatory Modes in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

  • C. Chopin
  • M. C. Chambrin
Conference paper


Since the first publication by Gattinoni et al., who used high resolution CT scans, it is well documented that acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a heterogeneous lung disease [1]. Morphological examination of the lung shows structural alterations depending on the stage of this disease [2]. In the acute exudative stage an increased permeability of the alveolar barrier is responsible for a widespread interstitial oedema. As the disease progresses, interstitial fluid containing fibrin escapes toward the alveolar space, generating alveolar oedema, hyaline membrane; leukocytes accumulation occurs. Interstitial and alveolar oedema are predominantly distributed in the dependent area of the lung which are the dorsal regions for patients in supine position. Measured at this early stage, lung compliance (CL) and end expiratory lung volume (EELV) are low, airway resistance (Raw) is normal or slightly high. Application of moderate positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) is sufficient to recruit a large amount of non functional alveoli. This recruitment phenomenon is responsible for a decrease in the intrapulmonary shunt along with PaO2, EELV and CL increase [3]. The subacute proliferative stage is characterized by type II pneumocyte hyperplasia and fibroblast colonization. At this stage main features are a decrease in CL and EELV and an increase in airway resistance [4, 5]. Application of PEEP and positive inspiratory pressure (PIP), even at high level, is not able to recruit the consolidated parts of the lung. However, high level of PIP is responsible for overdistension of the remaining normally aerated pulmonary units submitted to very high transpulmonary pressure gradient which therefore receive the main part of the tidal volume.


Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patient Ventilatory Mode Intrapulmonary Shunt 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Gattinoni L, Pesenti A, Torresini A (1986) Adult respiratory distress syndrome profiles by computed tomography. J Thorac Imag 1:25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schlag G, Redl H (1988) The morphology of the adult respiratory distress syndrome. In: Kox W, Bihari D (eds) Shock and the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Springer, Berlin, pp 21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Suter PM, Fairley HB, Isemberg MD (1978) Effect of tidal volume and positive end expiratory pressure on compliance during mechanical ventilation. Chest 73:158–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wright P, Bernard G (1989) The role of airflow resistance in patient with the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis 139:1169–1174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pesenti A, Pelosi P, Rossi N et al (1991) The effects of positive end expiratory pressure on respiratory resistance in patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome and in normal anesthetized subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis 144:101–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dreyfuss D, Basset G, Soler P et al (1985) Intermittent positive hyperventilation with high inflation pressure produces pulmonary microvascular injury in rats. Am Rev Respir Dis 132: 380–384Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dreyfuss D, Saumon G (1993) Role of tidal volume, FRC and end expiratory volume in the development of pulmonary edema following mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 148: 1194–1203PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Artigas A, Bernard GR, Carlet J et al and the Consensus Committee (1998) The American-European consensus conference on ARDS. Part 2. Ventilatory, pharmacologic, supportive therapy, study design strategies and issues related to recovery and remodeling. Intensive Care Med 24:3785–3398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blanch PB, Jones M, Layon AJ, Camner N (1993) Pressure preset ventilation. Part 1: physiologic and mechanical consideration. Chest 104:590–599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blanch PB, Jones M, Layon AJ, Camner N (1993) Pressure preset ventilation. Part 2: Mechanics and safety. Chest 104:904–912PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bates JHT, Rossi A, Milic-Emili J (1985) Analysis of the behavior of the respiratory system with constant inspiratory flow. J Appl Physiol 58:1840–1848PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chang HK, Mortola JP (1981) Fluid dynamic factors in tracheal pressure measurement. J Appl Physiol 51:218–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reynolds E (1971) Effect of alterations in mechanical ventilator settings on pulmonary gas exchange in hyaline membrane disease. Arch Dis Child 46:152–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cole ACG, Weiler SF, Sykes MK (1984) Inverse ratio ventilation compared with PEEP in adult respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med 10:227–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gurevitch MJ, Van Dyke J, Young ES, Jackson K (1986) Improved oxygenation and lower peak airway pressure in severe adult respiratory distress syndrome: treatment with inverse ratio ventilation. Chest 89:211–213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marcy WT, Marini JJ (1991) Inverse ratio ventilation, rationale for implementation. Chest 100:494–504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mang H, Kacmareck RM, Ritz R et al (1995) Cardiorespiratory effects of volume and pressure controlled ventilation at various I/E ratios in an acute lung injury model. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 151:731–736PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ludwigs U, Klingstedt C, Baehrendtz S, Hedenstierna G (1997) A comparison of pressure and volume-controlled ventilation at different inspiratory to expiratory ratio. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 41:71–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zavala E, Ferrer M, Polese G et al (1998) Effect of inverse ratio ventilation on gas exchange in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology 88:35–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Davis K, Branson RD, Campbell RS, Porembka DT (1996) Comparison of volume control and pressure control ventilation: is flow wave form the difference? J Trauma 41:808–814PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Markström AM, Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, Svensson BA et al (1996) Ventilation with constant versus decelerating inspiratory flow in experimentally induced acute respiratory failure. Anesthesiology 84:882–889PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pillet O, Choukroun ML, Castaing Y (1993) Effects of inspiratory flow rate alteration on gas exchange during mechanical ventilation in normal lungs. Chest 103:1161–1165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gammon RB, Shin MS, Groves RH et al (1995) Clinical risk factors for pulmonary barotrauma: a multivariate analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 152:1235–1240PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rouby JJ, Lherm T, De Lasalle ME et al (1993) Histological aspect of pulmonary barotrauma in critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure. Intensive Care Med 19:383–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maclntyre NR (1993) Clinically available new strategies for mechanical ventilatory support. Chest 104:560–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Abraham E, Yoshihara G (1989) Cardiorespiratory effect of pressure controlled ventilation in severe respiratory failure. Chest 96:1356–1359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tharratt RS, Allen RP, Albertson TE (1988) Pressure controlled inverse ratio ventilation in severe adult respiratory failure. Chest 94:755–762PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sassoon CSH (1991) Positive pressure ventilation: alternate modes. Chest 100:494–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lachmann B, Schairer W, Armbrusters S et al (1989) Improved arterial oxygenation and CO2 elimination following changes from generated PEEP ventilation with inspiratory/expiratory ratio of 1/2 to pressure generated ventilation with I/E of 4/1 in patients with severe ARDS. Adv Exp Med Biol 248:779–786PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mufioz J, Guerrero JE, Escalante J et al (1993) Pressure controlled ventilation versus controlled mechanical ventilation with decelerating flow. Crit Care Med 21:1143–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mercat A, Graïni L, Teboul JL et al (1993) Cardiorespiratory effects of pressure controlled ventilation with and without inverse ratio in the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Chest 104:871–875PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mercat A, Titiriga M, Anguel N et al (1997) Inverse ratio ventilation (I/E = 2/1) in acute respiratory distress syndrome. A six-hour controlled study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 155: 1637–1642PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ludwigs U, Klingstedt C, Baehrendtz S et al (1994) A functional and morphologic analysis of pressure-controlled ventilation in oleic acid lung injury. Chest 106:925–931PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Brown DG, Pierson DJ (1986) Auto-PEEP in mechanically ventilated patients: A study of incidence, severity and detection. Respir Care 31:1069–1074Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Patel H, Yang KL (1995) Variability of positive end-expiratory pressure in patient receiving mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 23:1074–1079PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hoffman RA, Ershowsky P, Krieger BP (1989) Determination of auto-PEEP during spontaneous and controlled ventilation by monitoring changes in end expiratory thoracic gas volume. Chest 96:613–616PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kacmarek RM, Kirmse M, Nishimura N et al (1995) The effects of applied vs auto-PEEP on local lung unit pressure and volume in a four-unit lung model. Chest 108:1073–1979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pepe PE, Marini JJ (1982) Occult end expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with airflow obstruction. Am J Respir Dis 126:166–170Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rappaport SH, Shpiner R, Yoshiara G et al (1994) Randomized prospective trial of pressure-limited versus volume-controlled ventilation in severe respiratory failure. Crit Care Med 22:22–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Putensen C, Räsänen J, Lopez FA (1994) Ventilation-perfusion distribution during mechanical ventilation with surimposed spontaneous breathing in canine lung injury. Am J Respir Care Med 150:101–108Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Chopin
    • 1
  • M. C. Chambrin
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of Anaesthesia and Intensive CareR. Salengro HospitalLilleFrance
  2. 2.INSERMUniversity of Lille IILilleFrance

Personalised recommendations