Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Anaesthesia, Pain, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine — A.P.I.C.E. pp 549–556Cite as

Management of Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction

  • Conference paper

  • 138 Accesses

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock remains a leading cause of early cardiac death. The mortality rate of cardiogenic shock as a complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) exceeds 80%. Large multicenter studies disclose an incidence of 5 to 15% of all instances of AMI admitted to the hospital [1–5]. Cardiogenic shock is in evidence at the time of hospital admission in only minority of patients. Approximately 90% of patients develop shock during the in hospital stay [5].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Scheidt S, Ascheim R, Killip III T (1970) Shock after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 26:556–564

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hands ME, Rutherford JD, Muller JE et al (1989) The in-hospital development of cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction: incidence of occurrence, outcome and prognostic factors. J Am Coll Cardiol 14:40–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, Alpert JS et al (1991) Cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. Incidence and mortality from a community-wide perspective, 1975 to 1988. N Engl J Med 325:1117–1122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Garrahy PJ, Henzlova MJ, Forman S et al (1989) Has thrombolytic therapy improved survival from cardiogenic shock? Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMIII) results. Circulation 80[SupplII]:II–623

    Google Scholar 

  5. Holmes DR, Bates ER, Kleiman NS et al (1995) Contemporary reperfusion therapy for cardiogenic shock: the GUSTO-I trial experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 26:668–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamm CW, Goldmann BU, Heeschen C et al (1997) Emergency room triage of patients with acute chest pain by means of rapid testing for cardiac troponin T or troponin I. N Engl J Med 337:1648–1653

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kishon Y, Oh JK, Schaff H Y et al (1992) Mitral valve operation in postinfarction rupture of a papillary muscle: immediate results and long-term follow-up of 22 patients. Mayo Clin Proc 67:1023–1030

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lemery R, Smith HC, Giuliani ER et al (1992) Prognosis in rupture of the ventricular septum after acute myocardial infarction and role of early surgical intervention. Am J Cardiol 70: 147–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Da Luz PL, Weil MH, Shubin H (1976) Current concepts on mechanisms and treatment of cardiogenic shock. Am Heart J 92:103–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Forrester JS, Diamond G, Chatterjee K et al (1976) Medical therapy of acute myocardial infarction by application of hemodynamic subsets. N Engl J Med 295:1356–1363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohn JN (1970) Monitoring techniques in shock. Am J Cardiol 26:565–569

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Antman EM, Braunwald E (1997) Hemodynamic disturbances in acute myocardial infarction. Cardiogenic Shock. In: Braunwald E (ed) Heart disease. A textbook of cardiovascular medicine. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1233–1245

    Google Scholar 

  13. Califf RM, Bengtson JR (1994) Cardiogenic shock. New Engl J Med 330:1724–1730

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gillespie TA, Ambos HD, Sobel BE et al (1977) Effects of dobutamine in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 39:588–594

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Weil MH, Shubin H, Carlson R (1975) Treatment of circulatory shock. JAMA 231:1280–1286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mueller H, Ayres SM, Gregory JJ et al (1970) Hemodynamics, coronary blood flow, and myocardial metabolism in coronary shock: Response to L-norepinephrine and isoproterenol. J Clin Invest 49:1885–1902

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction (1996) A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 28:1328–1428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gacioch GM, Ellis SG, Lee L. et al (1992) Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: the use of coronary angioplasty and the integration of the new support devices into patient management. J Am Coll Cardiol 19:647–653

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Joyce LD, Johnson KE, Toninato CJ et al (1989) Results of the first 100 patients who received Symbion total artificial hearts as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. Circulation 80[Suppl 3]III: 192–201

    Google Scholar 

  20. Champagnac D, Claudel JP, Chevalier P et al (1993) Primary cardiogenic shock during acute myocardial infarction: results of emergency cardiac transplantation. Eur Heart J 14:925–929

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. DeWood MA, Notske RN, Hensley GR et al (1980) Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation with and without reperfusion for myocardial infarction shock. Circulation 61:1105–1112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Berger P, Holmes D, Stebbins A et al (1997) Impact of an aggressive catheterization and revascularization strategy on mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue plasminogen Activator for Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 96:122–127

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Page DL, Caulfield JB, Kastor JA et al (1971) Myocardial changes associated with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 285:133–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gutovitz AL, Sobel BE, Roberts R (1978) Progressive nature of myocardial injury in selected patients with cardiogenic shock. Am J Cardiol 41:469–475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Braunwald E, Kloner RA (1982) The stunned myocardium: prolonged, postischemic ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 66:1146–1149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Prewitt RM, Gu S, Garger PJ et al (1992) Marked systemic hypotension depresses coronary thrombolysis induced by intracoronary administration of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator. J Am Coll Cardiol 20:1626–1633

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mathey D, Kuck KH, Remmecke J et al (1980) Transluminal recanalization of coronary artery thrombosis: a preliminary report of its application in cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J 1:207–212

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kennedy JW, Gensini GG, Timmis GC et al (1985) Acute myocardial infarction treated with intracoronary streptokinase: a report of the society for cardiac angiography. Am J Cardiol 55:871–877

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell’Infarto Miocardico (GISSI) (1986) Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1:397–401

    Google Scholar 

  30. Holmes DR, Bates E, and the GUSTO investigators (1993) Cardiogenic shock during myocardial infarction. The GUSTO experience with thrombolytic therapy. Circulation 88[Suppl]:I–253 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hochman JS, Boland J, Sleeper LA et al (1995) Current spectrum of cardiogenic shock and effect of early revascularization on mortality. Circulation 91:873–881

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. O’Neill WW (1992) Angioplasty therapy of cardiogenic shock: are randomized trials necessary? J Am Coll Cardiol 19:915–917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Moosvi AR, Khaja F, Villanueva L et al (1992) Early revascularization improves survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 19:907–914

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee L, Erbel R, Brown TM et al (1991) Multicenter registry of angioplasty therapy of cardiogenic shock: initial and long-term survival. J Am Coll Cardiol 17:599–603

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hibbard MD, Holmes DR, Bailey KR et al (1992) Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients with cardiogenic shock. J Am Coll Cardiol 19:639–646

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee L, Bates ER, Pitt B et al (1988) Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty improves survival in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Circulation 78:1345–1351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Webb JG, Carere R, Hilton JD et al (1997) Usefulness of coronary stenting in cardiogenic shock. Am J Cardiol 79:81–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kirklin JK, Akins CW, Blackstone EH et al (1991) Guidelines and indications for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). J Am Coll Cardiol 91: 2335–2344

    Google Scholar 

  39. O’Connor GT, Plume SK, Olmstead EM et al (1992) Multivariate prediction of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 85:2110–2118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sergeant P, Blackstone E, Meyns B (1997) Early and late outcome after CABG in patients with evolving myocardial infarction. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 11:848–856

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Lee JH, Murrell HK, Strony J et al (1997) Risk analysis of coronary bypass surgery after acute myocardial infarction. Surgery 122:675–680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Critical Care Medicine, Palm Springs, California, USA

    A. Marn Pernat, M. H. Weil & A. Pernat

  2. The University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA

    M. H. Weil

Authors
  1. A. Marn Pernat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. H. Weil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Pernat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Trieste University School of Medicine, Trieste, Italy

    Antonino Gullo M.D. (Head) (Head)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this paper

Cite this paper

Marn Pernat, A., Weil, M.H., Pernat, A. (1999). Management of Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction. In: Gullo, A. (eds) Anaesthesia, Pain, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine — A.P.I.C.E.. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2145-7_54

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2145-7_54

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0051-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2145-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation