Skip to main content

Is Mortality the Only Outcome Measure in ICU Patients?

  • Conference paper

Abstract

Clinical trials, by definition, need to have an aim, an outcome measure. Indeed, there is no point conducting a trial if there is no endpoint in view. The choice of the outcome measure employed will vary according to the agent/technique being assessed but in intensive care medicine, the majority of clinical trials currently focus on the 28 day all-cause mortality rate. This measure may, however, not necessarily be the most appropriate, and we will discuss the reasons for this, and possible alternatives, in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Petros AJ, Marshall JC, van Saene HKF (1995) Should morbidity replace mortality as an end-point for clinical trials in intensive care? Lancet 345:369–371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoffman SL, Punjabi NH, Kumala S et al (1984) Reduction of mortality in chloramphenicol-treated severe typhoid fever by high-dose dexamethasone. N Engl J Med 310:82–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. The veterans administration systemic sepsis cooperative study group (1987) Effect of high-dose glucocorticoid therapy on mortality in patients with clinical signs of systemic sepsis. N Engl J Med 317:659–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Marshall JC, Cook DJ, Christou NV et al (1995) Multiple organ dysfunction score: A reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome. Crit Care Med 23:1638–1652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J et al (1996) The SOFA (sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med 22:707–710

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sprung CL, Eidelman LA (1996) Worldwide similarities and differences in the forgoing of life-sustaining treatments. Intensive Care Med 22:1003–1005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Prendergast TJ, Luce JM (1997) Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 155:15–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Decruyenaere J, De Deyne C, Poelaert J, Colardyn F (1995) Morbidity or mortality as end-point for clinical trials in intensive care (letter). Lancet 345:986–987

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sibbald WJ, Vincent JL (1995) Round table conference on clinical trials for the treatment of sepsis. Brussels, March 12–14, 1994. Intensive Care Med 21:184–189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vincent JL (1997) New therapies in sepsis. Chest 112:S330–S338

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vincent, JL. (1999). Is Mortality the Only Outcome Measure in ICU Patients?. In: Gullo, A. (eds) Anaesthesia, Pain, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine — A.P.I.C.E.. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2145-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2145-7_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0051-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2145-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics