Advertisement

How Risky Are Cellular Telephones for Patients Implanted with a Pacemaker or ICD?

  • M. Gulizia
  • M. Santomauro
  • S. Mangiameli
Conference paper

Abstract

Mobile telephones are today the most universal means of communication that has ever existed, with widespread distribution and use of these devices. Problems relating to electromagnetic interference from mobile telephones in permanently paced patients or those with ICDs implanted are very much under discussion at present and the subject arouses strong interest not only among physicians but also among the public.

Keywords

Cellular Phone Electromagnetic Interference Mobile Telephone Cellular Telephone Reed Switch 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Furman S, Parker B, Krauthammer J et al (1968) The influence of electromagnetic environment on the performance of artificial cardiac pacemakers. Ann Thorac Surg 6:90–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barbaro V, Bartolini P, Donato A et al (1994) GSM cellular phones interference withimplantable pacemakers: in vitro in vivo observations. Presented at the1994 Bioelectromagnetic Society conference. Copenhagen, June 1994Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Joiner KH, Anderson V, Wood MP (1994) Interference and energy deposition rates from digital mobile phones. Proceedings of the Bioelectromagnetic Society Copenhagen, June 1994, p 67Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eicher B, Ryser H, Knsfl U et al (1994) Effects of TDMA-modulated hand-held telephones on pacemakers. In: Proceedings of the Biochectromagnetic Society Copenhagen, June 1994, p 67 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carrillo R, Saunkeah B, Pickels M et al (1995) Preliminary observations on cellular telephones and pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 18:863 (abstr)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hayes DL, VonFeldt L, Neubauer S et al (1995) Effect of digital cellular phones on permanent pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 18:863 (abstr)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ehlers C, Andresen D, Brüggemann T et al (1995) Functional pacemaker interference by mobile phones. Eur Heart J 16:5 (abstr)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Irnich W (1996) Mobile telephones and pacemakers. [Guest editorial] Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19:1407–1409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Antonioli GE, Guardigli G, Holzl A et al (1998) Unusual pro-arrhythmic effects in implantable cardiac pacemakers induced by mobile phones interference. Proceedings of the 13th International Congress: The “New Frontiers” of Arrhythmias. G Ital Cardiol28 [Suppl 1]:193–195Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Irnich W, Lothar B, Müller R et al (1996) Electromagnetic interference of pacemakers by mobile phones. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19:1431–1446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hayes DL, Carrillo RG, Gretchen KF et al (1996) State of the science: pacemaker and defibrillator interference from wireless communication devices. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19:1419–1430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barbaro V, Bartolini P, Donato A et al (1995) Do European GSM mobile cellular phones pose a potential risk to pacemaker patients? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 18:1218–1224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barbaro V, Bartolini P, Donato A et al (1996) Electromagnetic interference of analog cellular telephones with pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19:1410–1418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nowak B, Rosocha S, Zeilerhoff C et al (1996) Is there a risk for interaction between mobile phones and single lead VDD pacemakers? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19:1447–1450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sparks PB, Mond HG, Joyner KH et al (1996) The safety of digital mobile cellular telephones with minute ventilation rate adaptive pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19:1451–1455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilke A, Grimm W, Funck R et al (1996) Influence of D-Net (European GSM Standard) cellular phones on pacemaker function in 50 patients with permanent pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19:1456–1458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Altamura G, Gentilucci G, Pandozi C et al (1998) Electromagnetic or myopotential interferences: how to abolish them? In: Proceedings of the International Symposium “Progress in Clinical Pacing”. Futura, Armonk, NY, pp 345–350Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Santomauro M, Amendolara A, Costanzo A et al (1997) Cellular phones and pacemakers: how do they interact? In: Raviele A (ed) Cardiac Arrhythmias. Springer, Milan, pp 514–521Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fetter JG, Benditt DG, Stanton MS (1996) Electromagnetic interference from welding and motors on implantable cardioverter-defibrillators as tested in the electrically hostile work site. J Am Coll Cardiol 28:423–427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mclvor ME (1995) Environmental electromagnetic interference from electronic article surveillance devices: interactions with an ICD. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 18:2229–2230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fetter JG, Ivans V, Benditt DG et al (1998) Digital cellular telephone interaction with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. J Am Coll Cardiol 31:623–628PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bassen H, Moore HJ, Ruggera PS (1998) Cellular phone interference testing of implantable cardiac defibrillators in-vitro. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 21:1709–1715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Occhetta E, Plebani L, Sacchetti G et al (1998) Evaluation of cellular phones electromagnetic interferences on implantable cardioverter defìbrillators functioning. Proceedings of the 13th International Congress: The “New Frontiers” of Arrhythmias. G Ital Cardiol 28 [Suppl 1]:195–199Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Anonymous (1998) Zeropa Handbook and technical features. Harvest Lodge Limited, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Manning MI (1999) SAR and efficiency tests of “Zeropa” devices using three different mobile telephones. SARTest Report 64/99, SARTEST Ltd, Newdigate, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Gulizia
    • 1
  • M. Santomauro
    • 2
  • S. Mangiameli
    • 1
  1. 1.Cardiologia con UTICAz. Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale “G. Garibaldi”CataniaItaly
  2. 2.Reparto di Cardiologia e CardiochirurgiaUniversità Federico IINaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations