Does Baroreflex Sensitivity Add Something to Noninvasive Evaluation of Post-Infarction Patients?

  • M. T. La Rovere
Conference paper


In patients recovering from acute myocardial infarction considerable attention has been given for many years to noninvasive measurements of parameters that can identify high risk groups in which further investigation and intervention are needed. The extent of coronary artery disease and of myocardial damage as assessed by exercise stress test and determination of left ventricular ejection fraction together with the presence of electrical instability indentified by the results of 24-h Holter recording have been recognized as the most important pathophysiological determinants of prognosis after myocardial infarction. However, changes in life style and therapeutic interventions have modified the profile of patients with acute myocardial infarction, and the attending improvement in post-discharge survival has affected our ability to identify high risk patients by the use of traditional means.


Heart Rate Variability Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Ventricular Fibrillation Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Baroreflex Sensitivity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Remme WJ (1998) The sympathetic nervous system and ischemic heart disease. Eur HeartJ 19[Suppl F]:F62–F71Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    MullerJE, AbelaGS, Nesto RW, Tofler GH (1994) Triggers, acute risk factors and vulnerableplaques: the lexicon of a new frontier. J Am Coll Cardiol 23: 809–813PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    CorrPB, Yamada KA, Witkowski FX (1986) Mechanisms controlling cardiac autonomicfunction and their relation to arrhythmogenesis. In: Fozzard HA, HaberE,Jennings RB etal(eds) The heart and cardiovascular system. Raven Press, New York, pp 1343–1403Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    LombardiF, Verrier RL, Lown B (1983) Relationship between sympathetic neural activity,coronary dynamics and vulnerability to ventricular fibrillation duringmyocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Am Heart J 105: 958–965PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DeFerrariGM, Vanoli E, Schwartz PJ (1995) Cardiac vagal activity, myocardial ischemiaand sudden death. In: Zipes DP, Jalife J (eds) Cardiac electrophysiology. Fromcell to bedside, 2nd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, pp 422–434Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    SmythHS,SleightP, Pickering GW (1969) Reflex regulation of arterial pressure during sleep inman: a quantitative method for assessing baroreflex sensitivity. Circ Res24:109–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    MitraniRD, Miles WM, Klein LS, Zipes DP (1998) Phenylephrine increases T wave shockenergy required to induce ventricular fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol9:34–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    La Rovere MT, Mortara A, Specchia G,Schwartz PJ (1988) Baroreflex sensitivity, clinical correlates andcardiovascular mortality among patients with a first myocardial infarction. Aprospective study. Circulation 78:816–824Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Billman GE, Schwartz PJ, Stone HL (1982) Baroreceptor control of heart rate: apredictor of sudden cardiac death. Circulation 66:874–879PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    SchwartzPJ, Vanoli E, Stramba-BadialeM, De Fearrari GM,Billman GE, Foreman RD (1988) Autonomic mechanisms and sudden death. Newinsights from analysis of baroreceptor reflexes in conscious dogs with andwithout a myocardial infarction. Circulation 78:969–979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kleiger RE, Miller JP, Bigger JT Jr, Moss AJ, TheMulticenter Postinfarction Research Group (1987) Decreased heart ratevariability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardialinfarction. Am J Cardiol 59:256–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Farrell TG, Odemuyiwa O, Bashir Y, Cripps TR, Malik M,Ward DE, Camm AJ (1992) Prognostic valueof baroreflex sensitivity testing after acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J67:129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    LaRovere MT, Bigger JT Jr, Marcus FI, Mortara A, Schwartz PJ for the ATRAMI (AutonomieToneand Reflexes After Myocardial Infarction) Investigators (1998) Baroreflexsensitivity and heart rate variability in prediction of total cardiac mortalityafter myocardial infarction. Lancet 351:487–484Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    BiggerJT Jr, La Rovere MT, Steinman RC, Fleiss JL, Rottman JN, Rolnitzky LM, SchwartzPJ (1989) Comparison of baroreflex sensitivity and heart period variabilityafter myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 14:1511–1518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    La Rovere MT, Mortara A, Bigger JT Jr, Marcus FI, MalikM, Hohnloser SH, Schwartz PJ (1999)Baroreflex sensitivity contributes to the risk stratification of patientsconsidered for a prophylactic implantable cardioverter defìbrillator. Eur HeartJ (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. T. La Rovere
    • 1
  1. 1.Divisione di CardiologiaFondazione “S. Maugeri”, IRCCS, Centro Medico MontescanoPaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations