Advertisement

Ablation of Antero-Septal and Intermediate Septal Accessory Pathways: How Safe Is It? How Can One Minimize the Risk of AV Block?

  • R. De Ponti
  • C. Storti
  • M. Zardini
  • M. Tritto
  • M. Longobardi
  • P. Fang
  • J. A. Salerno-Uriarte
Conference paper

Abstract

The current goal of radiofrequency catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardias is to cure a large cohort of patients with a primary success rate close to 100% and a complication and recurrence rate close to 0%. In this setting, the ablation of the atrioventricular (A-V) accessory pathway in the triangle of Koch may still represent a grey area, since the strict anatomical relationship between the bypass tract and the A-V node-His bundle may affect the feasibility and safety of the procedure. Consequently, the only rationale for successful ablation with no complication in this area relies on the assumption that the accessory pathway is more sensitive to radiofrequency energy delivery than the normal A-V conduction system [1]. The risk of damaging the normal A-V conduction pathway and of inducing a complete A-V block requiring a permanent pacemaker has been pointed out by both early [2, 3] and recent [4–6] reports, although successful and safe ablation has been described in limited series of cases [7, 8], even with “para-hissian” accessory pathways [1]. Moreover, in the risk/benefit ratio of ablation of by-pass tracts in the Koch’s triangle one must consider not only failure and the risk of permanent complete A-V block, but also the theoretical possibility of creating an incessant reentrant circuit by partially damaging both the accessory pathway and the A-V node conduction.

Keywords

Catheter Ablation Accessory Pathway Right Bundle Branch Block Successful Ablation Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Haïssaguerre M, Marcus F, Poquet F, Gencel L, Le Metayer P, Clementy J (1994) Electrocardiographic characteristics and catheter ablation of para-hissian accessory pathways. Circulation 90:1124–1128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yeh SJ, Wang CC, Wen MS, Lin FC, Koo CC, Lo YS, Wu D (1994) Characteristics and radiofrequency ablation therapy of intermediate septal accessory pathway. Am J Cardiol 73:50–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xie B, Heald SC, Bashir Y, Camm AJ, Ward DE (1994) Radiofrequency catheter ablation of septal accessory atrioventricular pathways. Br Heart J 72:281–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schaffer MS, Silka MJ, Ross BA, Kugler JD (1996) Inadverted atrioventricular block during radiofrequency catheter ablation. Results of the Pediatric Radiofrequency Ablation Registry. Pediatric Electrophysiology Society. Circulation 94:3214–3220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brugada J, Puigfel M, Mont L, Garcia-Bolao I, Figueiredo M, Matas M, Navarro-Lopez F (1998) Radiofrequency ablation of anteroseptal, para-Hisian, and mid-septal accessory pathways using a simplified femoral approach. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 21:735–741PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lin JL, Huang SK, Lai LP, Cheng TF, Tseng YZ, Lien WP (1998) Radiofrequency catheter ablation of septal accessory pathways within the triangle of Koch: importance of energy titration testing other than local electrogram characteristics for identifying the successful target site. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 21:1909–1917PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kuck KH, Schluter M, Gursoy S (1992) Preservation of atrioventricular nodal conduction during radiofrequency current ablation of midseptal accessory pathways. Circulation 86:1743–1752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schluter M, Kuck KH (1992) Catheter ablation from right atrium of antero-septal accessory pathways using radiofrequency current. J Am Coll Cardiol 19:663–670PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Storti C, Salerno JA, Stanke A, De Ponti R, Ferrari A, Longobardi M (1994) Junctional area mapping for radiofrequency catheter ablation of the fast pathway in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 17:846Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ho SY, Anderson RH (1998) Anatomy of the accessory pathways: are there lessons relevant to radiofrequency catheter ablation? In: Farrè J, Moro C (eds) Ten years of radiofrequency catheter ablation. Futura, Armonk, NY, pp 149–163Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Belhassen B, Viskin S, Fish R, Glick A, Glikson M, Eldar M (1999) Catheter induced mechanical trauma to accessory pathways during radiofrequency ablation: incidence predictors and clinical implications. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:767–774PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Langberg JJ, Calkins H, El-Atassi R, Borganelli M, Leon A, Kalbfleisch SJ, Morady F (1992) Temperature monitoring during radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways. Circulation 86:1469–1474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Salerno JA, De Ponti R, Storti C, Zardini M, Tritto M, Longobardi M (1999) Focal atrial tachycardia originating from the apex of the Koch’s triangle: a weak arrhythmogenic substrate in a risky site? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 22:845Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Twidale N, Wang XZ, Beckman KJ, McClelland JH, Moulton KP, Prior MI, Hazlitt HA, Lazzara R, Jackman WM (1991) Factors associated with recurrence of accessory pathway conduction after radiofrequency catheter ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 14:2042–2048PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Calkins H, Prystowsky E, Berger RD, Saul JP, Klein LS, Liem LB, Huang SK, Gillette P, Yong P, Carlson M (1996) Recurrence of conduction following radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures: relationship to ablation target and electrode temperature. The Atakr Multicenter Investigators Group. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 7:704–712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vassilikos VP, Ho, SY, Wong CY, Nathan AW (1997) Recurrence of accessory pathway conduction after successful radiofrequency ablation: histological findings. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 1:311–315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. De Ponti
    • 1
  • C. Storti
    • 2
  • M. Zardini
    • 1
  • M. Tritto
    • 1
  • M. Longobardi
    • 2
  • P. Fang
    • 1
  • J. A. Salerno-Uriarte
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto di Cardiologia “Mater Domini”Università degli Studi dell’InsubriaCastellanza, (VA)Italy
  2. 2.Divisione di CardiologiaIstituto “Città di Pavia”PaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations