Skip to main content

How to Predict and Avoid Complete AV Block Complicating Radiofrequency Ablation of AV Nodal Slow Pathway

  • Conference paper
Cardiac Arrhythmias 1999

Abstract

Slow pathway ablation is currently used to cure common and uncommon A-V node reentrant tachycardia (AVN RT). The technique has a success rate of about 100% and a 0.5%–2% risk of inadvertent complete AV block [1–4]. Although the risk of block is low, it is difficult to tolerate in patients with a benign arrhythmia, especially when they are young.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Haissaguerre M, Gaita F, Fischer B et al (1992) Elimination of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia using discrete slow potentials to guide application of radiofre-quency energy. Circulation 85:2162–2175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jackman WM, Beckman KJ, McClelland JH et al (1992) Treatment of supraventricular tachycardia due to atrioventricular nodal reentry by radiofrequency catheter ablation of slow-pathway conduction. N Engl J Med 327:313–318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu D, Yeh S-J, Wang C-C, Wen M-S, Lin F-C (1993) A simple technique for selective radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway in atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 21:1612–1621

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hindricks G, on behalf of the MERFS investigators of the Working Group on Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology: The Multicenter European Radiofrequency Survey (MERFS) (1993) Complication of radiofrequency catheter ablation of arrhythmias. Eur Heart J 14:1644–1653

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Thakur RK, Klein GJ, Yee R, Stites HW (1993) Junctional tachycardia: a useful marker during radiofrequency ablation for atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 22:1706–1710

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hintringer F, Hartikainen J, Davies W et al (1995) Prediction of atrioventricular block during radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway of the atrioventricular node. Circulation 92:3490–3496

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Inoue S, Becker AE (1998) Posterior extensions of the human compact atrioventricular node. A neglected anatomic feature of potential clinical significance. Circulation 97:188–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Anselme F, Hook B, Monahan K et al (1996) Heterogeneity of retrograde fast-pathway conduction pattern in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia. Observations by use of simultaneous multisite catheter mapping of Koch’s triangle. Circulation 93:960–968

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Reithmann C, Hoffmann E, Grunewald A et al (1998) Fast pathway ablation in patients with common atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and prolonged PR interval during sinus rhythm. Eur Heart J 19:929–935

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ridgen LB, Klein LS, Mitrani RD et al (1995) Increased risk of heart block following slow pathway ablation for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia in patients with marked PR interval prolongation during sinus rhythm. PACE 18:II–918

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sra JS, Jazayeri MR, Blank Z et al (1994) Slow pathway ablation in patients with atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia and a prolonged PR interval. J Am Coll Cardiol 24:1064–1068

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Delise P, Themistoclakis S, Corò L et al (1996) Radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardias: which results and predictors of success and recurrence? In: Raviele A (ed) Cardiac arrhythmia. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 177–180

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this paper

Cite this paper

Delise, P. et al. (2000). How to Predict and Avoid Complete AV Block Complicating Radiofrequency Ablation of AV Nodal Slow Pathway. In: Raviele, A. (eds) Cardiac Arrhythmias 1999. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2139-6_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2139-6_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2178-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2139-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics