Advertisement

Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: What’s All the Fuss About?

  • D. G. Wyse
Conference paper

Abstract

The topic of atrial fibrillation after recent cardiac surgery has been one of intense interest for at least the past decade. Entire books have been written on this subject [1]. The reasons behind such intense interest are not entirely clear. However, the major driving factor seems to be the demonstrated relationship between post-operative atrial fibrillation and length of stay in hospital after surgery. Particularly in North America, there is a tremendous financial incentive to shorten the length of stay in hospital after cardiac surgery. The “current wisdom” is that if atrial fibrillation can be prevented, the average length of stay in hospital after cardiac surgery will be shortened. In the opinion of this author, the “current wisdom” is extremely naïve, unlikely to be correct and a more pragmatic approach would be preferable in the quest to shorten length of stay after cardiac surgery. The reasons for this opinion will be outlined below.

Keywords

Atrial Fibrillation Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Rhythm Control Stroke Risk Factor American Heart Association Task 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery, (2000), Ed. J. Steinberg, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, USA, 02061Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aranki SF, Shaw DP, Adams DH et al (1996) Predictors of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery. Current trends and impact on hospital resources. Circulation 94:390–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fuster V, Ryden LE, Asinger RW et al (2001) ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the mana-gement of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conferences (Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation). Circulation 104:2118–2150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bruins P, Velthuis H, Yazdanbakhsh AP et al (1997) Activation of the complement system during and after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery: postsurgery activation involves C-reactive protein and is associated with post-operative arrhythmia. Circulation 96:3542–3548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crystal E, Connolly SJ, Sleik K, Ginger TJ, Yusuf S (2002) Interventions on prevention of post-operative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing heart surgery: a metaanalysis. Circulation 106:75–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Myers MG, Alnemri K (1998) Rate control therapy for atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass surgery. Can J Cardiol 14:1363–1366PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hohnloser SH, Kuck KH, Lilienthal J (2000) Rhythm or rate control in atrial fibrillation-Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation (PIAF): a randomized trial. Lancet 356:1789–1794PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    The AFFIRM Investigators (2002) A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with a trial fibrillation. New Engl J Med 347:1825–1833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    van Gelder IC, Hagens VE, Bosker HA et al (2002) A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation. New Engl J Med 347:1834–1840PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. G. Wyse
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Cardiology, Department of Cardiac SciencesUniversity of Calgary/Calgary Health RegionCanada

Personalised recommendations