Atrial Fibrillation Suppression: What Role Does It Have?

  • A. Schuchert
Conference paper


Present-day pacemaker therapy is not only used to prevent bradycardia or asystole in cases of advanced AV block or sick sinus syndrome. More recent proposed indications for permanent cardiac pacing are the prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure.


Atrial Fibrillation Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Atrial Arrhythmia Atrial Pace 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Andersen HR, Nielsen JC, Thomsen PEB et al (1997) Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick sinus syndrome. Lancet 350:1210–1216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Connolly SJ, CR Kerr, M Gent et al (2000) Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med 342:1385–1391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lamas GA, Lee KL, Sweeney MO et al (2002) Mode selection trial in sinus-node dysfunction ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction. N Engl J Med 346:1854–1862PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Attuel P, Pellerin D, Muciga J, Coumel PH (1988) DDD pacing: an effective treatment modality for recurrent atrial arrhythmias. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 11:1647–1654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garrigue S, Barold SS, Cazeau S et al (1998) Prevention of atrial arrhythmias during DDD pacing by atrial overdrive. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 21:1751–1759PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Saksena S, Prakash A, Ziegler P et al, for the DAPPAF Investigators (2002) Improved suppression of recurrent atrial fibrillation with dual-site right atrial pacing and antiarrhythmic drug therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 40:1140–1150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carlson MD, Gold MR, Ip J et al, for the ADOPT Investigators (2001) Dynamic atrial overdrive pacing decreases symptomatic atrial arrhythmia burden in patients with sinus node dysfunction. Circulation 104:II-1-II-1088Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beinhauer A, Vock P, Nobis H et al (2001) AF suppression by atrial dynamic overdrive pacing in the ADOPT-ALL trial. P2965. Eur Heart J 22 Abstr Suppl 554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee MA, Weachter R, Pollak S et al for the ATTEST Investigators (2003) The effect of atrial pacing therapies on atrial tachyarrhythmias burden and frequency. J Am Coll Cardiol 41:1926–1932PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Padeletti L, Purerfellner H, Adler S et al (2002) Atrial septal lead placement and atrial pacing algorithms for prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: ASPECT study results. NASPE Abstract no 659Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP et al, The Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Investigators (2002) A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 347:1825–1833PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van Gelder IC, Hagens VE, Bosker HA et al, the Rate Control versus Electrical Cardioversion for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Study Group (2002) Comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 347:1834–1840PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Schuchert
    • 1
  1. 1.Medical Clinic IIIHamburg-Eppendorf University HospitalHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations