Advertisement

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Is Atrial Resynchronization Important with Biventricular Pacing?

  • F. Di Pede
  • G. Gasparini
  • M. Celestre
  • G. Zuin
  • B. De Piccoli
  • A. Raviele
Conference paper

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy performed with biventricular pacing has been recognized as one of the most promising techniques in the treatment of patients with congestive heart failure [1–3]. Many papers demonstrate significant hemodynamic improvement in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and left bundle branch block treated with VDD biventricular pacing and shortened atrioventricular (AV) delays [1–4]. The concept is that biventricular pacing may be an effective pacing modality by synchronizing contraction of the right and left ventricles, leading to improvement of cardiac performance and reduction of mitral régurgitation. Some authors have emphasized the importance of optimization of the stimulation site during ventricular resynchronization therapy and concluded that a posterior/lateral/posterior- lateral left ventricle lead position in combination with a right ventricle apex lead position provides more consistent hemodynamic improvements [5]. Recently published trials have shown a substantial improvement in symptoms, cardiac function, and functional capacity and a less consistent effect on hospitalization, but no convincing evidence for a reduction in cardiac mortality [4]. However, cardiac resynchronization probably is not yet optimal, and many technical and physiopathological concepts are under debate. The subject of this paper is the importance of atrial resynchronization and, consequently, the importance of optimization of the AV delay on both the right and the left sides of the heart.

Keywords

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Atrial Appendage Atrial Pace Biventricular Pace Interatrial Septum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Blanc JJ, Etienne Y, Gilard M et al (1997) Evaluation of different ventricular pacing sites in patients with severe heart failure. Circulation 93:3273–3277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leclercq C, Cazeau S, Le Breton H et al (1998) Acute emodynamic effects of biventri-cular DDD pacing in patients with end stage heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 32:1825–1831PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, Block M et al (1999) Effect of pacing chamber and atrio-ventricular delay on acute systolic function of paced patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation 99:2993–3001PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cleland JGF, Ghosh J, Khan NK et al (2003) Multi-chamber pacing: a perfect solution for cardiac mechanical dyssynchrony? Eur Heart J 24:384–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Auricchio A, Butter C, Stellbrink C et al (2000) Effect of left ventricular stimulation site on the systolic function of heart failure patients during ventricular resynchroni-zation therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 23(4part II):589 (abstract 147)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ritter P, Dib JC, Lelievre T et al (1994) Quick determination of the optimal AV delay at rest in patients paced in DDD mode for complete AV block. Eur JCPE 4:A163Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Linde C, Leclerq C, Rex S et al (2002) Long-term benefits of biventricular pacing in congestive heart failure: results from the multisite stimulation in cardiomyopathy study. J Am Coll Cardiol 40:111–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Di Salvo TG, Mathier M, Semigran MJ, Dec GW (1995) Preserved right ventricular ejection fraction predicts exercise capacity and survival in advanced heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 25:1143–1153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Groote P, Millaire A, Foucher-Hossein C et al (1998) Right ventricular ejection fraction is an independent predictor of survival in patients with moderate heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 32:948–954PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ghio S, Gavazzi A, Campana C et al (2001) Independent and additive prognostic value of right ventricular systolic function and pulmonary artery pressure in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:183–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Porciani M C, Sabini A, Colella A et al (2002) Interatrial septum pacing avoids the adverse effect of interatrial delay in biventricular pacing: an echo Doppler study. Europace 4:317–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parravicini U, Mezzani A, Bielli M (2000) DDD pacing and interatrial conduction block: importance of optimal AV interval setting. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 23:1448–1450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kindermann M, Schwaab B, Berg M, Fröhling G (2000) The influence of right atrial septal pacing on the interatrial contraction sequence. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 23:1752–1753PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Di Pede
    • 1
  • G. Gasparini
    • 1
  • M. Celestre
    • 1
  • G. Zuin
    • 1
  • B. De Piccoli
    • 1
  • A. Raviele
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of CardiologyUmberto I HospitalMestre-VeniceItaly

Personalised recommendations