Advertisement

Which Left Ventricular Stimulation Site Is Best for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy?

  • F. Nacci
  • F. Fino
  • E. Spennati
  • V. F. Napoli
  • S. Favale
Conference paper

Abstract

In the last few years, cardiac resynchronisation therapy has been proposed as a way of restoring a physiological interventricular and left intraventricular activation sequence in patients with severely symptomatic left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and left bundle branch block (LBBB). In this population haemodynamic and clinical benefits have been confirmed.

Keywords

Right Ventricular Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Leave Bundle Branch Block Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Biventricular Pace 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Grines CL, Bashore TM, Boudoulas H (1989) Functional abnormalities in isolated left bundle branch block. Circulation 79:845–853PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hultgren HN, Craige E, Fujii J (1983) Left bundle branch block and mechanical events of the cardiac cycle. Am J Cardiol 52:755–762PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Takeshita A, Basta LL, Kioschos JM (1974) Effect of intermittent left bundle branch block on left ventricular performance. Am J Med 56:251–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kingma I, Tyberg JV, Smith ER (1983) Effects of diastolic transseptal pressure gradient on ventricular septal position and motion. Circulation 68:1304–1314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bramlet DA, Morris KG, Coleman RE et al (1983) Effect of rate-dependent left bundle branch block on global and regional left ventricular function. Circulation 67:1059–1065PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bourassa MG, Boiteau GM, Allenstein BJ (1962) Hemodynamic studies during intermittent left bundle branch block. Am J Cardiol 10:792–799PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Herman MV, Heinle RA, Klein MD et al (1967) Localized disorders in myocardial contraction: asynergy and its role in congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 277:222–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vassallo JA, Cassidy DM, Miller JM et al (1986) Left ventricular endocardial activation during right ventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 7:1228–1233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hatala R, Savard P, Trembòay G et al (1995) Three distinct patterns of ventricular activation in infarcted human hearts: an intraoperative cardiac mapping study during sinus rhythm. Circulation 91:1480–1494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blanc JJ, Etienne Y, Gilard M et al (1997) Evaluation of different ventricular pacing sites in patients with severe heart failure. Circulation 96:3273–3277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leclercq C, Cazeau S, Le Breton H et al (1998) Acute hemodynamic effects of biventri-cular DDD pacing in patients with end-stage heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 7:1825–1831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kass DA, Chen C, Curry C et al (1999) Improved left ventricular mechanisms from acute VDD pacing in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and ventricular conduction delay. Circulation 99:1567–1573PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, Sack S et al (1999) The pacing therapies for congestive heart failure (PATH-CHF) study: rationale design, and endpoints of a prospective randomized multicenter study. Am J Cardiol 83:130D–135DPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Auricchio A, Klein H, Tockman B et al (1999) Transvenous biventricular pacing for heart failure: can the obstacles be overcome? Am J Cardio 83:136D–142DCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cazeau S, Leclercq C, Lavergne T et al (2001) Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay. N Engl J Med 344:873–880PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL et al (2002) Cardiac resynchronization therapy in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 346:1845–1853PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (2002) Contak CD Guidant cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator system including the CONTAK CD pulse generator and the EASYTRAK left ventricular coronary venous lead. Summary of safety and effectiveness. www.fda.goGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    ( 2001) Medtronic Insync ICD cardiac resynchronization system. www.fda.govGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stellbrink C, Breithardt O, Franke A et al (2001) Impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy using hemodynamically optimized pacing on left ventricular remodeling in patients with congestive heart failure and ventricular conduction disturbances. J Am Coll Cardiol 38:1957–1965PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Abraham W, Hayes D, Sackner-Bernstein J et al (2002) Cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces the risk of hospitalization for heart failure and the length of stay: results from the MIRACLE trial (abstract). Eur Heart J 23 [Suppl]:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, Sack S et al (2002) Long-term clinical effect of hemodynamically optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and ventricular conduction delay. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:2026–2033PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Linde C, Leclercq C, Rex S et al (2002) Long-term benefits of biventricular pacing in congestive heart failure: results from the multisite stimulation in cardiomyopathy (MUSTIC) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 40:111–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J et al (2003) ACC Late-breaker preliminary results. Communication, March 2003.http://www.acc.org
  24. 24.
    Cazeau S, Ritter P, Lazarus A et al (1996) Multisite pacing for end-stage heart failure: early experience. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19:1748–1757PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ricci R, Ansalone G, Toscano S et al (2000) Cardiac resynchronization: materials, technique and results. The InSync Italian Registry. Eur Heart J 2 [Suppl J]:J6–15Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pappone C, Auricchio A, Schalij M et al (2001) Can transvenous left ventricular leads be used as standard treatment for heart failure patients? The European experience with the first 1000 over-the-wire lead implants (abstract). Pacing Clin Electrophysio 24:619Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Baker CM, Christopher TJ, Smith PF et al (2002) Addition of a left ventricular lead to conventional pacing systems in patients with congestive heart failure: feasibility, safety, and early results in 60 consecutive patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 25:1166–1171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Nacci
    • 1
  • F. Fino
    • 1
  • E. Spennati
    • 2
  • V. F. Napoli
    • 3
  • S. Favale
    • 1
  1. 1.U.O. di Cardiochirurgia, Dipartimento di Emergenza e Trapianti d’OrganoItaly
  2. 2.Presidio Ospedaliero CivileDivisione di CardiologiaOstuniItaly
  3. 3.IRCCS “S. Maugeri”Divisione di CardiologiaCassano MurgeItaly

Personalised recommendations