Advertisement

Upgrading from Right Ventricular Apical Pacing to Biventricular Pacing

  • M. H. Schoenfeld
Conference paper

Abstract

It has been estimated that approximately 5% of the population worldwide suffers from congestive heart failure, of whom up to 30% may also have ventricular dyssynchrony resulting from intraventricular conduction delay [1, 2]. Recent work has demonstrated that biventricular pacing may be undertaken to achieve cardiac resynchronization, with resulting improvement in acute hemo-dynamics [3,4] and sustained amelioration of heart failure symptoms [5–7]. A recent meta-analysis also indicates that cardiac resynchronization reduces mortality from progressive heart failure in patients with symptomatic impairment in left ventricular function [8], and recently reported late-breaking trials from the COMPANION investigators, as yet unpublished, substantiate this impression [9]. What remains unclear is the prevalence of symptomatic heart failure in patients with ventricular dyssynchrony due to right ventricular apical pacing, and whether revision to biventricular pacing in these patients will afford symptomatic relief and/or improved survival. It is the purpose of this chapter to assess the role of cardiac resynchronization in patients with paced rhythm from the right ventricular apex.

Keywords

Left Bundle Branch Block Ventricular Outflow Tract Ventricular Pace Chronic Atrial Fibrillation Biventricular Pace 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Havranek EP, Masoudi FA, Westfall KA et al (2002) Spectrum of heart failure in older patients: results from the national heart failure project. Am Heart J 143:412–417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kalinchak DM, Schoenfeld MH (2003) Cardiac Resynchronization: A Brief Synopsis, Part I: Patient Selection and Results from Clinical Trials. Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology (in press) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blanc JJ, Etienne Y, Gilard M et al (1997) Evaluation of different ventricular pacing sites in patients with severe heart failure: results of an acute hemodynamic study. Circulation 996:3273–3277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leclercq C, Cazeau S, LeBreton H et al (1998) Acute hemodynamic effects of biventri-cular DDD pacing in patients with end-stage heart failure J Am Coll Cardiol 32:1825–1831.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cazeau S, Leclercq C, Lavergne T et al (2001) Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay. N Engl J Med 344:873–880PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Linde C, Leclercq C, Rex S et al (2002) Long-term benefits of biventricular pacing in congestive heart failure: results from the Multi-site Stimulation in Cardiomyopathy (MUSTIC) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 40:111–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL et al (2002) Cardiac resynchronization in heart failure. N Engl J Med 346:1845–1853PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bradley DJ, Bradley EA, Baughman KL et al (2003) Cardiac resynchronization and death from progressive heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA 289:754–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cleland JGF, Thackray S, Goodge L et al (2002) Outcome studies with device therapy in patients with heart failure. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 13 (suppl):S73–S91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boucher CA, Pohost GM, Okada RD et al (1983) Effect of ventricular pacing on left ventricular function assessed by radionuclide angiography. Am Heart J 106:1105–1111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tantengco MV, Thomas RL, Karpawich PP (2001) Left ventricular dysfunction after long-term right ventricular apical pacing in the young. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:2093–2100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paxinos G, Katritsis D, Kakouros S et al (1998) Long-term effect of VVI pacing on atrial and ventricular function in patients with sick sinus syndrome. PACE 21:728–734PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blanc JJ, Etienne Y, Gilard M et al (1997) Evaluation of different ventricular pacing sites in patients with severe heart failure: results of an acute hemodynamic study. Circulation 96:3273–3277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hamdan MH, Zagrodzky JD, Joglar JA et al (2000) Biventricular pacing decreases sympathetic activity compared with right ventricular pacing in patients with depressed ejection fraction. Circulation 102:1027–3210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xiao HB, Brecker SJ, Gibson DG (1993) Differing effects of right ventricular pacing and left bundle branch block on left ventricular function. Br Heart J 69:166–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Patel AG, Singh A (2003) Resynchronization therapy produces greater improvement in left ventricular function in patients with pacer induced compared to those with intrinsic left bundle branch block. J Am Coll Cardiol (abs):l–13AGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Andersen HR, Nielsen JC, Thomsen PE et al (1997) Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomized trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet 350:1210–1216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nielsen JC, Andersen HR, Thomsen PE et al (1998) Heart failure and echocardio-graphic changes during long-term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to single-chamber atrial or ventricular pacing. Circulation 97:987–995PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wood MA, Brown-Mahoney C, Kay GN, Ellenbogen KA (2000) Clinical outcomes after ablation and pacing therapy for atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. Circulation 101:1138–1144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ozcan C, Jahangir A, Friedman PA et al (2001) Long-term survival after ablation of the atrioventricular node and implantation of a permanent pacemaker in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 344:1043–1051PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Szili-Torok T, Kimman GP, Theuns D et al (2002) Deterioration of left ventricular function following atrio-ventricular node ablation and right ventricular apical pacing with permament atrial fibrillation. Europace 4:61–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Connolly SJ, Kerr CR, Gent M et al (2000) Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med 342:1385–1391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lamas GA, Lee KL, Sweeney MO (2002) Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction. N Engl J Med 346:1854–1862PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    The DAVID Trial Investigators (2002) Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator. The Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator. (DAVID) Trial JAMA 288:3115–3123Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Leon AR, Greenberg JM, Kanuru N et al (2002) Cardiac resynchronization in patients with congestive heart failure and chronic atrial fibrillation: effect of upgrading to biventricular pacing after chronic right ventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:1258–1263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Erol-Yilmaz A, Tukkie R, Schrama TA et al (2002) Reversed remodeling of dilated left sided cardiomyopathy after upgrading from VVIR to VVIR biventricular pacing. Europace 4:445–449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Leclercq C, Walker S, Linde C et al (2002) Comparative effects of permanent biventricular and right-univentricular pacing in heart failure patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 23:1780–1787PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mayumi H, Kohno H, Yasui et al (1996) Use of automatic mode change between DDD and AAI to facilitate native atrioventricular conduction in patients with sick sinus syndrome or transient atrioventricular block. PACE 19:1740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Linde C (1997) The clinical utility of positive and negative AV/PV hysteresis In: Santini M (ed) Progress in Clinical Pacing 1996 Armonk, NY. Futura Media Services pp 339–345Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Leclerq C, Gras D, LeHelloco A et al (1995) Hemodynamic importance of preserving the normal sequence of ventricular activation in permanent cardiac pacing. Am Heart J 129:1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Baker CM, Christopher TJ, Smith PF et al (2002) Addition of a left ventricular lead to conventional pacing systems in patients with congestive heart failure: feasibility, safety, and early results in 60 consecutive patients. PACE 25:1166–1171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kalinchak DM, Schoenfeld MH (2003) Cardiac Resynchronization: A Brief Synopsis Part II: Implant and Follow-up Methodology. I Interventional Cardiac Electrophys (in press) Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Victor F, Leclercq C, Mabo P et al (1999) Optimal right ventricular pacing site in chronically implanted patients: a prospective randomized crossover comparison of apical and outflow tract pacing. J Am CollCardiol 33:311–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Buckingham TA, Candinas R, Schlapfer J et al (1997) Acute hemodynamic effects of atrioventricular pacing at differing sites in the right ventricle individually and simultaneously PACE 20:909–915PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ et al (2002) Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction N Engl J Med 346:877–883PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. H. Schoenfeld
    • 1
  1. 1.Yale University School of MedicineCardiac Electrophysiology and Pacer Laboratory, Hospital of Saint RaphaelNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations