Cardiac Resynchronisation and Haemodynamic Monitoring: the Living-CHF Study

  • J. Clémenty
  • Best-Care Study Group
Conference paper


Since multisite stimulation was first performed in heart failure (HF) [1], a few specific devices have been designed with capabilities for providing separated output control of pacing parameters for the right and left ventricular leads, as well as inter ventricular (VV) sequence programming. So far, there are no haemodynamic sensors to improve understanding of and follow up the effects of biventricular (BiV) stimulation and help in the programming of the resyn-chronisation parameters. In the meantime, Sorin Biomedica has developed the Living-BEST system, which is based on a sensor that is able to measure the amplitude of mechanical vibrations generated by the myocardium during the isovolumetric contraction of ventricles. The peak of endocardial acceleration (PEA) reflects events that produce vibrations that originate mainly in the left ventricle and are transmitted through the cardiac mass [2, 3]. It has been shown that PEA is correlated with contractility indexes, such as dP/dtmax, and is influenced by catecholamine levels. PEA variations are related to the capability of the myocardium to respond to adrenergic stresses. Human experiments [4,5] have shown that PEA variation is greater during exercise with biventricular pacing than compared with to other modes, and it has been suggested that PEA might be used as a marker for selecting the position of ventricular pacing leads that provides the best haemodynamic effect. The version of the Living-BEST system designed specifically for biventricular pacing (Living CHF) has the capability of recording amplitudes and timings of PEA and providing realtime telemetry of the whole endocardial acceleration signal. Secondly, the device has the VV Interval programming feature, which can influence the efficacy of resynchronisation provided by biventricular stimulation. Recent studies [6–13] have been focused on improving understanding of the effects of cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Biventricular stimulation provides a more homogeneous contraction of ventricles, which becomes faster and allows prolongation of the diastolic filling phase. Filling pressures are reduced with the frequent reduction in the mitral valve regurgitation. The most relevant parameter is the aortic pre-ejection interval [14], which has to become shorter to predict the beneficial effect of biventricular stimulation, and also the shortening in the contraction timing of the uncoordinated ventricular segments. In this context the use of a haemodynamic sensor is an interesting possibility as an analytic tool for the evaluation and optimisation of ventricular resynchronisation therapy.


Ventricular Pace Biventricular Pace Left Ventricular Lead Mitral Valve Regurgitation Ventricular Lead 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Cazeau S, Ritter P, Bakdach S et al (1994) Four-chamber pacing in dilated cardiomyo-pathy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 17:1974–1979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rickards AF, Bombardini T, Corbucci G, Plicchi G (1996) An implantable intracardiac accelerometer for monitoring myocardial contractility. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19:2066–2071PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Occhetta E, Perucca A, Corbucci G, Garberoglio B, Liverani L, Plicchi G (1995) Experience with a new myocardial acceleration sensor during dobutamine infusion and exercise test. Eur J CPE 5:204–209Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Padeletti L, Porciani MC, Ritter P et al (2000) Atrioventricular interval optimization in the right atrial appendage and interatrial septum. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 23:1618–1622PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reuter S, Garrigue S, Bordachar P et al (2002) Assessment of left ventricular pacing versus biventricular pacing in heart failure patients during exercise by using a hemodynamic sensor. Europace Cardiostim 3:A176Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bordachar P, Garrigue S, Reuter S et al (2000) Importance of QRS duration during multisite ventricular stimulation in heart failure: a hemodynamic noninvasive study using peak endocardial acceleration measurements. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 23(II):636Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bordachar P, Garrigue S, Reuter S et al (2000) Hemodynamic assessment of right, left and biventricular pacing by peak endocardial acceleration and echocardiography in patients with end-stage heart failure. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 23:1726–1730PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cazeau S, Ritter P, Lazarus A et al (1996) Multisite pacing for end-stage heart failure: Early experience. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19:1748–1757PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reuter S, Garrigue S, Bordchar P et al (2000) Intermediate-term results of biventricular pacing in heart failure: correlation between clinical and hemodynamic data. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 23:1713–1717PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jaïs P, Takahashi A, Garrigue S et al (2000) Mid-term follow-up of endocardial biventricular pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 23:1744–1747PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lau C, Yu C, Chau E et al (2000) Reversal of left ventricular remodeling by synchronous biventricular pacing in heart failure. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 23:1722–1725PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gras D, Mabo P, Tang T et al (1998) Multisite pacing as a supplemental treatment of congestive heart failure: preliminary results of the Medtronic Inc. InSync Study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 21:2249–2255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leon A, Delurgio D, Fisher W et al (2001) Long term performance of a left ventricular lead to provide cardiac resynchronization. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 24:643Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cazeau S, Leclercq C, Lavergne T et al (2001) Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay. N Engl J Med 344:873–880PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dupuis JM, Kobeissi A, Vitali L et al (2003) Programming optimal atrioventricular delay in dual chamber pacing using peak endocardial acceleration. Comparison with a standard echo cardiographic procedure. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 26(II):210–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Clémenty
    • 1
  • Best-Care Study Group
    • 1
  1. 1.Hôpital CardiologiqueUniversité de BordeauxPessacFrance

Personalised recommendations