Skip to main content

Normal-Appearing White Matter Changes in Multiple Sclerosis: Magnetization Transfer

  • Chapter
Normal-appearing White and Grey Matter Damage in Multiple Sclerosis

Part of the book series: Topics in Neuroscience ((TOPNEURO))

  • 126 Accesses

Abstract

Magnetization exchange is a physicochemical mechanism which generally occurs between protons within a tissue. With appropriate techniques this mechanism can be used to augment tissue contrast and, even more importantly, to explore specific tissue characteristics [1]. One such approach is to saturate only a certain proton species and thereby to determine its contribution to a given tissue from the observed signal reduction, commonly known as “saturation transfer”. This is understood best when biological tissue is considered as consisting of at least two kinds of protons that differ in their molecular mobility, i.e. a pool of motionally restricted protons — those bound to macromolecules such as myelin proteins and lipids of brain tissue — and another pool of freely mobile protons in tissue water. The different mobility of these protons is reflected by different transverse relaxation times and hence by different spectral line widths. The free water protons with little spin-spin interaction have a very narrow spectral line width. In contrast, macromolecular protons, due to their diverse interactions, have a very broad line width which can be up to 100 kHz (Fig. 1). If a train of short radiofrequency (RF) saturation pulses is applied with a RF offset and band width that partly matches the shape of the absorption line of the macromolecular protons, these macromolecular protons will become saturated. By various mechanisms this saturation is partly transferred to the “MR-visible” water protons, thus “magnetization transfer” (MT).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wolff S, Balaban R (1994) Magnetization transfer imaging:practical aspects and clinical applications. Radiology 192:593–599

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sled J, Pike G (2001) Quantitative imaging of magnetization transfer exchange and relaxation properties in vivo using MRI. Mag Reson Med 46:923–931

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Filippi M (2003) Magnetization transfer MRI in multiple sclerosis and other central nervous system disorders. Eur J Neurol 10:3–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ropele S, Filippi M, Valsasina P et al (2003) Assessment and correction of Blinduced errors in multicentre magnetization transfer studies [Abstract]. Mult Scler 9 (Suppll):S 60

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dousset V, Gayou A, Brochet B, Caillé JM (1998) Early structural changes in acute MS lesions assessed by serial magnetization transfer studies. Neurology 51:1150–1155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Filippi M, Rocca MA, Comi G (1998) Magnetization transfer ratios of multiple sclerosis lesions with variable durations of enhancement. J Neurol Sci 159:162–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. van Waesberghe JH, van Walderveen MA, Castelijns JA et al (1998) Patterns of lesion development in multiple sclerosis: longitudinal observations with Tl-weighted spinecho and magnetization transfer MR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19:675–683

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bitsch A, Kuhlmann T, Stadelmann C et al (2001) A longitudinal MRI study of histopathologically defined hypointense multiple sclerosis lesions. Ann Neurol 49:793–796

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. van Buchem M, McGowan JC, Lokcon DL et al (1996) Quantitative volumetric magnetization transfer analysis in multiple sclerosis: estimation of macroscopic and microscopic disease burden. Magn Reson Med 36:632–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Filippi M, Grossman RI, Comi G (eds) (1999) Magnetization transfer imaging in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 53(Suppl 3)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Filippi M, Campi A, Dousset V et al (1995) A magnetisation transfer imaging study of normal-appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 45:478–482

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Filippi M, Rocca MA, Martino G et al (1998) Magnetization transfer changes in the normal appearing white matter precede the appearance of enhancing lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 43:809–814

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Goodkin D, Rooney WD, Sloan R et al (1998) A serial study of new MS lesions and the white matter from which they arise. Neurology 51:1689–1697

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pike GB, De Stefano N, Narayanan S et al (2000) Multiple sclerosis: magnetization transfer MR imaging of white matter before lesion appearance on T2-weighted images. Radiology 215:824–830

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ropele S, Strasser-Fuchs S, Augustin M et al (2000) A comparison of magnetization transfer ratio, magnetization transfer rate, and the native relaxation time of water protons related to relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:1885–1891

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fazekas F, Ropele S, Enziger C et al (2002) Quantitative magnetization transfer imaging of pre-lesional white-matter changes in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 8:479–484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Filippi M, Iannucci G, Tortorella C et al (1999) Comparison of MS clinical phenotypes using conventional and magnetization transfer MRI. Neurology 52:588–594

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rovaris M, Bozzali M, Santuccio G et al (2001) In vivo assessment of the brain and cervical cord pathology of patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain 124:2540–2549

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Filippi M, Inglese M, Rovaris M et al (2000) Magnetization transfer imaging to monitor the evolution of MS: a 1-year follow-up study. Neurology 55:940–946

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kalkers N, Hintzen RQ, van Waesberghe JH et al (2001) Magnetization transfer histogram parameters reflect all dimensions of MS pathology, including atrophy. J Neurol Sci 184:155–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Iannucci G, Tortorella C, Rovaris M et al (2000) Prognostic value of MR and magnetization transfer imaging findings in patients with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis at presentation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:1034–1038

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaiser J, Grossman RI, Polansky M et al (2000) Magnetization transfer histogram analysis of monosymptomatic episodes of neurologic dysfunction: preliminary findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:1043–1047

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Brex P, Leary SM, Plant GT et al (2001) Magnetization transfer imaging in patients with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:947–951

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Traboulsee A, Dehmeshki J, Brex PA et al (2002) Normal-appearing brain tissue MTR histograms in clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of MS. Neurology 59:126–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Siger-Zajdel M, Filippi M, Selmaj K (2002) MTR discloses subtle changes in the normal-appearing tissue from relatives of patients with MS. Neurology 58:317–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lassmann H (2001) Classification of demyelinating diseases at the interface between etiology and pathogenesis. Curr Opin Neurol 14:253–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ropele S, Stollberger R, Hartung HP, Fazekas F (2000) Estimation of magnetization transfer rates from PACE experiments with pulsed RF saturation. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:749–756

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ramani A, Dalton C, Miller DH et al (2002) Precise estimate of fundamental in-vivo MT parameters in human brain in clinically feasible times. Magn Reson Imaging 20:721–731

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Filippi M, Rocca MA, Pagani E et al (2004) European Study on Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Multiple Sclerosis (ESIMS). Results of magnetization transfer MRI analysis. Arch Neurol (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Inglese M, van Waesberghe JH, Rovaris M et al (2003) The effect of interferon betalb on quantities derived from MT MRI in secondary progressive MS. Neurology 60:853–860

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fazekas, F., Enzinger, C., Ropele, S. (2004). Normal-Appearing White Matter Changes in Multiple Sclerosis: Magnetization Transfer. In: Comi, G., Filippi, M., Rovaris, M. (eds) Normal-appearing White and Grey Matter Damage in Multiple Sclerosis. Topics in Neuroscience. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2127-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2127-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2175-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2127-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics