Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography in the Assessment of Patients with Chronic Coronary Artery Disease

  • Leopoldo Pérez de Isla
  • Miguel Angel García Fernández
  • José Luis Zamorano


Echocardiography has been established as a very important tool for imaging the heart and the great vessels. It is readily available to cardiologists and is neither expensive nor time consuming. Similar data can be obtained using other techniques, but none of them is able to provide all the structural, functional and haemodynamic information that echocardiography does. The development of new contrast agents and new devices and methods for assessing myocardial perfusion has led to an emerging field of applications and indications for patients suffering from chronic ischaemic heart disease. Myocardial contrast echocardiography is now moving from the experimental laboratory to daily clinical practice for the evaluation of ischaemic heart disease, since the assessment of myocardial perfusion with this technique may provide important information at low additional cost.


Myocardial Perfusion Myocardial Blood Flow Coronary Stenosis Contrast Echocardiography Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Jayaweera AR, Edwards N, Glasheen WP, et al. Invivo myocardial kinetics of air filled albumin microbubbles during myocardial contrast echocardiography: comparison with radiolabeled red blood cells. Circ Res. 1994;74:1157–1165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ismail S, Jayaweera AR, Camarano G, et al. Relation between air-filled albumin microbubble and red blood cell rheology in the human myocardium: influence of echo cardiographic systems and chest wall attenuation. Circulation. 1996;94:445–451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    American Society of Echocardiography Task Force on Standards and Guidelines for the use of ultrasonic contrast in echocardiography. Contrast echocardiography: current and future applications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000; 13: 331–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wei K, Skyba DM, Fischke C et al. Interaction between microbubbles and ultrasound: in vitro and in vivo observations. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 1081–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kaul S. Myocardial contrast echocardiography, 15 years of research and development. Circulation 1997; 96: 3745–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Skyba DM, Camarano G, Goodman NC, et al: Hemodynamic characteristics, myocardial kinetics, and microvascular rheology of FS-069, a second-generation echocardiographic contrast agent capable of producing myocardial opacification from a venous injection. J Am Coll Cardiol 28:1292–1300, 1996PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Keller MW, Segal SS, Kaul S, Duling B: The behavior of sonicated albumin microbubbles within the microcirculation: A basis for their use during myocardial contrast echocardiography. Circ Res 65:458–467, 1989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wei K, Jayaweera AR, Firoozan S et al. Basis for detection of stenosis using venous administration of microbubbles during myocardial contrast echocardiography: bolus or continuous infusion? J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 252–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Colon PJ, Richards DR, Moreno CA et al. Benefits of reducing the cardiac cycle-triggering frequency of ultrasound imaging to increase myocardial opacification with FS069 during fundamental and second harmonic imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1997; 10: 602–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tiemann K, Lohmeier S, Kuntz S, et al. Real-time contrast echo assessment of myocardial perfusion at low emission power: first experimental and clinical results using power pulse inversion imaging. Echocardiography 1999;12:266–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hope Simpson D, Chin CT, Burns PN. Pulse inversion Doppler: a new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents. IEEE Trans UFFC 1999;46:372–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kassab GS, Lin DH, Fung YB. Morphometry of pig coronary venous system. Am J Physiol 267:H2100–2113,1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Skyba DM, Jayaweera AR, Goodman NC, et al. Quantification of myocardial perfusion with myocardial contrast echocardiography during left atrial injection of contrast. Implications for venous injection. Circulation 90:1513–1521, 1994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaul S. Myocardial contrast echocardiography.Curr Probl Cardiol 22:549–640, 1997PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Villanueva FS, Glasheen WP, Skienar J, et al: Successful and reproducible myocardial opacification during two-dimensional echocardiography from right heart injection of contrast. Circulation 86:1557–1564, 1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Le E, Bin JP, Coggins MP, et al: Increase in myocardial oxygen consumption increases myocardial blood volume: A study using myocardial contrast echocardiography. Circulation 1001–450, 1999 (abstr)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wei K, Jayaweera AR, Firoozan S, et al: Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. Circulation 97:473–483, 1998PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wei K, Le E, Bin JP, Coggins M et al. Quantification of renal blood flow with contrast enhanced ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1135–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schlosser T,Pohl C,Veltmann C et al. Feasibility of the flash replenishment concept in renal tissue: which parameters affect the assessment of the contrast replenishment? Ultrasound Med Biol 2001;27:937–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Köster J, Schlosser T, Pohl C et al. Blood flow assessment by ultrasound-induced destruction of echocontrast agents using harmonic power Doppler imaging: which parameters determine contrast replenishment curves? Echocardiography 2001; 18: 1–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gould KL, Lipscomb K. Effects of coronary stenosis on coronary flow reserve and resistance. Am J Cardiol;34:48–55, 1974PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lafitte S, Matsugata H, Peters B, et al. Comparative value of dobutamine and adenosine stress in the detection of coronary stenosis with myocardial contrast echocardiography. Circulation 2001;103:2724–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wei K, Ragosta M, Thorpe J et al. Non-invasive quantification of coronary blood flow reserve in humans using myocardial contrast echocardiography. Circulation 2001; 103:2560–2565PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jarhult J, Mellander S. Autoregulation of capillary hydrostatic pressure in skeletal muscle during regional arterial hypo-and hypertension. Acta Phsyiol Scand 1974; 91:32–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jayaweera AR, Wei K, Coggins M, et al: The role of capillaries in determining coronary blood flow reserve. New insights using myocardial contrast echocardiography. Am J Physiol 1999; 6:1-12363–2372Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kaul S, Senior R, Dittrich H et al. Detection of coro nary artery disease with myocardial contrast echocardiography: comparison with 99m Te-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 1997; 96: 785 92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Heinle SK, Noblin J, Goree-Best P et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion by harmonic power Doppler imaging at rest and during adenosine stress. Circulation 2000; 102: 55–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shimoni S, Zoghbi WA, Xie F et al. Real-time assessment of myocardial perfusion and wall motion during bicycle and treadmill exercise echocardiography:Comparison with single photon emission computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 741–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Porter TR, Xie F, Silver M et al. Real-time perfusion imaging with low mechanical index pulse inversion Doppler Imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 748–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Folts JD, Gallagher K, Rowe GG. Hemodynamic effects of controlled degrees of coronary stenosis in short term and log term studies in dogs. J Thorac CV Surg 1977; 73:722–727Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wei K, Coggins M, Bin J-P, et al. Phasic changes in video intensity can be used to detect coronary stenois at rest without need for stress. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999 (supplA);33:450AGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leopoldo Pérez de Isla
  • Miguel Angel García Fernández
  • José Luis Zamorano

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations