From a Toy with Lots of Potential to a Useful Clinical Tool—The Oxford Way of Doing Contrast Echocardiography

  • Jonathan Timperley
  • Helene Thibault
  • Harald Becher


There have been a large number of experimental and clinical studies demonstrating a variety of applications of ultrasound contrast agents. Although there has been a con- vergence of opinions over the last few years, there is still some debate on the practical clinical issues including indications, choice of contrast agent, best imaging modality etc. Many papers and presentations conclude that the use of contrast has huge potential (Table 14.1) [1], but concrete guidelines on how to integrate the technology into a busy clinical echocardiography laboratory are lacking. There are only a few well-controlled multicentre studies which are based on good blind reads, but the protocols of these stud- ies performed in academic (tertiary) centres are not suitable for echocardiography laboratories in district general hospitals.


Myocardial Perfusion Wall Motion Perfusion Imaging Perfusion Defect Wall Motion Abnormality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Mulvagh SL, DeMaria A, Feinstein SB et al. Contrast echocardiography: current and future applications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000; 13: 331–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nanda NC, Wistran DC, Karlsberg RP et al. Multicenter evaluation of SonoVue for improved endocardial border delineation. Echocardiography 2002; 19: 27–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oraby MA, Hays J, Maklady FA, El-Hawary AA, Yaneza LO, Zabalgoitia M. Comparison of real-time coherent contrast imaging to dipyridamole thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography for assessment of myocardial perfusion and left ventricular wall motion. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 90(5): 449–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thanigaraj S, Schechtman KB, Perez JE et al. Improved echocardiographic delineation of left ventricular thrombus with the use of intravenous second-generation contrast image enhancement. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1999; 12: 1022–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lepper W, Shivalkar B, Rinkevich D et al: Assessment of the vascularity of a left ventricular mass using myocardial contrast echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002; 15(11): 1419–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Porter T, Xie F, Silver M, Kricsfeld et al. Real-time perfusion imaging with low mechanical index pulse inversion Doppler imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 748–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shimoni S, Zoghbi WA, Xie F et al. Real-time assessment of myocardial perfusion and wall motion during bicycle and treadmill exercise echocardiography: Comparison with single photon emission computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 741–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Waggoner AD, Ehler D, Adams D et al. Guidelines for the cardiac sonographer in the performance of contrast echocardiography: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography Council on Cardiac Sonography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2001; 14: 417–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Becher H, Burns PN. Handbook of contrast echocar-dioraphy. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag 2000Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tardif JC, Dore A, Chan KL et al. Economic impact of contrast stress echocardiography on the diagnosis and initial treatment of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002; 15(11): 1335–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan Timperley
  • Helene Thibault
  • Harald Becher

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations