Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography and Inflammatory Response
In recent years, myocardial contrast echocar diography (MCE) has undergone many advances through remarkable developments in echocardiographic contrast agents pharmacodynamics and ultrasound technology [1–7]. The use of MCE has nowadays clear clinical indications, such as cardiac cavities opacification, improved endocardial border definition and quantification of myocardial perfusion. Recently, major progress has been made in MCE application for myocardial perfusion, especially under acute ischaemia and postischaemic conditions [1–3].
KeywordsAcute Myocardial Infarction Contrast Echocardiography Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography Endothelial Wall Coronary Endothelial Cell
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 6.Skyba DM, Camarano G, Goodman NC, Price RJ, Skalat TC, Kaul S. Hemodynamics characteristics, myocardial kinetics and microvascular rheology of FS-069, a second generation echocardiographic contrast agent capable of producing myocardial opacification from a venous injection. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 1292–1300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Lindner JR, Dayton PA, Coggins MP, LeyK, Song J, Ferrara K, Kaul S. Non-invasive imaging of inflammation by ultrasound detection of phagocytosed microbubles. Circulation 2000; 102: 531/538Google Scholar
- 15.Christiansen JP, Song J, Matsunaga T, Lindner JR. Microbubbles targeted to the platelet IIb/IIIa integrin adhere to microvascular thrombi in vivo (abstract). Circulation 2001; 102305Google Scholar
- 16.Lanza GM, Wallace KD, Scott MJ, Cacheris WP, Abendschein DR, Christy DH, Sharkey AM, Miller JG, Gaffney PJ, Wickline SA. A novel site-targeted ultrasonic contrast agent with broad biomedical application. Circulation 1997; 95: 3334–3340Google Scholar
- 19.Lindner JR, Coggins MP, Kaul S, Klibanov AL, Brandenburger GH, Key K. Microbubble persistence in the microcirculation during ischemia/reperfusion and inflammation is caused by integrin-and complement-mediated adherence to activated leucocytes. Circulation 2000 Feb 15; 101(6): 668–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.J. Monge, J. Cortez, M.H. Custódio, L. Bronze, M. Vieira, J. Azevedo, A. Aleixo, M.G. Morais. Contrast echocardiography and its relationship with the intensity of the inflammatory response in the acute phase of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2002; Vol 14, Abstr. Suppl.-Pag 715 (abstract)Google Scholar
- 22.Hiser W, Porter T, Li S, Deligonul U, Rice J, Kilzer K, Radio S. Inhibition of carotid artery neointimal formation after balloon injury using ultrasound targeted deposition of antisense to c-myc protooncogene bound to intravenously delivered perfluoro-carbon microbubbles (abstract). J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1998; 11: 498Google Scholar
- 23.Newman CM, Lawrie A, Brisken AF, Cumberland DC. Ultrasound gene therapy: on 24. Bao S, Thrall BD, Miller DL. Transfection of a reposter plasmid into cultured cells by sonoporation in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol 1997; 23: 943–959Google Scholar
- 27.Christiansen JP, French BA, Matsumura M, Klibanov Lindner JR. Transfection of plasmid DNA in muscle tissue with ultrasound and cationic microbubble vesicles (abstract). J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2001; 14: 426Google Scholar
- 28.Skyba Dm, Price RJ, Linka AJ, Skalak TC, Kaul S. Direct in vivo visualisation of intravascular destruction of microbubbles by ultrasound and its local effects on tissue. Circulation; 98: 290–293Google Scholar