Skip to main content

Repeat Third Ventriculostomy

  • Chapter
Pediatric Hydrocephalus

Abstract

The methods of treating hydrocephalus underwent a dramatic evolution in the last few decades. The initial enthusiasm of the neurosurgical community after years of using shunts as the only treatment of all kinds of hydrocephalus faded despite the fact that dozens of studies have been conducted, and hundreds of significant and seemingly panacean solutions were proposed to improve shunt technology. The reality remains that the overall survival of a shunt and the complication rate have changed only slightly in the last 10–20 years. It seems natural that the alternatives to placement of hardware have been long looked for, and the advent of modern neuroendoscopy in the mid-1980s opened a new page in the history of the war against hydrocephalus, which eventually turned into a war against shunts as well. Endoscopic third ventriculostomies (ETV) have instantly become very popular. ETV is a relatively simple technique, establishes a “natural” pathway for CSF flow, and may help to avoid placement of and reliance upon hardware. ETV is generally considered a safe and effective alternative for patients with triventricular hydrocephalus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abtin K, Thompson BG, Walker ML: Basilar artery perforation as a complication of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Pediatr Neurosurg 28:35–41, 1998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brockmeyer D, Abtin K, Carey L, et al: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: an outcome analysis. Pediatr Neurosurg 28:236–240, 1998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Buxton N, Vloeberghs M, Punt J: Liliequist’s membrane in minimally invasive endoscopic neurosurgery. Clin Anat 11:187–190, 1998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cinalli G: Alternatives to shunting. Child’s Nerv Syst 15:718–731, 1999

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cinalli G, Sainte-Rose C, Chumas P, et al: Failure of third ventriculostomy in the treatment of aqueductal stenosis in children. J Neurosurg 90:448–454, 1999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cinalli G, Sainte-Rose C, Simon I, et al: Sylvian aqueduct syndrome and global rostral midbrain dysfunction associated with shunt malfunction. J Neurosurg 90:227–236, 1999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cinalli G, Salazar C, Mallucci C, et al: The role of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the management of shunt malfunction. Neurosurgery 43:1323–1327; discussion 1327–1329, 1998

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen AR: Images in clinical medicine. Endoscopic laser third ventriculostomy. N Engl J Med 328:552, 1993

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ellenbogen RG, Moores LE: Endoscopic management of a pineal and suprasellar germinoma with associated hydrocephalus: technical case report. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 40:13–15; discussion 16, 1997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferrer E, Santamarta D, Garcia-Fructuoso G, et al: Neuroendoscopic management of pineal region tumours. Acta Neurochir 139:12–20, 1997

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gaab MR, Schroeder HW: Neuroendoscopic approach to intraventricular lesions. J Neurosurg 88:496–505, 1998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gangemi M, Maiuri F, Donati P, et al: Neuroendoscopy. Personal experience, indications and limits. J Neurosurg Sci 42:1–10, 1998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Grant JA, McLone DG: Third ventriculostomy:a review. Surg Neurol 47:210–212, 1997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Handler MH, Abbott R, Lee M: A near-fatal complication of endoscopic third ventriculostomy: case report. Neurosurgery 35:525–527; discussion 527–528, 1994

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hopf NJ, Grunert P, Fries G, et al: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: outcome analysis of 100 consecutive procedures. Neurosurgery 44:795–804; discussion 804–806, 1999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jimenez D: Third ventriculostomy. In: Jimenez D (ed) Intracranial endoscopic neurosurgery. American Association of Neurological Surgeons, 108, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jones RF, Kwok BC, Stening WA, et al: The current status of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the management of non-communicating hydrocephalus. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 37:28–36, 1994

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jones RF, Stening WA, Brydon M: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Neurosurgery 26:86–91; discussion 91–92, 1990

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kehler U, Gliemroth J, Knopp U, et al: How to perforate safely a resistant floor of the 3rd ventricle? Technical note. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 41:198–199, 1998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kobayashi N, Kamikawa S, Miyake S, et al: [Treatment of hydrocephalus without shunt placement: third ventriculostomy]. No Shinkei Geka 25:35–40, 1997

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. McLaughlin MR, Wahlig JB, Kaufmann AM, et al: Traumatic basilar aneurysm after endoscopic third ventriculostomy: case report. Neurosurgery 41:1400–1403; discussion 1403–1404, 1997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mohanty A, Anandh B, Reddy MS, et al: Contralateral massive acute subdural collection after endoscopic third ventriculostomy — a case report. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 40:59–61, 1997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Robinson S, Cohen AR: The role of neuroendoscopy in the treatment of pineal region tumors. Surg Neurol 48:360–365; discussion 365–367, 1997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Siomin V, Cinalli G, Grotenhius A, et al: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in patients with cerebrospinal fluid infecton and/or hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 97:519–524, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tuli S, Alshali E, Drake JM: Third ventriculostomy versus cerebrospinal shunt as a first procedure in pediatric hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg 30:11–15, 1999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vandertop PW: Traumatic basilar aneurysm after endoscopic third ventriculostomy: case report. Neurosurgery 43:647–648, 1998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Vries JK: An endoscopic technique for third ventriculostomy. Surg Neurol 9:165–168, 1978

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Siomin, V., Constantini, S. (2005). Repeat Third Ventriculostomy. In: Cinalli, G., Sainte-Rose, C., Maixner, W.J. (eds) Pediatric Hydrocephalus. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2121-1_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2121-1_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2173-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2121-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics