The CISS Sequence in the Preoperative MRI Assessment of Neuroendoscopic Third Ventriculostomy

  • Norman S. McConachie


Neuroendoscopic third ventriculostomy (NTV) is a well-established technique for the management of patients with hydrocephalus [6, 10, 11–13]. It is of particular value for patients in need of long-term cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion who formerly often required frequent shunt revision [25]. Imaging has an important role in diagnosing the underlying cause of hydrocephalus. In addition, as the primary disease and the secondary changes from hydrocephalus and shunting can obscure the normal endoscopic intraventricular landmarks, imaging can provide anatomical information that helps to guide the surgical approach, identify potential hazards, and assist with selection of the type of neuroendoscope to be used. Moreover, those who are likely or unlikely to benefit from the procedure can be identified by, for instance, demonstrating dense basal arachnoiditis, which can compromise the success of NTV. Imaging also has an important role in the postoperative assessment of ventriculostomy patency [4],[7],[14],[16],[18].


Spin Echo Basal Cistern Mamillary Body Noncommunicating Hydrocephalus Magnetic Resonance Imaging Velocity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bradley WG, Kortman KE, Burgoyne DE: Flowing cerebrospinal fluid in normal and hydrocephalic states: appearances on MR images. Radiology 159:611–616,1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buxton N, Vloeberghs M, Punt JA: Liliequist’s membrane in minimally invasive endoscopic neurosurgery. Clin Anat 11:187–190,1998PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Casselman JW, Kuhweide R, Deimling M, et al: Constructive interference in the steady state (CISS)-3DFT MR imaging of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 14:47–57,1993PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fukuhara T, Vorster SJ, Ruggieri P, et al: Third ventriculostomy patency: comparison of findings at cine phase-contrast MR imaging and at direct exploration. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20:1560–1566,1999PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Govindappa SS, Narayanan JP, Krishnamoorthy VM, et al: Improved detection of intraventricular cysticercal cysts with the use of three-dimensional constructive interference in steady state MR sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:679–684,2000PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hirsch JF: Percutaneous ventriculocisternostomies in noncommunicating hydrocephalus. Monogr Neurol Sci 8:170–178,1982Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jack CR, Kelly PJ: Stereotactic third ventriculostomy: assessment of patency with MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 10:515–522,1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jaspan T, Costigan CM, McConachie NS, et al: New features of the Chiari II malformation demonstrated by ultra-high resolution CISS imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol (in press)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jaspan T, McConachie NS, Punt JA: Ultra-high resolution CISS imaging of the Chiari II malformation. Child’s Nerv Syst 14:663,1998Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jones RFC, Kwok BCT, Stening WA, et al: Neuroendoscopic third ventriculostomy. A practical alternative to extracranial shunts in non-communicating hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir Suppl 61:79–83,1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jones RFC, Stening WA, Brydon M: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Neurosurgery 26:86–92,1990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jones RFC, Stening WA, Kwok BCT: Third ventriculostomy for shunt infections in children. Neurosurgery 32:855–860, 1993PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kelly PJ: Stereotactic third ventriculostomy in patients with nontumoral adolescent/adult onset aqueductal stenosis and symptomatic hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 75:865–873,1991PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Laitt RD, Mallucci CL, McConachie NS, et al: Constructive interference in steady state 3D Fourier-transform MRI in the management of hydrocephalus and third ventriculostomy. Neuroradiology 41:324–327,1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lemmerling M, De Praeter G, Mortele K, et al: Imaging of the normal pontine cisternal segment of the abducens nerve, using three-dimensional constructive interference in the steady state MRI. Neuroradiology 41:384–386,1999PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lev S, Bhadelia RA, Estin D, et al: Functional analysis of third ventriculostomy patency with phase-contrast MRI velocity measurements. Neuroradiology 39:175–179,1997PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liliequist B: The anatomy of the subarachnoid cisterns. Acta Radiol 46:61,1956PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Missir O, Dormont D, Pierot L: MR visualisation of CSF flow through a ventriculo-cisternostomy. Neuroradiology 31:93–94,1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nitz WR, Bradley WG, Watanabe AS, et al: Flow dynamics of cerebrospinal fluid: assessment with phase-contrast velocity MR imaging performed with retrospective cardiac gating. Radiology 183:395–405,1992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rovira A, Capellades J, Grive E, et al: Spontaneous ventriculostomy: report of three cases revealed by flow-sensitive phase-contrast cine MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20:1647–1652,1999PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sherman JL, Citrin CM: Magnetic resonance demonstration of normal CSF flow. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 7:3–6, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shigematsu Y, Korogi Y, Hirai T, et al: Virtual MRI endoscopy of the intracranial cerebrospinal fluid spaces. Neuroradiology 40:644–650,1998PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wilcock DJ, Jaspan T, Punt J: CSF flow through third ventriculostomy demonstrated with colour Doppler ultrasonography. Clin Radiol 51:127–129,1996PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wilcock DJ, Jaspan T, Worthington BS, et al: Neuro-endoscopie third ventriculostomy: evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Radiol 52:50–54,1997PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yamamoto M, Oka K, Ikeda K, et al: Percutaneous flexible neuroendoscopic ventriculostomy in patients with shunt malfunction as an alternative procedure to shunt revision. Surg Neurol 42:218–223,1994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yang D, Korogi Y, Ushio Y, et al: Increased conspicuity of intraventricular lesions revealed by three-dimensional constructive interference in steady state sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:1070–1072,2000PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norman S. McConachie
    • 1
  1. 1.Imaging CentreUniversity HospitalNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations