Invariants of Spin Networks with Boundary in Quantum Gravity and TQFTs

  • G. Carbone
  • M. Carfora
  • A. Marzuoli


The search for classical or quantum combinatorial invariants of compact n-dimensional manifolds (n = 3, 4) plays a key role both in topological field theories and in lattice quantum gravity (see, e.g., [1, 2, 3, 4]). We present here a generalization of the partition function proposed by Ponzano and Regge to the case of a compact 3-dimensional simplicial pair (M 3, ∂M 3). The resulting state sum Z[(M 3, ∂M 3)] contains both Racah-Wigner 6j symbols associated with tetrahedra and Wigner 3 jm symbols associated with triangular faces lying in ∂M 3. The analysis of the algebraic identities associated with the combinatorial transformations involved in the proof of the topological invariance makes manifest a common structure underlying the 3-dimensional models with empty and non-empty boundaries respectively. The techniques developed in the 3-dimensional case can be further extended in order to deal with combinatorial models for n = 2,4 and possibly to establish a hierarchy among such models. As an example we derive here a 2-dimensional closed state sum model including suitable sums of products of double 3 jm symbols, each of them being associated with a triangle in the surface.


Spin Variable Spin Network Topological Field Theory Inverse Move Empty Boundary 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ponzano G., Regge T. (1968): Semiclassical Limit of Racah Coefficients, in Spectroscopic and Group Theoretical Methods, ed. by F. Bloch, F. in Physics, pp. 1–58. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 1—58Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Turaev V., Viro O.Ya. (1992): State sum invariants of 3-manifolds and quantum 6j-symbols. Topology 31, 865–902MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ooguri H. (1992): Topological lattice models in four dimensions. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 7, 2799–2810MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carter J.S., Kauffman L.H., Saito M. (1998): Structure and diagrammatics of four dimensional topological lattice field theories. Preprint, math. GT/9806 023Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rourke C, Sanderson B. (1982): Introduction to Piecewise Linear Topology. Springer, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carbone G., Carfora M., Marzuoli A.: Wigner symbols and combinatorial invariants of three-manifolds with boundary. Preprint DFNT-T 14/98 and SISSA 118/98/FMGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yutsis A.P., Levinson LB., Vanagas V.V. (1962): The Mathematical Apparatus of the Theory of Angular Momentum. Israel Program for Sci. Transi. Ltd. JerusalemGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Regge T. (1961): General Relativity without coordinates. Nuovo Cimento 19, 558–571MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pachner U. (1987): Ein Henkeltheorem für geschlossene semilineare Mannigfaltigkeiten. Result. Math. 12, 386–394MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carter J.S., Flath D.E., Saito M. (1995): The Classical and Quantum 6j-Symbols. Math. Notes 43. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pachner U. (1990): Shellings of simplicial balls and p.l. manifolds with boundary. Discr. Math. 81, 37–47MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Varshalovich D.A., Moskalev A.N., Khersonski V.K. (1988): Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum. World Scientific, SingaporeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Carbone
  • M. Carfora
  • A. Marzuoli

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations