Indirect Control of Vagile Epifauna on Gracilaria verrucosa (Hudson) Papenfuss Growth: a Field Study in the Lesina Lagoon (FG), Italy

  • G. Mancinelli
  • P. Polimeno
  • L. Rossi


The effect induced by vague macrofauna on the growth of the Rhodophyta Gracilaria verrucasa (Huds.) was evaluated in the Lesina Lagoon (southern Italy) through an in situ manipulation experiment. Percent wet weight daily growth rates and percent ash content of pre-weighted G. verrucasa thalli were monitored for 28 days in enclosures made of nets with fine (220 μm “F” treatment) and medium mesh (2000 μ, “M” treatment). Both partial and total faunal exclusion treatments showed a significant negative variation of daily growth rates together with evident fouling phenomena confirmed by the percent total ash content analysis on Gracilaria samples. A further analysis on ash content of thalli fragments free from fouling organisms excluded any effective variation of macroalgal tissue ash content. The study highlighted a significant effect induced by vagile epifauna on G. verrucosa growth, accomplished through an indirect control on fouling organisms. Our results support, besides regeneration phenomena of nutrients necessary for growth induced by particulate detritus processing (widely documented in the literature), the hypothesis of a further, positive action of herbivorous-detritivorous macrofauna on macroalgal populations in salt marsh and coastal environments. The results, moreover, suggest a potentially effective control method on the quality of Gracilaria, which is extensively used as an agar source.


Salt Marsh Daily Growth Rate Indirect Control Fouling Organism Agar Source 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agnew DJ, Moore PG (1986) The feeding ecology of two littoral amphipods (Crustacea), Echinogammarus pirloti (Sexton and Spooner) and E. obtusatus (Dahl). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 103: 203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrontes J (1990) Diet, food preference and digestive efficiency in intertidal isopods inhabiting macroalgae. I Exp Mar Biol Ecol 139: 231–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brawley SH (1992) Mesoherbivores. In; John DM, Hawkins SJ, Price JH (eds) Plant-animal interactions in the marine benthos. Clarendon Press, Oxford, Pp 235–263Google Scholar
  4. Brawley SH, Fei XG (1987) Studies of mesoherbivory in aquaria and unbarricaded maricolture farm on the chinese coast. J Phycol 23: 614–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Costantini ML, Rossi L (1995) Role of fungal patchiness on vegetal detritus in the trophic interactions between two brackish detritivores, Idotea baltica and Gammarus insensibilis, Hydrobiologia 316: 117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. D’Antonio C (1985) Epiphytes on the rocky intertidal red alga Rhodomela larix (Turner) C. Agardth: negative effects on the host and food for herbivores? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 86: 197–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Benedictis A, Cardellicchio N, Guarino SM, De Nicola M (1996) Distribution of Fe, Zn, Cu and Cd in some organisms, water and sediment of the Lake of Lesina (Southern Italy). Ann Chim 86: 577–580Google Scholar
  8. Dinardo C, Gambardella C, Guarino SM, De Nicola M (1997) Reproductive biology of a Gammarus insensibilis Stock population living in the Lesina Lagoon. Biol Mar Medit 4; 377–379Google Scholar
  9. Duffy JE (1990) Amphipods on seaweeds; partners or pests? Oecologia 83; 267–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Friedlander M (1992) Gracilaria conferta and its epiphytes: the effect of culture conditions on growth. Bot Mar 35: 423–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Friedlander M, Weintraub N, Freedman A et al. (1996) Fish as potential biocontroller of Gracilaria (Rhodophyta) culture. Aquaculture 145; 113–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Friar JO (1979). Character displacement in Sphaeroma spp. (Isopoda; Crustacea). I. Field Evidence. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 1: 159–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haglund K, Pedersén M (1993) Outdoor pond cultivation of the subtropical marine red alga Gracilaria tenuistipitata in brackish water in Sweden. Growth, nutrient uptake, co-cultivation with rainbow trout and epiphyte control. J Appl Phycol 5:271–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harrison PG (1977) Decomposition of macrophyte detritus in seawater; effects of grazing by amphipods. Oikos 28:165–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hay ME, Duffy JE, Pfister CA, Fenical W (1987). Chemical defense against different marine herbivores; are amphipods insect equivalents? Ecology 68: 1567–1580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Healy B, O’Neill M (1984) The life cycle and population dynamics of Idotea pelagica and I. granulosa (Isopoda; Valvifera) in south-east Ireland. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 64: 21–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Howard RK, Short FT (1986) Seagrass growth and survivorship under the influence of epiphyte grazers. Aquat Bot 24: 287–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kittlein MJ (1991) Population biology of Sphaeroma serratum Fabricius (Isopoda, Flabellifera) at the Port of Mar del Plata, Argentina. J Nat Hist 25: 1449–1459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lincoln RJ (1979), British Marine Amphipoda; Gammaridea. British Museum (Nat Hist), LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Orth RJ, Van Montfrans J (1984) Epiphyte-segrass relationships with an emphasis on the role of micrograzing: a review. Aquat Bot 18; 43–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pavia H, Carr H, Aberg P (1999) Habitat and feeding preferences of crustacean mesoherbivores inhabiting the brown seaweeed Ascophyllum nadosum (L.) La Jol and its epiphytic macroalgae. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 236; 15–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Penniman CA, Mathieson AC, Penniman CE (1986) Reproductive phenology and growth of Gracilaria tikvahiae McLachlan (Gigartinales, Rodophyta) in the Great Bay Estuary, New Hampshire. Bot Mar 29: 147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pickering TD, Gordon ME, Tong LJ (1993) Effect of nutrient pulse concentration and frequency on growth of Gracilaria chilensis plants and levels of epiphytic algae. J Appl Phycol 5:525–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Polne M, Gibor A, Neushul M (1980) The use of ultrasounds for the removal of macro-algal epiphytes. Sot Mar 23: 731–734Google Scholar
  25. Poore AGB (1994) Selective herbivory by amphipods inhabiting the brown alga Zonaria angustata. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 107: 113–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Robertson AI, Mann KH (1980) The role of isopods and amphipods in the initial fragmentation of eelgrass detritus in Nova Scotia, Canada. Mar Biol 59:63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosa F, Bloesch J, Rathke DE (1994) Sampling the settling and suspended particulate matter. In: Mudroch A, McKnight SD (eds) Handbook of Techniques for Aquatic Sediment Sampling. Lewis Publishers, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 97–131Google Scholar
  28. Shacklock PF (1992) Biology of Idotea baltica in Chondrus aquacolture. J World Aquacol Soc 23: 241–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shacklock PF, Doyle RW (1983) Control of epiphytes in seaweed coltures using grazers. Aquacolture 31: 141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shaffelke B, Evers D, Walhorn A (1995) Selective grazing of the isopod Idotea baltica between Fucus evanescens and F. vesiculosus from Kiel Fjord (western Baltic). Mar Biol 124: 215–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sheader M (1996) Factors influencing egg size in the gammarid amphipod Gammarus insensibilis. Mar Biol 124:519–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sheader M, Sheader AL (1985) New distribution records for Gammarus insensibilis Stock, 1966, in Britain. Crustaceans 49:101–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Steentoft M, Irvine LM, Farnham WF (1995). Two terete species of Gracilaria and Gracilariopsis (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta) in Britain. Phycologia 34: 113–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wahl M (1989) Marine epibiosis. I. Fouling and antifouling some basic aspects. Mar Ecol Frog Ser 58:175–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Mancinelli
    • 1
  • P. Polimeno
    • 1
  • L. Rossi
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Genetica e Biologia Molecolare, Sezione EcologiaUniversità di Roma “La Sapienza”RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations