Advertisement

Percutaneous Extraction of Infected Pacemaker/ICD Leads: What Are the Current Technological Advances and Results?

  • M. G. Bongiorni
  • E. Soldati
  • G. Arena
  • G. Gherarducci
  • M. Ratti
  • M. Mariani
Conference paper

Abstract

Transvenous removal of permanent pacing and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads is today an effective and relatively safe technique; its use will probably spread in the future because of the increasing number of pacemaker- or ICD-related complications. Abandonment of functionless pacing leads is becoming relatively common because the performance of the leads decreases with the implant duration [1,2]. Infection is another complication of implanted devices; it is reported to occur in from 0% up to 19% of the patients [3,4]. Endocardial ICD leads seem to give rise to the same complications as pacing leads; in ICD patients lead malfunction may result in dangerously inappropriate therapy or none. Infections occurring after implantation of an ICD are reported at an incidence of 2%-7%. All these complications can be treated by percutaneous lead removal. The indications for the procedure have been codified [5, 6] and today’s techniques are effective. The success rate of transvenous removal in most reports is now more than 90%, with a low rate of serious, life-threatening complications. Despite these excellent results, however, efforts are still being made to improve both the techniques and the outcome of the procedures, in order to achieve better success rates and a lower incidence of complications.

Keywords

Lead Removal Pace Lead Lead Extraction Mechanical Dilation Transjugular Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Furman S, Behrens M, Andrews C et al (1987) Retained pacemaker leads. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 94:770–772PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zerbe P, Ponizynski A, Dyszkiewicz W et al (1985) Functionless retained pacing leads in the cardiovascular system. Br Heart J 54:76–79PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rettig G, Doenecke P, Sen S et al (1979) Complications with retained transvenous pacemaker electrodes. Am Heart J 98:587–594PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Parry G, Goudevenos J, Jameson S et al (1991) Complications associated with retained pacemakers leads. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 14:1251–1257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Byrd CL, Schwartz SJ, Hedin NB (1992) Lead extraction: indications and techniques. Cardiol Clin 10:735–748PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Love CJ, Wilkoff BL, Byrd CL et al (2000) Recommendations for extraction of chronically implanted transvenous pacing and defibrillator leads: indications, facilities, training. North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology Lead Extraction Conference Faculty. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 23:544–551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Byrd CL, Schwartz SJ, Hedin NB et al (1990) Intravascular lead extraction using locking stylets and sheaths. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 13:1871–1875PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Byrd CL, Schwartz S J, Hedin NB (1991) Intravascular techniques for extraction of permanent pacemakers leads. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 101:989–997PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bongiorni MG, Petz E, Levorato D et al (1991) Removal of chronic leads for permanent pacing. Clinical experience with transvenous extractors. In: Antonioli GE (ed) Pacemaker leads 1991. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 289–294Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bongiorni MG, Arena G, Soldati E, De Simone L (1994) A “step by step” protocol for lead extraction procedures: relation with success rate and complications. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol (abstr)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kennergren C, Schaerf RH, Sellers TD et al (2000) Cardiac lead extraction with a novel locking stylet. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 4:591–593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Byrd CL, Wilkoff BL, Love CJ et al (1999) Intravascular extraction of problematic or infected permanent pacemaker leads: 1994–1996. US Extraction Database, MED Institute. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 22:1348–1357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kantharia BK, Padder FA, Pennington JC et al (2000) Feasibility, safety and determinants of extraction time of percutaneous extraction of endocardial implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads by intravascular countertraction method. Am J Cardiol 85:593–597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reinhardt J, Alt E, Neuzner J et al (1993) Clinic pacemaker lead removal using a new method in 38 patients with 61 implanted leads. Multicenter experience. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 16:1175 (abstr)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Byrd C, Wilkoff B, Love C et al (1997) Clinical study of the laser sheath: results of the PLEXES trial. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 20:1053 (abstr)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilkoff BL, Byrd CL, Love CJ et al (1999) Pacemaker lead extraction with the laser sheath: results of the pacing lead extraction with the excimer sheath (PLEXES) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:1671–1676PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kennergren C (1997) Initial European experience with excimer laser assisted extraction of permanent pacemaker leads. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 20:1111 (abstr)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Parsonet V, Roelke M, Trivedi A et al (2001) Laser extraction of entrapped leads. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 24:329–332 (abstr)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Epstein LM, Byrd CL, Wilkoff BL et al (1999) Initial experience with larger laser sheaths for the removal of transvenous pacemaker and implantable defibrillator leads. Circulation 100:516–525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wilkoff BL (2000) Transvenous leads extraction with electrosurgical dissection sheaths. Initial experience. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 23:679–684Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bongiorni MG, Soldati E, Arena G et al (1998) The transvenous removal of permanent pacing and defibrillator leads: indications, methods and results. Cardiologia 43:1105–1109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Heidi JM, Neal EF, Byrd CL et al (1994) Five-years experience with intravascular lead extraction. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 17:2016–2020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Robboy SJ, Harthorne JW, Leinbach RC et al (1969) Autopsy findings with permanent pervenous pacemakers. Circulation 39:495–501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. G. Bongiorni
    • 1
  • E. Soldati
    • 1
  • G. Arena
    • 1
  • G. Gherarducci
    • 1
  • M. Ratti
    • 1
  • M. Mariani
    • 1
  1. 1.Interventional Arrhythmology Unit, Cardiothoracic Department, Cisanello HospitalUniversity of PisaItaly

Personalised recommendations