Abstract
The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force [1] and the British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group [2] recommend permanent pacing as treatment for neurally mediated syncope. What is the evidence that supports these recommendations? Unquestionably, fainting is a substantial problem for many of our patients and merits attempts at treatment. Although many believe that fainting is a transitory phase that passes, and that the severity of symptoms is minimal, this is far from the rule. Several studies reported that patients had medians of 5–15 syncopal spells, and had been fainting for of 2–10 years [3–9]. Many patients faint several times a year. Therefore vasovagal syncope can occur frequently, and it can be a problem that lasts many years. Not surprisingly, patients with frequent vasovagal syncope have a poor quality of life. Patients with recurrent syncope are impaired to a similar extent as those with severe rheumatoid arthritis or chronic low back pain, and as psychiatric inpatients [10]. The quality of life decreases as the frequency of syncopal spells increases [11]. Although some patients do respond to drug therapy, many do not, and for them treatment with a permanent pacemaker is often considered.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Derives LS, Fisch C, Griffin JC et al (1991) Guidelines for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures (Committee on Pacemaker Implantation). J Am Coll Cardiol 18:1–13
Clarke M, Sutton R, Ward D et al (1991) Recommendations for pacemaker prescriptions for symptomatic bradycardia. British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group Working Party Report. Br Heart J 66:185–191
Sheldon R, Rose S, Flanagan P et al (1996) Risk factors for syncope recurrence after a positive tilt table test in patients with syncope. Circulation 93:973–981.
Natale A, Geiger MJ, Maglio C et al (1996) Recurrence of neurocardiogenic syncope without pharmacologic interventions. Am J Cardiol 77:1001–1003
Petersen MEV, Chamberlain-Webber R, Fitzpatrick AP et al (1994) Permanent pacing for cardioinhibitory malignant vasovagal syndrome. Br Heart J 71:274–281
Benditt DG, Sutton R, Gammage M and the Rate-drop Response Investigators (1997) Clinical experience with Thera DR rate drop response pacing algorithm in carotid sinus syndrome and vasovagal syncope. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 20:832–839
Sheldon RS, Koshman ML, Wilson W et al (1997) Effect of dual-chamber pacing with automatic rate-drop sensing on recurrent neurally mediated syncope. Am J Cardiol 81:158–162
Connolly SJ, Sheldon RS, Roberts RS, Gent M (1999) The North American Vasovagal Pacemaker Study. A randomized trial of permanent cardiac for the prevention of vasovagal syncope. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:16–20
Sutton R, Brignole M, Menozzi C et al (2000) Dual chamber pacing in the treatment of neurally mediated tilt-positive cardioinhibitory syncope. Pacemaker versus no therapy: a multicentre randomized study. Circulation 102:294–299
Linzer M, Pontinen M, Gold DT et al (1991) Impairment of physical and psychosocial function in recurrent syncope. J Clin Epidemiol 44:1037–1043
Rose MS, Koshman ML, Spreng S, Sheldon RS (2000) The relationship between health related quality of life and frequency of spells in patients with syncope. J Clin Epidemiol 53:1209–1216
Sheldon RS (2000) Pacing to prevent vasovagal syncope. Cardiol Clin 18: 81–93
Sorijja P, Elliot PM, McKenna WJ (2000) Pacing in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Cardiol Clin 18:67–79
Gillis AM, Wyse DG, Connolly SJ et al (1999) Atrial pacing periablation for prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circulation 99:2553–2558
Gillis AM, Connolly SJ, Lacombe P et al (2000) Randomized crossover comparison of DDDR versus VDD pacing after atrioventricular junction for prevention of atrial fibrillation (PA3) study investigators. Circulation 102:736–741
Connolly SJ, Kerr CR, Gent M et al (2000) Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes. Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing Investigators. N Engl J Med 342:1385–1391
Garred J, Wilson W, Koshman ML et al (1998) Heart periods during clinical syncope: Holter analysis of patients with neurally mediated syncope. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 21:793
Menozzi C, Brignole M, Lolli G et al (1993) Follow-up of asystolic episodes in patients with cardioinhibitory, neurally mediated syncope and VVI pacemaker. Am J Cardiol 72:1152–1155
Redelmeier DA, Tu JV, Schull MJ et al (2001) Problems for clinical judgement: 2. Obtaining a reliable past medical history. Can Med Assoc J 164:809–813
McLeod KA, Wilson N, Hewitt J et al (1999) Cardiac pacing for severe childhood neurally mediated syncope with reflex anoxic seizures. Heart 82:721–725
Ammirati F, Colivicchi F, Toscano S et al (1998) DDI pacing with rate drop response function versus DDI with rate hysteresis pacing for cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 21:2178–2181
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Italia
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sheldon, R.S. (2002). Pacing for Vasovagal Syncope: Real Efficacy or Placebo Effect?. In: Raviele, A. (eds) Cardiac Arrhythmias 2001. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2103-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2103-7_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2165-5
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2103-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive