Skip to main content
  • 216 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter I shall be discussing those aspects of practice that are changing. For many of us these are uncontrollable trends of an epidemiological nature, evolution in society, rather than revolution in clinical practice. Changes in society are likely to make a greater impact on practice than the introduction of new drugs or equipment. To illustrate these points I have drawn on international, national and local data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Capogna G (2000) Obstetric anaesthesia practices in Italy. In: Reynolds F (ed) Regional analgesia in obstetrics. Springer, London, pp 39–41

    Google Scholar 

  2. Report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom 1994-1996 (1998) Why mothers die. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Waterstone M, Bewley S, Wolfe C (2001) Incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity: case control study. Br Med J 322: 1089–1093

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Robinson A P C, Lyons G (1999) Morbidity and mortality from obstetric anaesthesia in the 1990s. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 12: 277–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hawkins J L, Gibbs C P, Orleans M et al (1997) Obstetric anesthesia workforce survey. 1981 versus 1992. Anesthesiology 87: 135–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stephens I D (1991) ICU admissions from an obstetric hospital. Can J Anaesth 38: 677–681

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Madej T H, Jackson I J B, Wheatley R G et al (1993) Assessing introduction of spinal anaesthesia for obstetric procedures Quality in Health Care 2: 31–34

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson R V, Lyons G, Wilson R C et al (2000) Training in obstetric general anaesthesia is a vanishing art. Anaesthesia 55: 179–183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsen L C, Pilsner R, Camaan WR (1998) General anesthesia at a tertiary care hospital 1990-1995: indications and implications Int J Obs Anesth 7: 147–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Leitch C R, Walker JJ (1994) Caesarean section rates Br Med J 308: 133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Collis R E, Sewell J M A, Mapleson W W (2000) Analysis of maternal age and social class on risk of obstetric intervention and obstetric anaesthetic requirements Br J Anaesth 86: 31 IP

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gorton H, Wilson R C, Robinson A P C et al (2000) Survivors of childhood cancers: implications for anaesthetists Br J Anaesth 85: 911–913

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Birnbach D J, Van Zundert A (1997) Drug abuse in the pregnant woman. In: Russell I F, Lyons G (eds) Clinical problems in obstetric anaesthesia. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 221–228

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hamza J, Ducot B, Dupont X et al (1995) Anaesthesia consultation can decrease the need for general anaesthesia for emergency caesarean section in parturients with difficult airway. Br J Anaesth 74: A353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schneider M C, Schmid M (2000) Post durai puncture headache. In: Birnbach D J, Gatt S P, Datta S (eds) Textbook of obstetric anesthesia. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 487–503

    Google Scholar 

  16. Van der Vyver M J, Halpern S J, Joseph G (2001) Patient controlled epidural analgesia vs continuous infusion for labor pain: a meta-analysis. Anesthesiology 94: 1 A71

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lyons, G. (2002). Trends in Obstetric Anaesthesia. In: Gullo, A. (eds) Anaesthesia, Pain, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine — A.P.I.C.E.. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2099-3_90

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2099-3_90

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0176-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2099-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics