Advertisement

How to Balance General Anesthesia

  • G. Torri
Conference paper

Abstract

In 1950 Rees and Gray [1] suggested a definition of general anesthesia that included narcosis, analgesia, and relaxation. Time has proved that the term analgesia is unsatisfactory. Analgesia means freedom from pain. In order for pain exist, a conscious patient must elaborate impulse from the periphery as pain. If the patient is unconscious, then he cannot be aware of pain, that is to say analgesia is present. Of course during surgery there are important reactions to reflex stimuli that during consciousness would be painful. Moving from these concepts, the same authors [1] proposed the most widely accepted triad of anesthesia, which includes narcosis, relaxation and reflex depression.

Keywords

Nitrous Oxide Minimal Alveolar Concentration Inhalation Agent Sympathetic Response Surgical Stimulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rees GJ, Gray TC (1950) Methyl-n-propyl-ether. Br J Anaesth 22: 83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pinsker MC (1986) Anesthesia: a pragmatic construct. Anesth Analg 65: 819PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Torri G, Casati A et al (2000) Cardiovascular homeostasis during inhalational general anesthesia: a clinical comparison between sevoflurane and isoflurane. J Clin Anaesth 12: 117–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eger El II, Johnson BH (1987) Rates of awakening from anesthesia with 1-653, halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane: a test of the effect of anesthetic concentration and duration in rats. Anesth Analg 66: 977–982PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Katoh T, Ikeda K (1998) The effects of fentanyl on sevoflurane requirements for loss of consciousness and skin incision. Anesthesiology 88: 18–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stoelting RK, Longnecker DE, Eger EI II (1970) Minimum alvolar concentration in man on awakening from methoxyflurane, halothane, ether and fluroxene anesthesia: MAC awake. Anesthesiology 33: 5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Jong RH, Eger EI I (1975). Mac expanded: AD and AD values 50 95 50 95 of common inhalation anesthetics in man. Anesthesiology 42: 384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Katoh T, Kobayashi S et al (1999b) The effect of fentanyl on sevoflurane requirements for somatic and sympathetic responses to surgical incision. Anesthesiology 90: 398–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Daniel M, Weiskopf RB, Moorami M, Eger EI (1975) Fentanyl augments the blockade of the sympathetic response to incision (MAC-bar) produced by desflurane and isoflurane. Anesthesiology 42: 384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shafer SL, Varvel JR, Aziz N, Scott JC (1979) Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl administered by computer-controlled infusion pump. Anesthesiology 77: 1091–1092Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Glass PSA (1998) Anesthetic drug interactions: an insight into general anesthesia. Its mechanism and dosing strategies. Anesthesiology 88: 5–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stoeckel RK, Hengstmann JH, Schuttler J (1979). Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl as a possible explanation for recurrence of respiratory depression. Br J Anaesth 51: 771CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Torri
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive CareUniversity of San RaffaeleMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations