Advertisement

Trauma Scoring Systems

  • F. Della Corte
  • G. L. Vignazia
  • M. Cavaglia
Conference paper

Abstract

During the last 20 years many trauma-scoring indexes have been developed and their applicability seems to be important mainly because they could allow [1]:
  • comparisons of the efficacy of different therapeutic interventions and outcome

  • quick triage during the pre-hospital phases as well as priority treatments.

Keywords

Injury Severity Score Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Abbreviate Injury Scale Thoracic Trauma Pulmonary Contusion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Brenneman FD (1998) Measuring injury severity: time for a change? J Trauma 44: 580–583PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    DeHaven H (1952) The site, frequency and dangerousness of injury sustained by 800 survivors of light plane accidents. Crash injury research, Cornell University Medical College, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dick WF, Baskett PJF (1999) Recommendations for uniform reporting of data following major trauma. The Utstein style. Resuscitation 42: 81–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baker (1974) The Injury Severity Score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 14: 187–196Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Osier T (1997) A modification of the Injury Severity Score that both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring. J Trauma 43: 922–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Balogh Z (2000) NISS predicts postinjury multiple organ failure better then ISS. J Trauma 48: 624–628PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marsh E (2001) The New Injury Severity Score and the evaluation of pediatric trauma. J Trauma 50: 1106–1110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boyd CR (1987) Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. J Trauma 27: 370–377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Corbanese U (1996) Evaluation of trauma care: validation of the TRISS method in an Italian ICU. Intensive Care Med 22: 941–946PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zoltie N (1993) The hit and miss of ISS and TRISS. BMJ 307: 906–909PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    West T (2000) Harborview assessment for risk of mortality: an improved measure of injury severity on the basis of ICD-9-CM. J Trauma 49: 530–541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Osier T (1996) ICISS: an international classification of disease-9 based Injury Severity Score. J Trauma 41: 380–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pape HC (2000) Appraisal of early evaluation of blunt chest trauma: development of a standardized scoring system for initial clinical decision making. J Trauma 49: 496–454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wong DT (1996) A comparison of APACHEII score and TRISS for outcome assessment in intensive care unit trauma patients. Crit Care Med 24: 1642–1647PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hosmer DW Lemeshow S 1989 Applied logistic regression. Wiley New York pp 142–143Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rutledge R (1998) The end of ISS and TRISS: ICISS, an international classification of disease, ninth edition-based prediction tool, outperforms both ISS and TRISS as predictors of trauma patients survival, hospital charges and hospital length of stay. J Trauma 44: 41–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Della Corte
    • 1
  • G. L. Vignazia
    • 1
  • M. Cavaglia
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive CareUniversity “A. Avogadro” of Eastern PiedmontNovaraItaly

Personalised recommendations