Advertisement

Trauma Intensive Care: Early and Late Challenges

  • G. Nardi
  • L. Riccioni
  • E. De Blasio
Conference paper

Abstract

The development of a trauma program, with a clinical service, trauma protocols, and a well-organized trauma team could be expected to improve the process of care and thereby outcomes after injury. An integrated model of trauma care allows better continuity of care, minimizes communication errors, and establishes the overall responsibilities for the whole process through the identification of a trauma team leader. Evidence supports the assertion that a fully implemented trauma system reduces mortality rate for severely injured patients [1]. Continuous quality improvement and performance monitoring are cornerstones in achieving the principal targets of the trauma program: reduction of preventable death after injury.

Keywords

Pelvic Fracture Transcatheter Arterial Embolisation Trauma Team Unstable Pelvic Fracture Emergency Depart Nurse 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Mullins RJ, Veum-Stone J, Helfand M, et al (1994) Outcome of hospitalized injured patients after institution of a trauma system in an urban area. JAMA 271: 1919–1924PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Donabedian A (1988) The role of outcomes in quality assessment and assurance. JAMA 260: 1743–1748PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rastogi S, Wild BR, Duthie RB (1986) Biomechanical aspects of femoral fractures in automobile accidents. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68: 760–766PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adili A, Bhandari M, Lachowski RJ et al (1999) Organ injuries associated with femoral fractures: implication for severity of injury in motor vehicular collisions. J Trauma 46: 386–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Michaels AJ, Madey SM, Krieg JC, Long W (2001) Traditional Injury Severity Scoring underestimates the relative consequences of orthopedic injury. J Trauma 50: 389–396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Riska E, Von Bonsdorf H, Hakkinen S, et al (1976) Fat embolisms in patients with multiple injuries. Injury 8: 110–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scibel R, La Duca J, Hasset JM, et al (1985) Blunt multiple trauma, femur traction and the pulmonary failure septic state. Ann Surg 202: 283–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bone LB, Johnson KD, Weigelt J, et al (1989) Early versus delayed stabilization of femural fractures: a prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71: 336–340PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jaicks RR, Cohn SM, Moller BA (1997) Early fracture fixation may be deleterious after head injury. J Trauma 42: 1–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Scalea TM, Scott J, Brumback RJ, et al (1999) Early fracture fixation may be “just fine” after head injury: no difference in central nervous system outcomes. J Trauma 46: 839–846PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pape HC, Auf’m’Kolk M, Paffrath T, et al (1993) Primary intramedullary femur fixation with associated lung contusion: a case of post-traumatic ARDS? J Trauma 34: 540–548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dunham CM, Bosse JM, Clancy VT, et al (2001) Practice management guidelines for the optimal timing of long-bone fracture stabilization in polytrauma patients: the EAST Practice Management Guidelines Work Group. J Trauma 50: 958–967PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scalea TM, Boswell SA, Scott JD, et al (2000) External fixation as a bridge to intramedullary nailing for patients with multiple injuries and with femur fractures: damage control orthopedics. J Trauma 48: 613–623PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tucker MC, Nork SE, Simonian PT, Chip Routt ML (2000) Simple anterior pelvic external fixation. J Trauma 49: 989–994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wong Y, Wang L, Ng CJ, et al (2000) Mortality after successful transcatheter arterial embolization in patients with unstable pelvic fractures: rate of blood transfusion as predictive factor. J Trauma 49: 71–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Agolini SF, Shah K, Jaffe J, et al (1997) Arterial embolization is a rapid and effective technique for controlling pelvic fracture hemorrhage. J Trauma 43: 395–399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grimm MR, Vrahas MS, Thomas KA (1998) Pressure-volume characteristics of the intact and disrupted pelvic retroperitoneum. J Trauma 44: 454–459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Nardi
    • 1
  • L. Riccioni
    • 1
  • E. De Blasio
    • 1
  1. 1.Intensive Care Unit “Marchiafava”, Emergency DepartmentS. Camillo-Forlanini HospitalRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations