Advertisement

Intestinal Parasitoses: A History of Scientific Progress and Endemic Disease in Society

  • Esther Diana

Abstract

In the course of history, gastro-intestinal infections have been closely linked to the sanitary conditions of various populations and above all to those of the poorer social classes.

Keywords

Nineteenth Century Eighteenth Century Scientific Progress Fifteenth Century Endemic Disease 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    On the incidence of dysentery among soldiers and for bibliographic references, Keel O, Hudon P (1977) L’essor de la pratique clinique dans les armèes européenns (1750-1800). Gesnerus 54:37–58. Also Alessandrini G (1915) Le malattie da parassiti animali negli eserciti combattenti. Il Policlinico. Sezione Pratica 22, 822. For the religious communities, Les Bras H, Dinet D (1980) Mortalité des laics et mortalité des religieux: les benedectins de Saint-Maur aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècle. Population 2:360-377Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    The Egyptians were the first to offer theories on spontaneous generation; they believed that the worms were generated by the divine will of the illnesses themselves. The essentially religious inspiration for contamination continues in Hebrew medicine where parasitoses are seen as a punishment for the sinner. The study of parasites was to assume the characteristics of a science without theological requirements in Greece. For a historical picture: Ercolani GB (1859) Dei parassiti e dei morbi parassitari. Giacomo Monti Tipografo Editore, Bologna; Penso G (1990) Parassiti, microbi e contagi. Ciba Geigy Ed., MilanGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Avicenna Ibn Sina (1593) Libri V canonis medicinae, Typ. Medicea, Romae, cited in Penso G (1990) Parassiti, microbi..., p 114Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    The descriptions by Johann Schenck von Grafenberg (1530-1598) provide examples of some of the partly scientific and partly imaginative interpretations of the time, with illustrations of pin worms that had infected a chicken’s eggs shown like the “serpents” in the head of a Medusa: (1600) Observationum medicarum rararum. Sumpt. J. Rhodii, Francofurti. Parasitic cases reported by the famous French surgeon Ambroise Paré, illustrated with extremely imaginative pictures: (1607) Les Oeuvres se M. Ambroise Paré, conseiller et premier Chirurgien du Roy. Nicholas Buon, Paris. The description that Michael Berhard Valentini (1657-1729—one of the founder doctors of comparative anatomy and a fine scientist) made of a worm with a “...caput et Collum pectusque equinum fere habet... caput vero crista ornatum...cum pedes non dexter e sinister, sed anterior et posterior medio in corpore...”: Valentini M.B. (1711) Praxis medicinalis infallibilis, Apud Dominicum Saude, Francofurti ad Moenum. And then, also the “mostrosos vermes” discharged by a little boy described by Spigel: Spigel A (1618) De lumbrici lato liber cum ejusdem lumbrici icone. Typis L. Pasquati, Patavii. The live worm, the length of the palm of the hand, black and hairy, found in a heart by Giorgio Baglivi: (1696) De praxi medica libri duo ad priscam observandi rationem revocanda. Typis Dom. Antonii Herculis, Romae. On the same subject, Camporesi P (1994) La carne impassibile: salvezza e salute fra medioevo e controriforme. Garzanti. MilanoGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Benivieni A (1507) De abditis nonnulis ac mirandis morborum et sanationum causis. P. Giunta, Florentiae, p 658Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Benivieni A (1507) De abditis nonnulis ac mirandis morborum et sanationum causis. P. Giunta, Florentiae, p 531Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Benivieni A (1507) De abditis nonnulis ac mirandis morborum et sanationum causis. P. Giunta, Florentiae, p 658Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guidetti G (1783) Dei vermi umani in generale e delle diverse specie di tenie in particolare. Gaetano Cambiagi, Florence, p 18Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    The helminth subdivision of Hippocrates was to last for 23 centuries or up until the systematics of Carl Asmund Rudolphi who, in 1808, introduced the Oxyuris species, attributing it to what had up until then been indicated as the Ascaris. The pinworms were described as having a “corpus teres, elasticum, parte postica tenuissima” compared to the roundworms with a “corpus teres, elasticum (cum) utrinque attenuatum”. The change in the name was made official by Johann Gottfried Bremser (1767-1827) in 1819Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Littré E (1839-1861) Hippocrates—Oeuvres complètes. Traduction nouvelle avec le texte grec en regard, vol. 10. Ed. J.B. Baillere, Paris, Livre EpidemieGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Littré E (1839-1861) Hippocrates...cit. Traité des maladiesGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Adams F. (1856) Aretaeus Cappadocius: The extant works of Aretaeus the Cappadocian. Sydenham Society, Paris, cited by Penso G, (1990) in Parassiti, microbi..., p 74. Tenesmus indicates the painful spasm of the anal sphincter causing the continuous desire to defecateGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Del Lungo I (1904) Celsus Aulus Aurelius Cornelius: De Medicina. Sansoni GC, FlorenceGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yuhanna Ibn Serafiyoun (1550) Practica. Apud Juntas, VenetiisGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Avicenna Ibn Sina (1593) Libri V...cit.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Knowledge in this area was, however, more fragmentary and the transcriptions from Greek documents were often imperfect: as in the case of the Greek word ascaris which was used for the pinworms and which the Salerno authors understood to be proglottids of the tapeworm, following the declarations of Maestro Petroncello (late fifth century), who when he described the three types of worm (longi, lati et rotundi), indicated the latter as being similar to marrow seeds “quos Graeci ascarides vocant”. De Renzi S (1856) Petrocellus Salernitanus: Practica in “Collectio salernitana ossia documenti inediti e trattati di medicina appartenenti alla scuola medica salernitana”. Tipografia del Filiatre Sebezia, Naples, Tomo IVGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Savonarola GM (1498) Tractatus sublimis de vermibus nusquam antehac impressus. Bonetum Locatellum Bergamenses, Venetiis. The work, divided into five chapters, represents the first treatise in this sector that was not linked to another medical reportGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Duno T (1592) Epistolae medicinales—Locis multis auctae: in quibus de oximelitis facultatibus et curatione pleuritidis, morborumque articularum tractatus. Eiusdem: de hemitritaeo, sive de febre semitertiana libellus. Item: miscellaneorum de re medice liber omnino utilis, alies non editus. JP Vulpius, TiguriGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Platter F (1602-1603) Praxeos seu de cognoscendis praedicendis, praecavendis, curandisque affectibus homini incommodantibus. Typ. C. Waldekirchius, Basileae, cited by Penso G (1990) Parassiti, microbi...,p 151Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gemma C (1575) De naturae divinis characterismis. Ex Officina Christophori Plantini, Antverpiae. Fragments of tapeworm and pinworms are illustrated for the first timeGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Houllier J (1623) Omnia Opera Pratica. J. Stoer, ParisiisGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Varro Marcus Terentius (1912) Rerum Rusticarum, In Aedibus B.G. Teubneri, LipsiaeGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fracastoro G (1546) De contagione et contagiosis morbis et curatione. Apud heredes L. Iuntae, Venetiis. Alongside the studies based on case histories, the efforts to explain spontaneous generation continued throughout the sixteenth century. Filippo Teofrasto Bombasto da Hoenheim (Paracelso, 1493-1541) believed that the worms were generated by sperm and by putrefaction. In women they were generated, therefore, by putrefaction of the sperm. This putrefaction could then become a supportive element for a medicine that “provoked heat” or for those organs lacking in an acid tissue. Jacopo Brilli carried out some extremely important work. He wrote the first monograph on parasitology, printed in the sixteenth century, where he attributes the genesis of the helminths to phlegm, bile and blood that seemingly provoke situations favouring putrefaction in the intestines. Taking over the earlier affirmations of Savonarola, Brilli attributed particular diagnostic predictions to the worms discharged during illness, according to their vitality after expulsion and their appearance at the beginning, middle or end of the illness. Brilli I (1540) Opusculum de vermibus in corpore humano genitis. In Officina Erasmana, VenetiisGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    De Urso NA (1601) De vermibus tractatus. Apud Io. Iacubum Carlinum, Typographum Curia Archiep, NeapolisGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Buonamici F (1603) De alimento. Apud Bartholomeum Sermatillium Juniorerm, FlorentiaeGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Spiegel A (1618) De lumbrici lato liber cum ejusdem lumbrici icone. Typis L. Pasquati, PataviiGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Redi F (1684) Osservazioni intorno agli animali viventi che si trovano negli animali viventi. Per Piero Matini, Florence. A year before the publication of Redi’s book, Edward Tyson had also discovered the male and female genders in round worms and eggs in the female worm: Tyson E (1693) Lumbricus teres or some anatomical observations on the round worm bred in human bodies. Philosophical Transactions, London. See also, Contoli GB (1701) Osservazioni sopra gli ascaridi. Stamperia di Giuseppe Monaldi in Parione, RomeGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    On Redi’s experiments, see Penso G (1990) Parassiti, microbi..., pp 248–252. More in general, Altieri Biagi ML (1968) Lingua e cultura di Francesco Redi. Olscky Ed., FlorenceGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Malpighi M (i687) Opera Omnia. Apud Robertum Littlebury, LugduniGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Harvey W (1651) Exercitationes de generatione animalium. O. Pulleyn, LondiniGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lipstor GD (1687) Disputatio de animalculis in humano corpore genitis. Lugdunium BatavorumGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Andry asserted that the worms penetrated into the intestines through the ingestion of a “seed” or an “egg” which only developed into a worm if it found itself in a suitable environment: Andry N (1701) De la generation des vers dans le corps de l’homme. Chez Thomas Lombrail, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Boerhave H (1708) Istitutionis medicae in usus annuae exercitationis domesticas. Apud Joannem Vander Linden, Lugdunium BatavorumGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vallisneri A (1710) Considerazioni ed esperienze intorno alia generazione de’ vermi ordinari del corpo umano fatte da Antonio Vallisneri e da lui scritte. Stamperia del Seminario, Padua; (1733) Opere fisicomediche stampate o manoscritte del Cavalier Antonio Vallisneri raccolte da Antonio suo figliuolo. Appresso Sebastiano Coleti, Venice; (1713) Nuove osservazioni ed esperienze intorno all’ovaia scoperta nei vermi tondi dell’uomo, e de vitelli, con varie lettere spettanti alla storia medica e naturale. Stamperia del seminario, PaduaGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Severini MA (1632) De recondita abscessum natura. Typis Vincentii Manfredii, NeapolisGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kircher carried out his experiments on people who had died from the plague in 1656 in Rome: apart from whether he effectively discovered or not the Pasteurella pestis, the cleric recognised “...vermiculi...tam tenues et subtilesut omnem sensus captum eludant nec non nisi exquisitissimo smicroscopio sub sensum cadant atomos deceres...”. Aetiologically, he explained how the worms from the dead bodies of those infected by the illness passed into the air or were spread by the flies which land on the humours of those suffering from the plague and then contaminated the food, transmitting the illness to those who ate that food: Kircher A (1658) Scrutinium physicomedicum contagiosae luis, quae pestis dicitur. Typis Mascardi, RomaeGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Leeuwenhoek von A (1680) Lettera del 12 novembre 1680 a R. Hooke, cited by Penso G (1990) in Parassiti, microbi..., p 267Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Leeuwenhoek von A (1695) Arcana natura detecta. Kroneveld, Delphis BatavorumGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Linné K (1758) Systema naturae per regna tria naturae secundum classes, ordines, genera, species cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio X, Impensis direct Laurentii Salvii, Holmiae. Linné was of fundamental importance if we consider that Andry’s classification was published in the early eighteenth century and still included parasitic worms in the species of the Insects, divided in its turn into Grands Insectes (e.g. the grass snake, the frog, the viper, the scorpion etc.) and Verms. These latter also placed “worms that generate themselves in the bodies of men” alongside flies, caterpillars, butterflies etc.”Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    For the first time the human round worm is called ascaris, the name that had until then indicated pin-worms, which Linne calls ascaris vermicularis. The family of the Taenia (tapeworm) instead, included the Taenia solium (the saginata of today); the Taenia vulgaris (the Diphyllobotrium latum); the Taenia lata (identical to the previous type); the Taenia canina (of more uncertain identification, but presumably belonging to the parasites of the dog)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Baker H (1753) Employment for the microscope. R. Dodsley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wrisberg HA (1765) Observationum de animalculis infusoriis satura. Apud Viduam B. Vandenhoeck, GoettingaeGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kuchenmeister GFH (1855) Experimenteller nachweis das Cysticercus cellulosae innerhalb des menschlichen Darmkanales sich in Taenia solium umwandelt. Wiener medizinesche Wochenshrift, cited by Penso G (1990) Parassiti, microbi..., p 383Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Penso G (1990) Parassiti, microbi..., p 384Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    De Filippi F (1837) Descrizione di nuovi entozoi trovati in alcuni molluschi d’acqua dolce, Giornale di letteratura, scienze ed arti compilato da vari letterati delle scienze di Torino, Turin, LXXXVIIGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Dubini A (1843) Nuovo verme intestinale umano costituente un sesto genere di nematoidei propri dell’uomo. Annali Universali di medicina CVI: 5Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    The relationship between the anchylostomiasis demonstrated by Edoardo Perroncito and the pernicious oligaemia suffered by the miners in the tunnel of St. Gothard in 1880 is well known. Perroncito E (1880) Osservazioni elmintologiche relative alia malattia sviluppatasi endemica fra gli operai del Gottardo. Atti della Reale Accademia dei Lincei, VII, series III: 381; Perroncito E (1910) La malattia de minatori del S. Gottardo al Sempione. Una questione risolta. Carlo Pasta Libraio Editore, TurinGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    The doctor was Jacobus Bontius (1592-1631) who worked in Batavia: he recognised an acute epidemic and feverish dysentery (bacterial dysentery) and another chronic illness that produced intestinal ulcers, frequent mucous and sanguinolent defecation (amoebic dysentery); from Penso G (1990) Parassiti, microbi..., p 243Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Keel O, Hudon P (1977) L’essor de la pratique clinique dans les armèes européenns..., p 50Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    ”Social medicine” originated from the study results of the Public Health Commissions that were established in many European cities to investigate the sanitary situation of urban settlements. The work of these groups would have been able to effectively oppose the epidemic diseases (typhus, cholera) of the nineteenth century. For as the work carried out by the Conseil de Salubrité established in 1802 in Paris on the cholera epidemic, see Aisemberg AR (1999) Contagion. Disease, government and the “social question” in nineteenth century France. Stanford Univerity Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Eheremberg DCG (1838) Die infusionsthierchen aus volkommen Organismen. Ein Blick in das Tiefere organische Leben der natur. Nebst einem Atlas von vierundsechzig colorirten kupfertafeln gezeichnet vom Verfasser. Verlag von Leopold Voss, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lewis TR (1869) A report on the microscopic objects found in cholera evacuations. Appendix to annual report of the Sanitary Commissioner of the Government of India. Calcutta, VIII:241Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Losch F (1875) Massenhafte entwickelung von Amöben in Dickdarm. Archiv fur patologische anatomie LXV:i96Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lambl V (1859) Mikrosckopische Untersuchungen der Darmexkrete. Beitrag zur pathologie des darms und zur diagnostik am krankenbette. Vierteljahrschrift fur praktische heilkunde LXI:iGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Grassi G (1878) L’anguillula intestinalis. Gazzetta medica italiana della Lombardia XXXVIII:471Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Casagrandi O, Barbagallo Rapisardi P (1895) Ricerche biologiche e cliniche sull’Amoeba coli. Bullettino dell’Accademia Gioenia di scienze naturali di Catania. XXXIX, 46, XLI7Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Penso G (1990) Parassiti, microbi..., p 440. Also see Bosc L (1833) Storia naturale dei vermi contenente la loro descrizione e abitudini con disegni tratti dal naturale. Trad, dal francese di Farini DA Batelli, FirenzeGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Coltro D (1983) Dalla magia alia medicina contadina. Sansoni, Firenze, p 58Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Del Lungo I (1904), Celsus Aulus Aurelius Cornelius: De Medicina...Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Cardini F (1981) Tra scienza e magia. In: AA.VV. Una farmacia preindustriale in Valdelsa. S. Gimignano, pp 153–161; Diana E (1995) L’olio tra superstizione e medicina. Centro di studi chiantigiani Clante, Poggibonsi, pp 61-65Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Penso G (1990) Parassiti, microbi …,p 244Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Salando F (1607) Trattato sopra li vermi, cause, differenze, pronostico e curatione. Stamperia di Angelo Tamo, Verona, cited by Penso G (1990) Parassiti, microbi…, p 196Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Penso G (1990) Parassiti, microbi…, p 247Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Baricelli GC (1620) Hortulus genialis. M. Smith, Coloniae, cited by Penso G (1990) Parassiti, microbi…, p 240Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Guidetti G (1783) Dei vermi umani in generale…, p 27Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Tanret C (1878) Sur la pelletiérine alcaloide de l’écorce de granadier. Journal de Thèrapeutique, V:815Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Here I will only mention the texts among the many on the Books of the Dead and the registers of the mortality in general within Europe that have been useful for writing this study. Smith R.S. (1936) Barcelona Bills of Mortality and population. 1457–1590. Journal of Political Economy, XLIV: 84-93; Rodrigues T (1990) Crises de mortalidade ein Liboa-sec. XVI-XVII. Lisbon; Brett-James NG (1933) The London Bills of Mortality in the XVIII century. The London and Liddlesex Archeological Society, VI; Forbes TR (1971) Mortality books for 1774-1835 from the Parish of St. Giles, Cripplegate, London. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 47, n. 21:1524-36; Forbes TR (1981) Births and deaths in a London parish: the record from the registers, 1654-1693 and 1729-1743. Bulletin of the history of medicine, LV, n. 3:371-91; Galloway PR (1985) Annual variations in deaths by age, deaths by cause, prices, and weather in London 1670 to 1830. Population Studies, XXXIX, n. 3:487-500; Landers J (1993) Deaths and metropolis. Studies in the demographic history of London 1670-1830. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; Preston S, Val de Walles W (1978) Urban French mortality in the XIX siecle. Population Studies, 2:511-534; Faure 0 (1993) Le Francais et leur medecine au XIXe siècle. Berlin, Paris; Faure 0 (1994) Histoire sociale de la médicine en France (XVIII-XXe siècles) Anthropos, Paris; Aisemberg AR (1999) Contagion. Disease, government and the social question in nineteenth-century France. Stanford University Press, Stanford; Perrenoud A (1999) La population de Genève—XVF-XIXe siècles. Societe d Histoire et d’archeologie de Genève, Genève; Imhof AE, Lindskov BJ (1974) Les causes de mortalite en Suède et in Finlande entre 1749-1773. Annales ESC, IV:915-33; Beltrami D (1954) Storia della popolazione di Venezia dalla fine del sec. XVI alia caduta della Repubblica. Cedam, Padova; D’Arco C (1939) Studi statistici sulla popolazione di Mantova. Coi tipi all’Apollodi Ferdinando Elmucci, Mantova; Zanetti DE (1976) La morte a Milano nei secoli XVI-XVIII. Rivista Storica Italiana, 1976:803-851; Hearly D, Klapish-Zuber C (1985) The Tuscans and their families. Yale University Press, New Haven and London, pp 599-632; Diana E (2002) Professions and intestinal infections in 15th century Florence. Canadian Bulletin of Medical History, 19(2) p 1-21Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    The series of deaths is broken from 1637 to 1646 but thereafter, runs without interruption to the middle of the nineteenth century. There are about 150 types of disease reported in the Bills of Mortality; Galloway PR (1985) Annual variations in deaths…p 491Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    The practice of registering the deaths as sources of statistical information dates from, however, the seventeenth century. The most famous work is that by John Graunt who, from the data supplied in the Bills of London, formulated in 1661 the first demographic laws comparing the number of births and deaths, divided by sex at birth and death, the percentage of the known cause of death with the total number of dead. Apart from the documents mentioned above, for England, see Marshall J (1832) Mortality of metropolis, a statistical view of the number of persons reported to have died of each of more than 100 kinds of diseases and casualties within the Bills of Mortality, in each of the two hundred and four years, 1629-1831. Treuttel, Wurtz and Richter, London; Zanetti DE (1976) La morte a Milano…, pp 807–809Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    For example, the only indications we have on the most rampant illnesses among the population in Florence in the fifteenth century cover the 3 years of the plague mentioned above; not even the contemporary Books of the Sick or of the Dead compiled by the nursing staff in the various hospitals in the city (in charge of admitting the patients or registering their deaths) include notes of this type. Normal deaths were not recorded in the Barcelona Bills of Mortality in this period eitherGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Here we refer to the deaths that took place in the interior of lay (companies, congregations etc.) or religious (convents, monasteries) institutions that usually had their own cemeteries where the burials that were not declared to the city authorities could take place. We should also remember that the data expressed for individual situations in the city did not necessarily reflect the effective incidence of the mortality therein: passing strangers who unexpectedly died as well as people who normally resided in the surrounding countryside could also be buried hereGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Zanetti DE (1976) La morte a Milano…, pp 817–820Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Faccini L (1978) Sviluppo urbano e condizioni sanitarie dei ceti subalterni. La malattie gastroenteriche in Italia fra il 1887 e il 1914. Classe X, n. 15:165–192Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Forbes TR (1981) Births and deaths…, p 379Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Data taken from the Historic Archives of the City Council of Florence, Libri degli Infermi, from f. 99 to f. 109; Registro dell’infermi, from f. 110 to f. 122Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    State Archives of Florence (A.S.F.), Ufficiali della Grascia, f. 188, Diana E. (2002) Professions and intestinal infections…Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Forbes TR (1981) Births and deaths…,p 380Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    A.S.F., Ufficiali della Grascia, f. 188, reports of year 1424; cited also in Gavitt F (1990) Charity and children in Renaissance Florence. The Ospedale degli Innocenti 1410-1536. University Michigan Press., p 221Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Cited from Betri ML (1981) Le malattie dei poveri. Ambiente urbano, morbilità, strutture sanitarie a Cremona nella prima metà dell’8oo. Franco Angeli Ed. Milano, p 84; Zanetti DE (1976) La morte a Milano…, p 830, note 100; Cherry S (1980) The hospitals and population growth. The voluntary general hospitals, mortality and local populations in the English provinces in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Population Studies, XXXI:59-75, p 70Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    ”Infancy deaths as defined by Marshall (1832) include some deaths from diarrhoea” in Galloway PR (1985) Annual variations in deaths by age …, p 490Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Creighton C (1894) A history of epidemics in Britain from the Extinction of plague to the present time, vol.Google Scholar
  82. 2.
    Cambridge University Press, p 748, cited by Galloway PR (1985) Annual variations in deaths by age …,p 492, note 24Google Scholar
  83. 82.
    A larger numbers of casualties could have been attributed to this cause in the seventeenth century: griping of the gut was the fifth cause of death after consumption, fever, “infancy” and typhus. Presumably “infancy” meant the illnesses linked to weaning and teething in children: Landers J (1993) Deaths and metropolis …, pp 94-95 and p 208Google Scholar
  84. 83.
    Perrenoud A (1999) La population de Genève…, pp 278–279Google Scholar
  85. 84.
    Livi Bacci M (1987) Popolazione ed alimentazione. Saggio sulla storia demografica europea. Il Mulino, Bologna, p 55. For the influence of nutritional status on infections disease, also see Landers J (1993) Deaths and metropolis …, p 30Google Scholar
  86. 85.
    Betri ML (1981) Le malattie dei poveri…, p 41Google Scholar
  87. 86.
    This is how the death of Nanna, a young girl in the hospital is recorded: “…She was full of worms: so many that they killed her. May God bless her…” cited in Gavitt F (1990) Charity and children in Renaissance Florence…, p 221Google Scholar
  88. 87.
    Landers J (1993) Deaths and metropolis …, p 94Google Scholar
  89. 88.
    Forbes TR (1971) Mortality books for 1774-1835 from the Parish of St. Giles…, p 378Google Scholar
  90. 89.
    Cherry S (1980) The hospitals and population growth …,p67Google Scholar
  91. 90.
    Bourgeois-Pichat J (1951) Evolution de la population francaise depius le XVIII siècle. Population 4:635–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 91.
    Zanetti DE (1976) La morte a Milano…, p 850Google Scholar
  93. 92.
    Betri ML (1981) Le malattie dei poveri…., pp 79, 81, 83Google Scholar
  94. 93.
    Diana E (2002) Professions and intestinal infections …cit……. On the close connections between parasitic illnesses and climate, see, among others, also Trexler BJ (1974) Hospital patients in Florence: San Paolo, 1567-1568. Bulletin of History of medicine, CLVIII:41-59; Forbes TR (1981) Births and deaths…., PP 383-384; Diana E (2001) Professione e malattia: considerazioni dai Libri degli Infermi dell’Ospedale di San Giovanni di Dio di Firenze (1626-1650). Popolazione e Storia 1:35-46Google Scholar
  95. 94.
    Imhof AE, Lindskov BJ (1974) Les causes de mortalité …,pp 931–934Google Scholar
  96. 95.
    Perrenoud A (1999) La population de Genève …, P 479Google Scholar
  97. 96.
    Adams T (1975) Moeurs at hygiène publique an XVIII siécle. Queques aspects des dépots de mendicité. Annales de Dèmographie Historique, 98Google Scholar
  98. 97.
    Between 1670 and 1830 the deaths in London from diarrhoea totalled 5,636 out of 21,853, about 25.7%, Galloway PR (1985) Annual variations in deaths by age…, p 490Google Scholar
  99. 98.
    Cherry S (1980) The hospitals and population growth …,p69Google Scholar
  100. 99.
    An important stimulus for the slum clearance in the city, especially in the most impoverished areas, with the recovery of the drainage system and the aqueducts, was the violent cholera epidemic that broke out in 1829 in Europe after the Russian campaign. The lack of knowledge about the pathogenic agent and the mechanisms of transmission combined with the lack of preparation of the sanitary authorities led to the instantaneous spread of the epidemic throughout EuropeGoogle Scholar
  101. 100.
    Pajalich R (1967) Confronto della mortality per cause nella Toscana ed in Italia dal 1887 al 1962. Centro Studi di Sociologia Sanitaria Ed., Rome, p 13Google Scholar
  102. 101.
    Ministry of Agricolture, Industry and Trade (1887) Statistica delle cause di morteGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Esther Diana

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations