Functional approximation and estimation for latent variable systems

  • E. Capobianco
Conference paper


Many models have been suggested in statistics and in econometrics for describing the behavior of latent random financial variables suspected to be behind volatility. Despite all the research done, this area of study remains an excellent ground for experiments on the design and analysis of stochastic systems aimed at modellingnon-linear and non-stationary processes. While it is a common strategy to rely on assumptions about the probability distributions and functions involved in representing volatility dynamics, we contribute to a shift of the emphasis toward a more generally model-free perspective, also seen as non-parametric in statistical inference terms. In pursuing this direction, we attempt to address the use of methodologies so far not exploited very much in this context. Thus, our focus is on functional approximation and semi-parametric estimation, by means of methods such as adaptive wavelet basis representations and related computational sytems. In our applications, the function dictionaries described and the algorithms implemented help in identifying and estimating the behavior of the Nikkei financial stock index, thus improving the feature detection power. From the methodological standpoint side, signal decomposition techniques such as independent component and multire solution analyses are shown to be effective for adaptive learning when used in a combined fashion.


Independent Component Analysis Wavelet Packet Independent Component Analysis Resolution Level Financial Time Series 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Abry, P., Flandrin, P., Taqqu, M. S., Veitch, D. (2000): Wavelets for the analysis, estimation, and synthesis of scaling data. In: Park, K., Willinger, W. (eds.): Self-similar network traffic and performance evaluation. Wiley, New York, pp. 39–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Amari, S.-I. (1998): ICA for temporally correlated signals. Learning algorithms. In: Proceedings of the first international workshop on indipendent component analysis and blind signal separation. Aussois, France, pp. 13–18Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Andersen, T., Bollerslev, T. (1997): Intraday periodicity and volatility persistence in financial markets. J. Empirical Finance 4, 115–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Andersen, T., Bollerslev, T. (1997): Heterogeneous information arrivals and return volatility dynamics: uncovering the long-run in high frequency returns. J. Finance 52, 975–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Bruce, A. G., Gao, H. Y. (1994): S+WAVELETS users manual. MathSoft Inc., Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Capobianco, E. (1999): Wavelets for high frequency financial time series. In: Berk, K., Pourahmadi, M. (eds.): Models, predictions and computing. Interface Foundation of North America, Fairfax Station, VA, pp. 373–377Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Capobianco, E. (1999): Statistical analysis of financial volatility by wavelet shrinkage. Methodol. Comput. Appl. Probab. 1(4), 423–443MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Cardoso, J.-F. (1989): Source separation using higher order moments. In: International conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 2109–2112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Cardoso, J.-F., Souloumiac, A. (1993): Blind beamforming for non-Gaussian signals. IEEE Proc. Part F Radar signal Process. 140, 362–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Chen, S., Donoho D., Saunders, M. A. (2001): Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit. SIAM Rev. 43, 129–159MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Coifman, R. R., Wickerhauser, M. V. (1992): Entropy-based algorithms for best basis selection. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 38, 713–718MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Comon, P. (1994): Independent component analysis — a new concept? Signal Process. 36, 287–314MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Daubechies. L (1992): Ten lectures on wavelets. SIAM, Philadelphia, PAMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Donoho, D. (2001): Sparse components of images and optimal atomic decompositions. Constr. Approx. 17, 353–382MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Donoho, D., Johnstone, I. M. (1994): Ideal spatial adaptation via wavelet shrinkage. Biometrika 81, 425–455MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Donoho, D., Johnstone, I. M. (1995): Adapting to unknown smoothness via wavelet shrinkage. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 90, 1200–1224MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Donoho, D., Johnstone, I. M. (1998): Minimax estimation via wavelet shrinkage. Annals Statist. 26, 879–921MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Gao, H. Y. (1997): Wavelet shrinkage estimates for heteroscedastic regression models. Technical Repdort. MathSoft Inc., Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Hardle, W, Kerkyacharian, G., Picard, D., Tsybakov, A. (1998): Wavelets, approximation, and statistical applications. (Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol. 129). Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Hyvarinen, A., Oja, E. (1997):A fast fixed-point algorithm for independent component analysis. Neural Comput. 9, 1483–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Hyvarinen, A. (1999): Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis. IEEE Trans. Neural. Networks 10, 626–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Jaggi, S., Karl, W. C., Mallat, S., Willsky, A. S. (1998): High resolution pursuit for feature extraction. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 5, 428–449MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Johnstone, I. M., Silverman, B. W. (1997): Wavelet threshold estimators for data with correlated noise. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Ser. B 59, 319–351MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Krim, H., Pesquet, J.-C. (1995): On the statistics of best bases criteria. In: Antoniadis, A., Oppenheim, G. (eds.), Wavelets and statistics. (Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol. 103). Springer, New York, pp. 193–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Lewicki, M. S., Sejnowski, T. J. (2000): Learning overcomplete representations. Neural Comput. 12, 337–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Mallat, S. (1989): Multiresolution approximations and wavelet orthonormal bases of L 2(R). Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 315, 69–87MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Mallat, S. (1998):A wavelet tour of signal processing. Academic Press, San Diego, CAMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Mallat, S., Zhang, Z. (1993): Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 41, 3397–3415MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Meyer, I. (1993): Wavelets. Algorithms & applications. SIAM, Philadelphia, PAMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Mikosch, T., Stâricâ, C. (2000): Limit theory for the sample autocorrelations and extremes of a GARCH(1,1) process. Ann. Statist. 28, 1427–1451MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    von Sachs, R., MacGibbon, B. (2000): Non-parametric curve estimation by wavelet thresholding with locally stationary errors. Scand. J. Statist. 27, 475–499MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Serroukh, A., Walden, A. T., Percival, D. B. (2000): Statistical properties and uses of the wavelet variance estimator for the scale analysis of time series. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 95, 184–196MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Zibulevsky, M., Pearlmutter, B. A. (2001): Blind source separation by sparse decomposition in a signal dictionary. Neural Comput. 13, 863–882MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Capobianco
    • 1
  1. 1.CWIAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations