Atrial Pacing Algorithms for the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is by far the most common form of sustained cardiac arrhythmia. Primary and secondary prevention of AF is an important clinical goal. The idea of preventing recurrence of AF by different location of the lead(s) and different modes and/or algorithms of pacing has been under evaluation for the last decade. The ability of pacing mode to affect the occurrence of AF was first noted from observational studies [1,2]. During the past several years it was confirmed in four randomized pacing trials . Recent large trials of rhythm control versus rate control in AF - such as the Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation (PIAF) , AF Follow-up Investigation in Rhythm Management (AFFIRM), and Rate Control vs Electrical Cardioversion for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (RACE) trials  - suggest that suppression of AF has no effect on the traditional hard outcomes like stroke and cardiovascular death. Reduced frequency and duration of AF, however, is still an important clinical goal in patients with symptomatic AF. The aim of this paper is to review the accumulated data on the pacing algorithms for secondary prevention of AF.
KeywordsAtrial Fibrillation Atrial Arrhythmia Atrial Pace Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Atrial Fibrillation Episode
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 5.Wyse DG (2002) Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation in Rhythm Management. Annual Scientific Sessions of the American College of CardiologyGoogle Scholar
- 6.Crijns HJ (2002) Rate Control vs Electrical Cardioversion. Annual Scientific Sessions of the American College of CardiologyGoogle Scholar
- 12.Wiberg S, Lonnerholm S, Jensen S et al (2001) Effect of right atrial overdrive pacing on symptomatic attacks of atrial fibrillation: a multicenter randomized study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 24:A554Google Scholar
- 15.Camm AJ (2002) AFtherapy study: preventive pacing for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 24:Al25Google Scholar
- 16.Carlson MD, Gold MR, Messenger JC et al (2001) Dynamic atrial overdrive pacing decreases symptomatic atrial arrhythmia burden in patients with sinus node dysfunction. Circulation 104:383Google Scholar
- 17.Beinhauer A, Vock P, Nobis H et al (2002) Significant reduction of AF burden by the AF supression algorithm DAOTM. Europace 3[Suppl A]:A194Google Scholar
- 19.Seidl K, Cazeau S, Gaita F et al (2002) Dual-site pacing vs mono-site pacing in prevention of atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 25(4 pt 1):568 (Abstract)Google Scholar
- 20.Attuel P, El Allaf D, Konz I et al (2001) Is overdrive pacing useful for the prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation? In: Raviele A (ed) Cardiac arrhythmias Springer, Milan, pp 492–497Google Scholar
- 23.de Vusser P, Mairesse GH, Van Mieghem W et al (2001) Significant reduction in atrial fibrillation using circadian overdrive pacing at 80/65 ppm. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 24:663AGoogle Scholar