Role of Electrical Therapy in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction: The Clinical Cardiologist’s Experience

  • F. Nacci
  • F. Fino
  • V. F. Napoli
  • S. Favale
Conference paper


The prevalence of intraventricular conduction delays in patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and chronic heart failure (CHF) has been estimated at 30%-50%. These abnormalities negatively affect both systolic and diastolic ventricular function causing uncoordinated contractions between the left and the right ventricles and between the various segments of the LV wall [1-9], and have been associated with an unfavorable prognosis [10-15]. The most common expression of the presence of intraventricular conduction delays is left bundle branch block (LBBB). Cardiac resynchronization by LV or biventricular pacing has recently been introduced to treat patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) who respond poorly to optimal medical therapy, LV systolic dysfunction, and intraventricular conduction delays, based on the hypothesis that LV pacing, possibly associated with right ventricular pacing, can restore the physiological coordination of ventricular contraction.


Chronic Heart Failure Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Leave Bundle Branch Block NYHA Class 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Wilensky RL, Yudelman P, Cohen Al etal (1988) Serial electrocardiographic changes in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy confirmed at necropsy. Am J Cardiol 62:276–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xiao HB, Roy C, Fujimoto S etal (1996) Natural history of abnormal conduction and its relation to prognosis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol 53:163–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xiao HB, Roy C, Gibson DG (1994) Nature of ventricular activation in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: evidence for bilateral bundle branch block. Br Heart J 72:167–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Askenazi J, Alexander JH, Koenigsberg DI et al (1984) Alteration of left ventricular performance by left bundle branch block simulated with atrioventricular sequential pacing. Am J Cardiol 53:99–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rosenqvist M, Isaaz K, Botvinick EH et al (1991) Relative importance of activation sequence compared to atrioventricular synchrony in left ventricular function. Am J Cardiol 67:148–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Murkofsky RL, Dangas G, Diamond JA et al (1998) A prolonged QRS duration on surface electrocardiogram is a specific indicator of left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 32:476–482PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hamby RI, Weissman RH, Prakash MN et al (1983) Left bundle branch block: a predictor of poor left ventricular function in coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 106:471–477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Auricchio A, Salo RW (1997) Acute hemodynamic improvements by pacing in patients with severe congestive heart failure. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 20:313–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grines CL, Bashore TM, Boudoulas H et al (1989) Functional abnormalities in isolated left bundle branch block: the effect of interventricular asynchrony. Circulation 79:845–853PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wilensky RL, Yudelman P, Cohen AI et al (1988) Serial electrocardiographic changes in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy confirmed at necropsy. Am J Cardiol 1988;62:276–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aaronson KD, Schwartz JS, Chen TM et al (1997) Development and prospective evaluation of a clinical index to predict survival in ambulatory patients referred for cardiac transplant evaluation. Circulation 95:2660–2667PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shamim W, Francis DP, Yousufùddin M. et al (1999) Intraventricular conduction delay: a prognostic marker in chronic heart failure. Int J Cardiol 70:171–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Likoff MJ, Chandler SL, Kay HR (1987) Clinical determinants of mortality in chronic congestive heart failure secondary to idiopathic dilated or to ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 59:634–638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Venkateshar K, Gottipaty SLF et al, for the VEST investigators (2000) The resting electrocardiograrn provides a sensitive and inexpensive marker of prognosis in patients with chronic congestive heart failure (abstract). J Am Coll Cardiol 33:145AGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Silvet H, Padmanabham S, Pai R (1999) Increased QRS duration reduces survival in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: results from a cohort of 2263 patients (abstract). J Am Coll Cardiol 33:145AGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, Block M et al (1999) Effect of pacing chamber and atrio-ventricular delay on acute systolic function of paced patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation 99:2993–3001PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Etienne Y, Mansourati J, Gilard M et al (1999) Evaluation of left ventricular based pacing in patients with congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 83:1138–1140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leclercq C, Cazeau S, Le Breton H et al (1998) Acute hemodynamic effects of biventricular DDD pacing in patients with end-stage heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 32:1825–1831Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Blanc JJ, Etienne Y, Gilard M et al (1997) Evaluation of different ventricular pacing sites in patients with severe heart failure. Results of an acute hemodynamic study. Circulation 96:3273–3277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Foster AH, Gold MR, McLauglin JS (1995) Acute hemodynamic effects of atrio-biventricular pacing in humans. Ann Thorac Surg 59:294–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kass D, Chen-Huan C, Curry C et al (1999) Improved left ventricular mechanics from acute VDD pacing in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and ventricular conduction delay. Circulation 99:1567–1573PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Saxon LA, Kerwin WF, Cahalan MK et al (1998) Acute effects of intraoperative multi-site ventricular pacing on left ventricular function and activation/contraction sequence in patients with depressed ventricular function. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 9:13–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gras D, Mabo P, Tang T et al (1998) Multisite pacing as a supplemental treatment of congestive heart failure: preliminary results of the Medtronic Inc In Sync Study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 21:2249–2255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gras D, Ritter P, Lazarus A et al (2000) Long-term outcome of advanced heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (abstract). Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 23:658Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bakker P, Chin K, Sen A et al (1995) Biventricular pacing improves functional capacity in patients with end-stage congestive heart failure. Early experience. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19:1748–1757Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Braunschweig F, Linde C, Gadler F, Rydén L (2000) Reduction of hospital days by biventricular pacing. J Heart Fail 2:399–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zardiní M, Tritto M, Bargiggia G et al (2000) The InSync Italian Registry: analysis of clinical outcome and considerations on the selection of candidates to left ventricular resynchronization. Eur Heart J Supplements 2 [Suppl J]: J16–J22Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Porciani MC, Puglisi A, Colella A et al (2000) Echocardiographic evaluation of the effect of biventricular pacing: the InSync Italian Registry. Eur Heart J Supplements 2 [Suppl J]: J23–J30Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Leclercq C, Cazeau S, Ritter P et al (2000) A pilot experience with permanent biventricular pacing to treat advanced heart failure. Am Heart J 140:862–870PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bakker PF, Meijburg H, de Vries JW et al (2000) Biventricular pacing in end-stage heart failure improves functional capacity and left ventricular function. J Intery Card Electrophysiol 4:395–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cazeau S, Ritter P, Bakdach S et al (1994) Four chamber pacing in dilated cardiomyopathy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 17:1974–1979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cazeau S, Ritter P, Lazarus A et al (1996) Multisite pacing for end-stage heart failure: early experience. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19:1748–1757PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, Block M, Mortensen P (1998) Clinical and objective improvements in severe congestive heart failure patients using univentricular or biventricular pacing: preliminary results of a randomized prospective study (abstract). J Am Coll Cardiol 31 [Suppl A]:31AGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, Sack S et al (1999) The Pacing Therapies for Congestive Heart Failure (PATH-CHF) study: rationale, design, and endpoints of a prospective randomized multicenter study. Am J Cardiol 83[Suppl 5B]:130D–135DPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Saxon LA, Boehmer JP, Hummel J et al (1999) VIGOR CHF and VENTAK CHF Investigators. Biventricular pacing in patients with congestive heart failure: two prospective randomized trials. Am J Cardiol 83[Suppl 513]:120D–123DPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, Sack S et al (2000) Chronic benefit as a result of pacing in congestive heart failure: results of the PATH-CHF trials (abstract). Circulation 102:3352AGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cazeau S, Leclercq C, Lavergne T et al (2001) Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay. N Engl J Med 344:873–880PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Abraham WT, Fisher W, Smith A et al (2002) Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 24:1845–1853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Alonso C, Leclercq C, Victor F et al (1999) Electrocardiographic predictive factors of long-term clinical improvement with multisite biventricular pacing in advanced heart failure. Am J Cardiol 84:1417–1721PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Leclercq C, Victor F, Alonso C et al (2000) Comparative effects of permanent biventricular pacing for refractory heart failure in patients with stable sinus rhythm or chronic atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 85:1154–1156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gold MR, Feliciano Z, Gottlieb SS, Fisher ML (1995) Dual-chamber pacing with a short atrioventricular delay in congestive heart failure: a randomized study. J Am Coll Cardiol 26:967–973PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Linde C, Gadler F, Edner M et al (1995) Results of atrioventricular synchronous pacing with optimized delay in patients with severe congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 75:919–923PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Walker S, Levy TM, Rex S et al (2000) Usefulness of suppression of ventricular arrhythmia by biventricular pacing in severe congestive cardiac failure. Am J Cardiol 86:231–233.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Higgins SL, Yong P, Scheck D et al (2000) Biventricular pacing diminishes the need for implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 36:824–827PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Nacci
    • 1
  • F. Fino
    • 1
  • V. F. Napoli
    • 2
  • S. Favale
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto di CardiochirurgiaUniversità di BariBariItaly
  2. 2.Divisione di CardiologiaFondazione S. Maugeri IRCCSBariItaly

Personalised recommendations