Skip to main content

Ha ancora un senso la GDHT nel perioperatorio del paziente a rischio?

  • Chapter
Book cover Excerpta Anestesiologica
  • 363 Accesses

Riassunto

Il principio sul quale si basa il convincimento che la GDHT (Goal Directed Hemodynamic Therapy) è importante nel diminuire la mortalità, le complicanze e la LOS (lenght of stay, durata della degenza) dei pazienti a rischio sottoposti a chirurgia (essenzialmente chirurgia addominale, toracica, vascolare, nel politrauma, nei settici e, in genere, chirurgia dove sono prevedibili larghe perdite ematiche) è quello che lo stress chirurgico può essere favorevolmente affrontato solo con una disponibilità di O2 indicizzata (DO2I) adeguata alle esigenze metaboliche (CaO2 · CI · 10 = ⩾ 600 ml/m2/min). In caso contrario l’ossigenazione tessutale può essere insoddisfacente soprattutto in alcuni distretti (in primis quello intestinale) con l’insorgenza di complicanze (per esempio, ileo paralitico di lunga durata) a loro volta causa di altre (per esempio, tachicardia, ipotensione, ischemie miocardiche) che, come minimo, allungano la LOS, ma che possono anche aumentare la mortalità.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. Boyd O et al (1993) A randomized clinical trial of the effect of deliberate perioperative increase of oxygen delivery on mortality in high risk surgical patients. JAMA 270:2699–2707

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ciofolo MJ (1989) Changes in ventilation, oxygen uptake and CO2 out up during recovery from anesthesia. Anesthesiology 70:737–741

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Conway DH et al (2002) Randomized controlled trial investigating the influence of intravenous fluid filtration using aesophageal Doppler monitoring during bowel surgery. Anaesthesia 57:845–849

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. De Baker D et al (2006) The effects of dobutamine on microcirculatory alterations in patients with septic shock are independent of its systemic effects. Crit Care 34:403–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Durairaj L et al (2008) Fluid therapy in resuscitated sepsis. Chest 133:252–263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Euro J Anaesth 24:1028–1033

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gan TJ et al (2002) Goal directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery. Anesthesiology 97:820–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gueret G, Kiss G, Khaldi S et al (2007) Comparison of cardiac output measurements between NICO and the pulmonary artery catheter during repeat surgery for total hip replacement. Eur J Anestesiol 24:1028–1033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kern JW et al (2002) Meta analysis of hemodynamic optimization in high-risk patients. Crit Care Med 30:1686–1692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee GDJ (1994) The pulmonary circulation. In: Wagner WW, Weir EK, The pulmonary circulation and gas exchange, Futura, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lobo SM et al (2000) Effects of maximizing oxygen delivery on morbidity and mortality in high risk surgical patients. Crit Care Med 28:3396–3404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lobo SM et al (2006) Prospective, randomized trial comparing fluids and dobutamine optimization of oxygen delivery in high risk surgical patients. Crit Care 10:872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lobo SM et al (2008) Early optimisation of oxygen delivery in high-risk surgical patients. In: Vincente JL (ed), Yearbook of intensive care and emergency medicine, Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mythen MG et al (1995) Perioperative lasma volume expansion reduces the incidence of gut mucosal hypoperfusion during cardiac surgery. Arch Surg 130:423–429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Older P et al (1993) Preoperative evaluation of cardiac failure and ischemia in elderly patients by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Chest 104:701–704

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Older P et al (1999) Cardiopulmonary exercise testing as a screening test for perioperative management of major surgery in the elderly. Chest 116:355–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pearse RM et al (2006) Identification and characterization of the high risk surgical population in the United Kingdom. Crit Care 10:R 81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sageman WS et al (2002) Equivalence of bioimpedance and thermodilution in measuring cardiac index after cardiac surgery. JCVA 16:8–14

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shoemaker WC et al (1988) Prospective trial of supranormal values of survivors as therapeutic goals in high risk surgical patients. Chest 94:1176–1186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Silver MB et al (2004) Evaluation of impedance cardiography as an alternative to pulmonary artery catheterization in Critical ill patients. CHF 10(Suppl 2):17–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sinclair S et al (1997) Intraoperative intravascular volume optimisation and length of stay after repair of proximal femoral fracture: Randomized trial. BMJ 315:909–912

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stone MD et al (2003) Effect of adding dopexamine to intraoperative volume expansion in patients undergoing major elective abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth 91:619–629

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Van De Water J et al (2003) Impedance Cardiography — The next vital sign technology? Chest 123:2028–2033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Venn R et al (2002) Randomized controlled trial to investigate influence of the fluid challenge on duration of hospital stay and perioperative morbidity in patients with hip fractures. Br J Anaesth 88:65–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wilson J et al (1999) Reducing a risk of major elective surgery: randomized controlled trial of preoperative optimisation of oxygen delivery. BMJ 318:1099–1103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Xiaoming J et al (2008) Risk factors for ARDS in patients receiving mechanical ventilation for >48 h. Chest 188:853–861

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yern SJ et al (2003) Sources of error in noninvasive PCBF measurements by partial rebreathing. Anesthesiology 98:881–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Allaria, B. (2011). Ha ancora un senso la GDHT nel perioperatorio del paziente a rischio?. In: Allaria, B. (eds) Excerpta Anestesiologica. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2023-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2023-8_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2022-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2023-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics