Skip to main content

Professionalism, Quality of Care and Pay-for-Performance Services

  • Conference paper
  • 1126 Accesses

Abstract

There is an ongoing, heated debate concerning the best model possible for health care systems to respond to public expectations. Our society requires changes — radical changes — that place the organisational apparatus of the health care system in a critical position. Public opinion, as well as the opinion of medical professionals, reflects doubts concerning the ability of physicians to preserve their current role in serving patients. The term professionalism is frequently found in the medical literature and in debates about how to obtain the best organisation of health care systems. Although there is no consensus regarding the definition of professionalism, the term is closely related to the moral principles and standards of care, handed down from generation to generation, that make up the foundations of the medical profession [1, 2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gullo A (2005) Professionalism, ethics and curricula for the renewal of the health system. In: Gullo A, Berlot G (eds) Perioperative and critical care medicine. Educational Issues. Springer, Milan, pp. 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gullo A, Murabito P, Besso J (2009) Professionalism. Intensive and critical care medicine. In: Gullo A, Besso J, Lumb PD, Williams GF (eds) World Federation Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. Springer, Milan, pp. 29–40

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lubahan JD (2005) Professionalism: the essence of competence. J Surg Orthop Ad 14 (2): 53–58

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bion JF, Abrusci T, Hibbert P et al (2010) Human factors in the management of the critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth 105 (1): 26–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gullo A, Santonocito C, Astuto M (2010) Professionalism as a pendulum to pay for performance in the changing world. Ann Int Med 11 (5): 186–187

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cruess SR, Cruess RL, Steinert Y (2010) Linking then teaching of professionalism to the social contract: a call for cultural humility 32 (5): 357–359

    Google Scholar 

  7. ABIM Foundation American Board of Internal Medicine (2002) Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter. Ann Int Med 5(3)136: 243–246

    Google Scholar 

  8. World Health Organization (2000) World health report 2000 - Health systems: improving performance. Available at http://www.who.int/whr/2000/en/. Accessed 15 Feb 2011

  9. Duckett S (2009) Health care leadership, quality and safety. Aust Health Rev 33 (3): 355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brody WR (2007) Remarks: Health care ’08: what’s promised/what’s possible. Available at http://web.jhu.edu/old/president/speeches/2007/health.html. Accessed 11 Feb 2011

  11. Social health insurance. www.Eldis.org. Accessed 18 Aug 2006 http://www.wiki-doc.org/index.php/National_health_insurance

    Google Scholar 

  12. Regional overview of social health insurance in south-east Asia, World Health Organization and overview of health care financing (2006) Retrieved August 18. http://www.searo.who.int/EN/Section1243/Section1382/Section1731.htm

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maio V, Manzoli L (2002) The Italian healthcare system: WHO ranking versus public perception. P&T 27 (6): 301–308

    Google Scholar 

  14. American Medical Association (2004) Physician pay for performance (PFP) initiatives. American Medical Association, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  15. Murabito P, Rubulotta F, Gullo A (2007) Quality management in the ICU: understanding the process and improving the art. Springer, Milan, pp. 345–404

    Google Scholar 

  16. World Alliance for Patient Safety (2008) Organization Web Site. World Health Organization. http://www.who.in/patientsafety/en/index.html retrieved 09-27. http:// www.who.int/patientsafety/information_centre/reports/Alliance_Forward_Programme_2008.pdf

  17. Tomlin J (1982) The deep sleep: 6,000 will die or suffer brain damage. WLS-TV Chicago, 20/20. April 22, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kohn L, Corrigan J, Donaldson M, (2000) To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. National Academies Press. ISBN: 9780309068376. http://www.iom.edu/Reports/1999/To-Err-is-Human-Building-A-Safer-Health-System.aspx

  19. Commonwealth Fund International survey (2005) Taking the pulse of health care systems. experiences of patients with health problems in six countries. http://content. healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/abstract/hlthaff.w5.509?ijkey=10nPOyqgRXKAM&keytype=ref&siteid=healthaff

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW et al (1995) The quality in Australian health care study. Med J Aust 163 (9): 458–471

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Department of Health Expert Group (2000) An organization with a memory. United Kingdom, http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/ PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4065083

    Google Scholar 

  22. Baker GR, Norton PG (2004) The Canadian Adverse Event Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital in Canada. Can Med Ass J 170(11):1678–1885

    Google Scholar 

  23. New Zealand Ministry of Health (2001) Adverse events in New Zealand public hospital: principal findings from a national survey. Available at http://www.moh. govt.nz/publications/adverseevents. Accessed 19 May 2008

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schioler T, Lipczak H, Pedersen BL et al (2001) Incidence of adverse events in hospitals. A retrospective study of medical records. Ugeskr Laeg 163 (39): 5370–5378

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. World Health Organization (2008) Ten facts on patient safety. World Health Assembly. 19–24 May 2008 http://www.who.int/patientsafety/events/08/en/index. html

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gaba DM (2000) Anesthesiology as a model for patient safety in health care. Medical Care 320: 785–788

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chelluri LP (2008) Quality and performance improvement in critical care. Indian J Crit Care Med 12 (2): 67–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hendrickson MA (2008) Pay for performance and medical professionalism. Q Manage Health Care 17 (1): 9–18

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA (1996) Editorials. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. Br Med J 312 (7023): 71–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Agency for Healthcare research and Quality: The National Guidelines Clearinghouse http://www.guideline.gov/browse/by-topic.aspx

    Google Scholar 

  31. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Providing national guidance on promoting good health

    Google Scholar 

  32. Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing the quality chasm. A new health system for the 21st century. National Academy Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rosenthal MB, Landon BE, Normand SL et al (2006) Pay for performance in commercial HMOs. N Engl J Med 355 (18): 1895–1902

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Baumann MH, Dellert E (2006) Performance measures and pay for performance. Chest 129 (1): 188–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Radwin MA (1993) Medicine, money and moral physician’s conflict of interest. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  36. Brown M, Heywood J (eds) (2002) Paying for performance. An international comparison. ME Sharpe, Armonk, NY

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bowman JS (2010) The success of failure: the paradox of performance pay. Review of public Personnel Administration 30 (1): 70–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Morris PE (2007) Critical care professionalism in the age of pay-for-performance: from ICUs to outpatient critical care clinics. Am J Crit Care 16 (3): 200–203

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fiorentini G, Iezzi E, Lippi Bruni M (2010) Incentives in primary care and their impact on potentially avoidable hospital admissions. Eur J Health Econ 28 [Epub ahead of print]

    Google Scholar 

  40. Grumback K, Osmond D, Vranizan K et al (1998) Primary care physicians experiences of financial incentives in managed-care systems. N Engl J Med 339: 1516–1521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Garret KE (2004) The measurement of health care performance. A primer for physicians. The management of health care performance. A primer from CMSS. United Health Care Services, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wharam JF, Paasche-Orlow MK, Farber NJ et al (2009) High quality care and ethical pay-for performance: a society of general internal medicine policy analysis. J Gen Intern Med 24 (7): 854–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Szalados JE (2007) Practice management issue: P4P and other things I better know about 60th Postgraduate Assembly in Anesthesiology. New York State Society of Anesthesiologists I, New York

    Google Scholar 

  44. Merril D, Sween S, Stead S (1989) Pay for performance: an overview. Newsletter American Society of Anesthesiologists 71: 13–14

    Google Scholar 

  45. Coleman K, Hamblin R (2007) Can pay-for-performance improve quality and reduce health disparities. PLoS Med 4 (6): e216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Casalino LP, Eister A (2007) Will pay-for-performance and quality reporting affect health care disparities? Health Aff (Millwood) 26: w405–w414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hamblin R (2007) Publishing quality measures: how it works and when it doesn’t. J Qual Health Care 19 (4): 183–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Moscussi M, Share D, Kline-Rogers et al (2002) The cross blue shield of Michigan cardiovascular consortium (BMC2) collaborative quality improvement initiative in percutaneous coronary intervention. J Interv Cardiol 15: 381–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB (2004) Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures. Surgery 135: 569–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Chekland K, Marshall M, Harrison S (2004) Re-thinking accountability: trust vs. confidence in medical practice. Qual Saf Health Care 13: 130–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Marshall M, Smith P (2003) Rewarding results. Using financial incentives to improve quality. Qual Saf Health Care 12: 397–398

    Google Scholar 

  52. Spooner A, Chapple A, Roland M (2001) What makes British general practitioners take part in a quality improvement scheme? J Health Serv Res Policy 6: 145–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Campbell A, Steiner A, Robinson J et al (2005) Do personal medical services contracts improve quality of care? A multi-modal evaluation. Health Serv Res Policy 10: 31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Glickman S, Ou F, DeLong ER et al (2007) Pay for performance, quality of care, and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 297: 2373–2380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Peterson L, Woodard L et al (2006) Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care? Ann Int Med 145: 265–272

    Google Scholar 

  56. Rosenthal MB, Dudley RA (2007) Pay-for-performance. Will the latest payment trend improve care? JAMA 297: 740–743

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Snyder L, Neubauer R, for the American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee (2007) Pay for performance principles that promote patient-centered care: an ethics manifesto. Ann Int Med 147: 792–794

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. American College of Physicians (2005) Ethics manual, 5th edn. Ann Int Med 142:560–582

    Google Scholar 

  59. Povar GJ, Glumen H, Daniel J et al (2004) Medicine as a profession Managed Care Ethics Working Group. Ethics in practice: managed care and the changing health care environment medicine as a profession managed care ethics working group statement. Ann Int Med 141: 131–136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Damberg CL, Shortell SM, Raube K et al (2010) Relationship between quality improvement processes and clinical performance. J Am J Manag Care 16 (8): 601–606

    Google Scholar 

  61. Lagasse RS, Johnstone RE (2008) Pay for performance in anesthesiology. Adv Anesth 26: 67–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. American College of Physicians (2007) Linking physicians payment to quality of care. Available at http://www.acponline.org/advocacy/events/state-of-healthcare/ linking.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2011

    Google Scholar 

  63. American College of Physicians (2007) The use of performance measurements to improve physician quality of care. http://www.acponline.org/running-practice/ ethics/issues/policy/p4p-ba.p

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gullo, A., Santonocito, C., Murabito, P., Astuto, M. (2011). Professionalism, Quality of Care and Pay-for-Performance Services. In: Gullo, A. (eds) Anaesthesia, Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine A.P.I.C.E.. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2014-6_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2014-6_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2013-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2014-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics