Advertisement

Medical Emergency Response in Toxicological Mass Casualty

  • P. L. Ingrassia
  • L. Ragazzoni
  • F. Della Corte
Conference paper

Abstract

Emergencies and disasters can occur anywhere in the world, affecting human health and lives and the infrastructure built to support them. Chemical releases arising from technological incidents, natural disasters, and conflict and terrorism are common [1]. The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies has estimated that between 1998 and 2007, there were nearly 3,200 technological disasters with approximately 100,000 people killed and nearly 2 million people affected. Unfortunately, the threat of major events involving chemicals is predicted to increase worldwide for three main reasons. First, the chemical industry is rapidly growing, and the number of chemicals available in the market is increasing [2]. Second, chemical incidents may have an impact beyond their original location, in some cases crossing national borders. Third, there is concern regarding the deliberate use of chemicals for terrorist purposes [3].

Keywords

Emergency Medical Service Personal Protective Equipment Mass Casualty Mass Casualty Incident Chemical Release 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Coleman L (2006) Frequency of man-made disasters in the 20th century. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 14: 3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arnold JL (2002) Disaster medicine in the 21st century: future hazards, vulnerabilities, and risks. Prehosp Disast Med 17 (1): 3–11Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Olowokure B, Pooransingh S, Tempopwski J et al (2005) Global surveillance for chemical incidents of international public health concern. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 83: 928–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lavitin HW, Siegelson HJ (2007) Hazardous materials emergencies. In: Hogan DE, Burstein JL (eds) Disaster medicine. Wolters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Appleton and Lange, Philadelphia, pp. 311–325Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Glossary of the Health Protection Agency, UK. Available at: http://www.hpa.org. uk. Accessed 1 Sep 2010Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Steinberg JL, Sengul H, Cruz AM (2008) Natech risk and management: an assessment of the state of the art. Nat Hazards 46: 143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jenkins BM (1997) Understanding the link between motives and methods. In: Roberts B (ed) Terrorism with chemical and biological weapons. The Chemical and Biological Arms Control Institute, Alexandria, pp. 51Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lillibridge SR (1997) Industrial disasters. In: Noji EK (ed) Public health consequences of disasters. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 354–372Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Culliman P (2002) Epidemiological assessment of health effects from chemical incidents. Occup Environ Med 59: 568–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bertazzi PA (1991) Long-term effects of chemical disasters. Lessons and results from Seveso. The Science of the Total Environment 106: 5–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pesatori AC, Consonni D, Bachetti S et al (2003) Short- and long-term morbidity and mortality in the population exposed to dioxin after the “Seveso Accident”. Industrial Health 41: 127–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lindell MK, Perry RW (1997) Hazardous materials releases in the Northridge earthquake: implications for seismic risk assessment. Risk Anal 17 (2): 147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cruz AM, Steinberg LJ (2005) Industry preparedness for hazardous materials accidents during the Kocaeli earthquake. Earthq Spectra 21 (2): 285–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cruz AM, Steinberg LJ, Vetere-Arellano et al (2004) State of the art in natech (natural hazard triggering technological disasters) risk assessment in Europe. Report EUR 21292 EN, DG Joint Research Centre, European Commission and United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, Ispra, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cruz AM, Steinberg LJ, Vetere-Arellano AL (2006) Emerging issues for natech disaster risk management in Europe, J Risk Res 9 (5): 483–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2006) Mass Casualty Predictor. Available at: http://www.bt.cdc.gov/masscasualties/predictor.asp. Accessed 1 Sep 2010Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sidell FR (1997) Nerve agents. In: Sidell FR, Takafuji ET, Franz DR (eds) Textbook of military medicine. medical aspects of chemical and biological warfare. Office of the Surgeon General, US Army, Virginia, pp. 129–179Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee ED (2003) Clinical manifestations of sarin nerve gas exposure. JAMA 290: 659 - 662PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krivoy A, Layish I, Rotman E et al (2005) OP or Not-OP: the medical challenge at the chemical terrorism scene. Prehosp Disast Med 20: 155–158Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jenkins JL, McCarthy ML, Sauer LM et al (2008) Mass-casualty triage: Time for an evidence-based approach. Prehospital Disast Med 23 (1): 3–8Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cone D, Koenig KL (2005) Mass casualty triage in the chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear environment. Eur J Emerg Med 12: 287–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cone DC, MacMillan DS, Parwani V, Van Gelder C (2008) Pilot test of a proposed chemical/biological/radiation/ nuclear-capable mass casualty triage system. Prehosp Emerg Care 12 (2): 236–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    START TRIAGE. Available at http://www.start-triage.com. Accessed 06 Sep 2010Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Levitin H, Siegelson H (2002) Hazardous materials emergencies. Disaster Medicine. Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp. 258–273Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Levitin H, Siegelson HJ, Dickinson S et al (2003) Decontamination of mass casualties - Re-evaluating existing dogma. Prehosp Disast Med 18 (3): 200–207Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Moran K, O’Reilly T, Munster A (1987) Chemical burns. A ten-year experience. Am Surg 53 (11): 652–653PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Clarke SFJ, Chilcott RP, Wilson JC et al (2008) Decontamination of multiple casualties who are chemically contaminated: A challenge for acute hospitals. Prehospital Disast Med 23 (2): 175–181Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Okumura T, Kondo H, Nagayama H et al (2007) Simple triage and rapid decontamination of mass casualties with the colored clothes pegs (STARDOM-CCP) system against chemical releases. Prehosp Disast Med 22 (3): 233–236Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Markel G, Krivoy A, Rotman E et al (2008) Medical Management of Toxicological Mass Casualty Events. Isr Med Assoc J 10 (11): 761–766PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    US Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA): OSHA General description and discussion of the levels of protection and protective gear.—1910.120 App B. Available at http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp. show_document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=9767. Accessed 10 Sep 2010
  31. 31.
    Barelli A, Gargano F, Proietti R (2005) La gestione intraospedaliera dei pazienti esposti ad armi chimiche di distruzione di massa. Ann Ist Super Sanita 41 (1): 93–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Phelps S (2006) Mission failure: Emergency medical services response to chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive events. Prehospital Disast Med 22 (4): 293–296Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schumacher J, Weidelt L, Gray SA, Brinker A (2009) Evaluation of bag-valve- mask ventilation by paramedics in simulated chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear environments. Prehosp Disaster Med 24 (5): 398–401PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Baker D (2005) The problem of secondary contamination following chemical agent release. Critical Care 9: 323–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    World Health Organization (1997) Assessing the health consequences of major chemical incidents — epidemiological approach. WHO regional publications, European series; No79Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Urbanetti J, Newmark J (2009) Clinical aspects of large-scale chemical events. In: Koenig KL, Schultz CH (eds) Koenig and Schultz’s Disaster Medicine: Comprehensive Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 430–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Baker D (2004) Civilian exposure to toxic agents: Emergency medical response. Prehosp Disast Med 19 (2): 174–178Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sigurdsson GH (2004) Anesthesiologists Should Be Familiar with the Management of Victims of Terrorist Attacks. Anesth Analg 98: 1743–1745PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    White SM (2002) Chemical and biological weapons: implications for anaesthesia and intensive care. Br J Anaesth 89: 306–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Barnes G, Baxter J, Litva A, Staples B (2002) The social and psychological impact of the chemical contamination incident in Weston Village, UK: a qualitative analysis. Social Science & Medicine 55: 2227–2241Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Galea S, Ahern J, Resnick H et al (2002) Psychological sequelae of the September 11 terrorist attacks in New York City. N Engl J Med 346: 982–987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schlenger WE, Caddell JM, Ebert L et al (2002) Psychological reactions to terrorist attacks: findings from the national study of American’s reactions to September 11. JAMA 288: 581–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Brennan RJ, Waeckerle JF, Sharp TW, Lillibridge SR (1999) Chemical warfare agents: Emergency medical and emergency public health issues. Ann Emerg Med August 34: 191–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gallacher J, Bronstering K, Palmer S et al (2007) Symptomatology attributable to psychological exposure to a chemical incident: a natural experiment. J Epidemiol Community Health 61: 506–512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    CBRN Task Force Statement, WCDEM 2007 (2008) The Provision of care for victims of chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear releases: the position of the World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine. Prehosp Disaster Med 23 (1): 95–96Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. L. Ingrassia
  • L. Ragazzoni
  • F. Della Corte

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations