Skip to main content

Abstract

Right- and left-breast mammograms are traditionally displayed back-to-back, projection for projection, to facilitate the perception of areas of asymmetry, which may on occasion be the only manifestation of breast cancer on standard mammographic views. Asymmetry is usually distinguished from mass in that it demonstrates concave-outward rather than the convex-outward contours typical of a mass, and that it is interspersed with fat rather than appearing denser in the center than at the periphery (typical of a mass). There are four types of asymmetry, all of which represent areas of fibroglandular-density tissue that is more extensive in one breast than the other:

  1. 1.

    Summation artifact: This is caused by superimposition of normal fibroglandular breast structures on a given mammographic projection. As such, this finding will be visible on only one of the two standard views and will not be seen on additional views taken in different projections. One must distinguish summation artifact from the other types of asymmetry described below, because it never represents breast cancer and should not be subjected to biopsy. A one-view-only mammographic finding is called an asymmetry prior to diagnostic imaging evaluation. Most (>75%) asymmetries represent summation artifacts; the rest are found to be other types of asymmetry or masses.

  2. 2.

    Global asymmetry: formerly called asymmetric breast tissue, represents a greater volume of fibroglandular tissue in one breast than in the corresponding location in the opposite breast, without associated mass, microcalcification, or architectural distortion. It is found in approximately 3% of screening mammography examinations. It almost always represents a normal variant, but occasionally it may indicate the presence of an underlying breast cancer if it corresponds to a palpable abnormality. In this latter clinical setting, the radiologist usually will recall the patient for additional imaging evaluation.

  3. 3.

    Focal asymmetry: formerly called focal asymmetric density, is an asymmetry of fibroglandular-tissue density seen on two different mammographic projections but lacking the convex-outward contours and conspicuity of a mass. It usually represents an island of normal dense breast tissue, but its lack of specific benign characteristics may warrant further evaluation, especially if it is not interspersed with fat. In a retrospective study of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers, 3% were identified as focal asymmetries. The likelihood of malignancy among findings characterized as focal asymmetry (without associated mass, calcifications, architectural distortion, sonographic abnormality, or palpable correlate) is <1%.

  4. 4.

    Developing asymmetry: formerly called developing density or neodensity, is a focal asymmetry that is new, larger, or denser on current examination than previously. To identify such a lesion, one must have prior mammograms available for comparison. In a retrospective study of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers, 6% were identified as developing asymmetries. The likelihood of malignancy among findings characterized as developing asymmetry is approximately 15%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Suggested Reading

  • Bassett LW (2000) Imaging of breast masses. Radiol Clin North Am 38:669–691

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D’Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM et al (2003) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), 4th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB et al (2011) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), 5th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopans DB, Swann CA, White G et al (1989) Asymmetric breast tissue. Radiology 171:639–643

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leung JWT, Sickles EA (2000) Multiple bilateral masses detected on screening mammography: assessment of need for recall imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:23–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leung JWT, Sickles EA (2007) Developing asymmetry identified on mammography: correlation with imaging outcome and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:667–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz M (1983) The predictive value of certain mammographic signs in screening for breast cancer. Cancer 51:1007–1010

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piccoli CW, Feig SA, Palazzo JP (1999) Developing asymmetric breast tissue. Radiology 211:111–117

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Samardar P, de Paredes ES, Grimes MM, Wilson JD (2002) Focal asymmetric densities seen at mammography: US and pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 22:19–33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sickles EA (1984) Mammographic features of “early” breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 143:461–464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sickles EA (1986) Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 146:661–663

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sickles EA (1989) Breast masses: mammographic evaluation. Radiology 173:297–303

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sickles EA (1994) Nonpalpable, circumscribed, noncalcified solid breast masses: likelihood of malignancy based on lesion size and age of patient. Radiology 192:439–442

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sickles EA (1995) Management of probably benign breast lesions. Radiol Clin North Am 33:1123–1130

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sickles EA (1998) Findings at mammographic screening on only one standard projection: outcomes analysis. Radiology 208:471–475

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sickles EA (2007) The spectrum of breast asymmetries: imaging features, work-up, management. Radiol Clin North Am 45:765–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sickles, E.A. (2011). Mammography: Asymmetries, Masses, and Architectural Distortion. In: Hodler, J., von Schulthess, G.K., Zollikofer, C.L. (eds) Diseases of the Heart and Chest, Including Breast 2011–2014. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1938-6_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1938-6_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1937-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1938-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics