Skip to main content

Capire come mai le cose vanno male

  • Chapter
La sicurezza del paziente

Riassunto

Alle 17.00 circa di giovedì 4 gennaio 2001 David James, un paziente in day-hospital nel reparto E17 del Queen’s Medical Centre Nottingham (QMC), venne preparato per la somministrazione intratecale (spinale) di chemioterapico, come previsto dal programma medico di mantenimento dopo il positivo trattamento di una forma di leucemia. Dopo aver eseguito la puntura lombare e aver somministrato la corretta terapia citotossica (citosina), sotto la supervisione del medico specialista dottor Mitchell, lo specializzando dottor North ricevette dal dottor Mitchell un secondo farmaco da somministrare al paziente, che in seguito morì. Purtroppo il secondo farmaco, la vincristina, non dovrebbe mai essere somministrato per via intratecale, perché è quasi sempre fatale. Sfortunatamente, nonostante la rapidità con cui venne effettuato il trattamento d’emergenza nel tentativo di riparare all’errore, alle ore 8.10 del 2 febbraio 2001 il paziente morì. (Toft, 2001)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  • Balen P (2004) Gross negligence manslaughter. Clinical Risk, 10:25–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgmeier J (2002) Failure mode and effect analysis: an application in reducing risk in blood transfusion. Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 28(6):331–339

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carayon P, Schoofs Hundt A, Karsh BT et al (2006) Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 15(Suppl 1):i50–i58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dean B, Schachter M, Vincent CA, Barber N (2002) Causes of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: a prospective study. The Lancet, 359:1373–1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeRosier J, Stalhandske E, Bagian JP, Nudell MS (2002) Using health care failure mode and effect analysis: the VA National Center for Patient Safety’s prospective risk analysis system. Joint Commission Journal on Quality & Safety, 28:248–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich RL (2000) On error management: lessons from aviation. British Medical Journal, 320: 781–785

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook J (2003) The criminalisation of fatal medical mistakes. British Medical Journal, 327:1118–1119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joice P, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (1998) Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery — a human realiability analysis. Applied Ergonomics, 29(6):409–414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan B (1994) A Guide to Practical Human Reliability Assessment. Taylor and Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons M, Adams S,Woloshynowych M, Vincent CA (2004) Human reliability analysis in healthcare: a review of techniques. International Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine, 16(4):223–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Pate-Cornell ME, Bea RG (1992) Management errors and system reliability: a probabilistic approach and application to offshore platforms. Risk Analysis, 12(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason JT (1990) Human Error. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason JT (1997) Managing the Risks of Organisational Accidents. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason JT (2001) Understanding adverse events: the human factor. In: Vincent C (ed) Clinical Risk Management: Enhancing Patient Safety, 2nd edn. BMJ Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Redmill R, Rajan J (1997) Human Factors in Safety Critical Systems. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers S (2002) A structured approach for the investigation of clinical incidents in healthcare: application in a general practice setting. British Journal of General Practice, 52(suppl 52):S30–S32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spath P (1999) Error Reduction in Health Care: A Systems Approach to Improving Patient Safety. AHA Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Adams S, Vincent C (2004) Systems analysis of clinical incidents: the London Protocol. www.cpssq.org

  • Toft B (2001) External Inquiry into the adverse incident that occurred at Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, 4th January 2001. Department of Health, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent C, Taylor-Adams S, Stanhope N (1998) Framework for analysing risk and safety in clinical medicine. British Medical Journal, 316:1154–1157

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent C (2004) Analysis of clinical incidents: a window on the system not a search for root causes. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 13(4):242–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JC (1985) Validation of human reliability assessment technique. Reliability Engineering, 11:149–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2011). Capire come mai le cose vanno male. In: Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Bellandi, T. (eds) La sicurezza del paziente. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1875-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1875-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1874-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1875-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics