Riassunto
Nell’ultimo decennio sono stati compiuti notevoli sforzi per migliorare la sicurezza dell’assistenza sanitaria. I pazienti sono dunque più sicuri di quanto fossero dieci anni fa? La risposta a questa semplice domanda è stranamente elusiva. Sebbene alcuni aspetti della sicurezza (per esempio, la prevenibilità) siano difficili da misurare per ragioni tecniche, il problema più sostanziale è che, malgrado le energie spese e le iniziative attuate, la misurazione e la valutazione non sono state tra le priorità. È una faccenda curiosa. Se siete impegnati nel tentativo di ridurre le patologie cardiache, il cancro o gli incidenti stradali, la prima domanda che vi porrete sarà: “quante persone soffrono di patologie cardiache?”, oppure “quanti incidenti stradali si verificano ogni anno?”, e in seguito vorrete sapere se di anno in anno il numero si va riducendo.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliografia
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2006) Patient Safety Indicators Overview. AHRQ Quality Indicators (http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/psi_overview.htm)
Aiken LH, Sloane DM, Sochalski J (1998) Hospital organisation and outcomes. Quality in Health Care, 7(4):222–226
Al Sarira AA, David G, Willmott S et al (2007) Oesophagectomy practice and outcomes in England. The British Journal of Surgery, 94(5):585–591
Aylin P, Tanna S, Bottle A, Jarman J (2004) Dr Foster’s case notes: how often are adverse events reported in English hospital statistics? British Medical Journal, 329:369
Barber N, Franklin BD, Comford T et al (2006) Safer, Faster, Better? Evaluating Electronic Prescribing. Report to the Patient Safety Research Programme. Department of Health, London
Bevan G, Hood C (2006) Have targets improved performance in the English NHS? British Medical Journal, 332:419–422
Bottle A, Aylin P (2008) Intelligent information: a national system for monitoring clinical performance. Health Services Research, 43(1 Pt 1):10–31
Bridgewater B, Grayson AD, Brooks N et al (2007) Has the publication of cardiac surgery outcome data been associated with changes in practice in northwest England: an analysis of 25,730 patients undergoing CABG surgery under 30 surgeons over 8 years. Heart, 93(6):744–748
Burke JP (2003) Infection control — A problem for patient safety. The New England Journal of Medicine, 348(7):651–656
Chassin MR (2002) Achieving and sustaining improved quality: lessons from New York State and cardiac surgery. Health Aff (Millwood), 21(4):40–51
Darzi A (2009) High Quality Care for All. Department of Health, London
Donabedian A (2003) An Introduction to Quality Assurance in Health Care. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kazandjian VA, Wicker KG, Matthes N, Ogunbo S (2008) Safety is part of quality: a proposal for a continuum in performance measurement. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 14(2):354–359
Lilford R, Mohammed MA, Spiegelhalter D, Thomson R (2004) Use and misuse of process and outcome data in managing performance of acute medical care: avoiding institutional stigma. Lancet, 363:1147–1154
Main DS, Henderson WG, Pratte K et al (2007) Relationship of processes and structures of care in general surgery to postoperative outcomes: a descriptive analysis. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 204(6):1157–1165
Mayer EK, Chow A, Vale JA, Athanasiou T (2009) Appraising the quality of care in surgery. World Journal of Surgery, 33(8):1584–1593
Olsen S, Neale G, Schwab K et al (2007) Hospital staff should use more than one method to detect adverse events and potential adverse events: incident reporting, pharmacist surveillance and local real-time record review may all have a place. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 16(1): 40–44
Pronovost PJ, Dang D, Dorman T et al (1999) ICU nurse to patient ratio greater than 1 to 2 associated with an increased risk of complications in abdominal aortic surgery patients. Critical Care Medicine, 27(12):A27
Pronovost PJ, Miller MR, Wachter RM (2006) Tracking progress in patient safety — an elusive target. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296(6):696–699
Raftery J, Roderick P, Stevens A (2005) Potential use of routine databases in health technology assessment. Health Technology Assessment, 9(20):iii–iv
Raleigh VS, Cooper J, Bremner SA, Scobie S (2008) Patient safety indicators for England from hospital administrative data: case-control analysis and comparison with US data. British Medical Journal, 337:a1702
Vincent C, Aylin P, Franklin BD et al (2008) Is healthcare getting safer? British Medical Journal, 337:a2426
Wachter RM (2006) Expected and unanticipated consequences of the quality and information technology revolutions. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(23):2780–2783
West MA, Borrill C, Dawson J et al (2002) The link between the management of employees and patient mortality in acute hospitals. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(8):1299–1310
Zegers M, de Bruijne MC, Wagner C et al (2009) Adverse events and potentially preventable deaths in Dutch hospitals: results of a retrospective patient record review study. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 18(4):297–302
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Italia
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2011). La misurazione della sicurezza. In: Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Bellandi, T. (eds) La sicurezza del paziente. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1875-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1875-4_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1874-7
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1875-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)