Skip to main content

La misurazione della sicurezza

  • Chapter
La sicurezza del paziente

Riassunto

Nell’ultimo decennio sono stati compiuti notevoli sforzi per migliorare la sicurezza dell’assistenza sanitaria. I pazienti sono dunque più sicuri di quanto fossero dieci anni fa? La risposta a questa semplice domanda è stranamente elusiva. Sebbene alcuni aspetti della sicurezza (per esempio, la prevenibilità) siano difficili da misurare per ragioni tecniche, il problema più sostanziale è che, malgrado le energie spese e le iniziative attuate, la misurazione e la valutazione non sono state tra le priorità. È una faccenda curiosa. Se siete impegnati nel tentativo di ridurre le patologie cardiache, il cancro o gli incidenti stradali, la prima domanda che vi porrete sarà: “quante persone soffrono di patologie cardiache?”, oppure “quanti incidenti stradali si verificano ogni anno?”, e in seguito vorrete sapere se di anno in anno il numero si va riducendo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2006) Patient Safety Indicators Overview. AHRQ Quality Indicators (http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/psi_overview.htm)

  • Aiken LH, Sloane DM, Sochalski J (1998) Hospital organisation and outcomes. Quality in Health Care, 7(4):222–226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Al Sarira AA, David G, Willmott S et al (2007) Oesophagectomy practice and outcomes in England. The British Journal of Surgery, 94(5):585–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aylin P, Tanna S, Bottle A, Jarman J (2004) Dr Foster’s case notes: how often are adverse events reported in English hospital statistics? British Medical Journal, 329:369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barber N, Franklin BD, Comford T et al (2006) Safer, Faster, Better? Evaluating Electronic Prescribing. Report to the Patient Safety Research Programme. Department of Health, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevan G, Hood C (2006) Have targets improved performance in the English NHS? British Medical Journal, 332:419–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bottle A, Aylin P (2008) Intelligent information: a national system for monitoring clinical performance. Health Services Research, 43(1 Pt 1):10–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgewater B, Grayson AD, Brooks N et al (2007) Has the publication of cardiac surgery outcome data been associated with changes in practice in northwest England: an analysis of 25,730 patients undergoing CABG surgery under 30 surgeons over 8 years. Heart, 93(6):744–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burke JP (2003) Infection control — A problem for patient safety. The New England Journal of Medicine, 348(7):651–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chassin MR (2002) Achieving and sustaining improved quality: lessons from New York State and cardiac surgery. Health Aff (Millwood), 21(4):40–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darzi A (2009) High Quality Care for All. Department of Health, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Donabedian A (2003) An Introduction to Quality Assurance in Health Care. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazandjian VA, Wicker KG, Matthes N, Ogunbo S (2008) Safety is part of quality: a proposal for a continuum in performance measurement. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 14(2):354–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lilford R, Mohammed MA, Spiegelhalter D, Thomson R (2004) Use and misuse of process and outcome data in managing performance of acute medical care: avoiding institutional stigma. Lancet, 363:1147–1154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Main DS, Henderson WG, Pratte K et al (2007) Relationship of processes and structures of care in general surgery to postoperative outcomes: a descriptive analysis. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 204(6):1157–1165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer EK, Chow A, Vale JA, Athanasiou T (2009) Appraising the quality of care in surgery. World Journal of Surgery, 33(8):1584–1593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen S, Neale G, Schwab K et al (2007) Hospital staff should use more than one method to detect adverse events and potential adverse events: incident reporting, pharmacist surveillance and local real-time record review may all have a place. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 16(1): 40–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pronovost PJ, Dang D, Dorman T et al (1999) ICU nurse to patient ratio greater than 1 to 2 associated with an increased risk of complications in abdominal aortic surgery patients. Critical Care Medicine, 27(12):A27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pronovost PJ, Miller MR, Wachter RM (2006) Tracking progress in patient safety — an elusive target. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296(6):696–699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raftery J, Roderick P, Stevens A (2005) Potential use of routine databases in health technology assessment. Health Technology Assessment, 9(20):iii–iv

    Google Scholar 

  • Raleigh VS, Cooper J, Bremner SA, Scobie S (2008) Patient safety indicators for England from hospital administrative data: case-control analysis and comparison with US data. British Medical Journal, 337:a1702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent C, Aylin P, Franklin BD et al (2008) Is healthcare getting safer? British Medical Journal, 337:a2426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wachter RM (2006) Expected and unanticipated consequences of the quality and information technology revolutions. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(23):2780–2783

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • West MA, Borrill C, Dawson J et al (2002) The link between the management of employees and patient mortality in acute hospitals. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(8):1299–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zegers M, de Bruijne MC, Wagner C et al (2009) Adverse events and potentially preventable deaths in Dutch hospitals: results of a retrospective patient record review study. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 18(4):297–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2011). La misurazione della sicurezza. In: Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Bellandi, T. (eds) La sicurezza del paziente. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1875-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1875-4_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1874-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1875-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics