Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Human Modelling in Assisted Transportation pp 33–41Cite as

To What Extent May Assistance Systems Correct and Prevent ‘Erroneous’ Behaviour of the Driver?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

An error in situational recognition may occur while driving a car, and the error can sometimes result in an ‘erroneous’ behaviour of the driver. Whether the driver assistance system can cope with such a circumstance depends on to what extent the authority is given to the system. This paper discusses the need of machine-initiated authority trading from the driver to the assistance system for assuring driver safety. A theoretical framework is also given to describe and analyze the driver’s overtrust in and overreliance on such a driver assistance system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Billings CE (1997) Aviation automation—the search for a human-centered approach. LEA, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cacciabue PC (2004) Guide to applying human factors methods: human error and accident management in safety critical systems. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  3. Convention on Road Traffic (1968) 1993 version & amendments in 2006

    Google Scholar 

  4. Endsley MR, Kiris EO (1995) The out-of-the-loop performance problem and the level of control in automation. Hum Factors 37(2):3181–3194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hollnagel E, Bye A (2000) Principles for modeling function allocation. Int J Hum–Comput Stud 52:253–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Inagaki T (2006) Design of human–machine interactions in light of domain-dependence of human-centered automation. Cogn Tech Work 8(3):161–167

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Inagaki T (2008) Smart collaborations between humans and machines based on mutual understanding. Annu Rev Control 32:253–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Inagaki T (2010) Traffic systems as joint cognitive systems: issues to be solved for realizing human-technology coagency. Cogn Tech Work. 12(2):153–162

    Google Scholar 

  9. Inagaki T, Stahre J (2004) Human supervision and control in engineering and music: similarities, dissimilarities, and their implications. Proc IEEE 92(4):589–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Inagaki T, Sheridan TB (2008) Authority and responsibility in human–machine systems: Is machine-initiated trading of authority permissible in the human-centered automation framework? In: Proceedings of applied human factors and ergonomics 2008 (CD-ROM) 10pp

    Google Scholar 

  11. Inagaki T, Itoh M, Nagai Y (2007) Support by warning or by action: Which is appropriate under mismatches between driver intent and traffic conditions? IEICE Trans Fundam E90-A(11):264–272

    Google Scholar 

  12. Inagaki T, Itoh M, Nagai Y (2008) Driver support functions under resource-limited situations. J Mech Syst Transportation Logistics 1(2):213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Klein G (1993) A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. In: Klein G et al (eds) Decision making in action. Ablex, New York, pp 138–147

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lee JD, Moray N (1992) Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human machine systems. Ergonomics 35(10):1243–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Meyer J (2001) Effects of warning validity and proximity on responses to warnings. Hum Factors 43(4):563–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. MLIT (2007) ASV; the bridge to an accident-free society. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Government of Japan

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mosier K, Skitka LJ, Heers S, Burdick M (1998) Automation bias: decision making and performance in high-tech cockpits. Int J Aviation Psychol 8:47–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Parasuraman R, Riley V (1997) Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Hum Factors 39(2):230–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Parasuraman R, Molloy R, Singh IL (1993) Performance consequences of automation-induced ‘complacency’. Int J Aviation Psychol 3(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sarter NB, Woods DD (1995) How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Hum Factors 37(1):5–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sarter NB, Woods DD, Billings CE (1997) Automation surprises. In: Salvendy G (ed) Handbook of human factors and ergonomics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 1926–1943

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sheridan TB, Parasuraman R (2005) Human–automation interaction. In: Nickerson RS (ed) Reviews of human factors and ergonomics, vol 1. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, pp 89–129

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wickens CD (1994) Designing for situation awareness and trust in automation. In: Proceedings of IFAC integrated systems engineering, pp 77–82

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Risk Engineering, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, 305-8573, Japan

    Toshiyuki Inagaki

Authors
  1. Toshiyuki Inagaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshiyuki Inagaki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. European Commission, Inst. for Protection & Security of Citz., Joint Research Centre, Ispra VA, 21020, Italy

    P. Carlo Cacciabue

  2. VTI, Linköping, Sweden

    Magnus Hjälmdahl

  3. Leiter Technologiecluster, Escherweg 2, Oldenburg, 26121, Germany

    Andreas Luedtke

  4. Kite Solutions, via Labiena 93, Laveno Mombello, 21014, Italy

    Costanza Riccioli

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Italia Srl

About this paper

Cite this paper

Inagaki, T. (2011). To What Extent May Assistance Systems Correct and Prevent ‘Erroneous’ Behaviour of the Driver?. In: Cacciabue, P., Hjälmdahl, M., Luedtke, A., Riccioli, C. (eds) Human Modelling in Assisted Transportation. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1821-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1821-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1820-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1821-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation