Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Updates in Surgery ((UPDATESSURG))

  • 734 Accesses

Abstract

Surgical strategy is the key to successful treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases. The use of intraoperative ultrasonography has become mandatory at the beginning of the operation, as it allows better staging of the disease but also during every step of the resection, guiding the hepatectomy such that it is safer and easier. Intraoperative ultrasonography makes parenchyma-sparing resections possible, improving the likelihood of better preserved postoperative liver function, decreasing the risk of liver dysfunction, and facilitating re-resection in case of hepatic recurrences. The role of laparoscopic resection is still debated, but its potential advantages include the fact that it offers a minimally invasive approach for selected patients with limited disease. Pedicle clamping is often used during resection to decrease intraoperative blood loss; its impact on outcome in patients with colorectal metastases is discussed herein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Choti MA, Kaloma F, de Oliveira ML et al (2008) Patient variability in intraoperative ultrasonographic characteristics of colorectal liver metastases. Arch Surg 143:29–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. DeOliveira ML, Pawlik TM, Gleisner AL et al (2007) Echogenic appearance of colorectal liver metastases on intraoperative ultrasonography is associated with survival after hepatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 11:970–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhattacharjya S, Bhattacharjya T, Baber S et al (2004) Prospective study of contrast-enhanced computed tomography, computed tomography during arterioportography, and magnetic resonance imaging for staging colorectal liver metastases for liver resection. Br J Surg 91:1361–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schmidt J, Strotzer M, Fraunhofer S et al (2000) Intraoperative ultrasonography versus helical computed tomography and computed tomography with arterioportography in diagnosing colorectal liver metastases: lesion-by-lesion analysis. World J Surg 24:43–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zacherl J, Scheuba C, Imhof M et al (2002) Current value of intraoperative sonography during surgery for hepatic neoplasms. World J Surg 26:550–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Foroutani A, Garland AM, Berber E et al (2000) Laparoscopic ultrasound vs triphasic computed tomography for detecting liver tumors. Arch Surg 135:933–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Torzilli G, Del Fabbro D, Palmisano A et al (2005) Contrastenhanced intraoperative ultrasonography during hepatectomies for colorectal cancer liver metastases. J Gastrointest Surg 9:1148–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leen E, Ceccotti P, Moug SJ et al (2006) Potential value of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography during partial hepatectomy for metastases: an essential investigation before resection? Ann Surg 243:236–40

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakano H, Ishida Y, Hatakeyama T et al (2008) Contrastenhanced intraoperative ultrasonography equipped with late Kupffer-phase image obtained by sonazoid in patients with colorectal liver metastases. World J Gastroenterol 14:3207–3211

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Mann CD, Neal CP, Metcalfe MS et al (2007) Clinical Risk Score predicts yield of staging laparoscopy in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 94(7):855–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jarnagin WR, Conlon K, Bodniewicz J et al (2001) A clinical scoring system predicts the yield of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with potentially resectable hepatic colorectal metastases. Cancer 91:1121–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Torzilli G, Montorsi M, Donadon M et al (2005) “Radical but conservative” is the main goal for ultrasonography-guided liver resection: prospective validation of this approach. J Am Coll Surg 201:517–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Makuuchi M, Hasegawa H, Yamazaki S et al (1987) Four new hepatectomy procedures for resection of the right hepatic vein and preservation of the inferior right hepatic vein. Surg Gynecol Obstet 164:68–72

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Capussotti L, Ferrero A, Viganò L et al (2006) Hepatic bisegmentectomy 7–8 for a colorectal metastasis. Eur J Surg Oncol 32:469–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Torzilli G, Montorsi M, Gambetti A et al (2005) Utility of the hooking technique for cases of major hepatectomy. Surg Endosc 19:1156–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chouillard E, Cherqui D, Tayar C et al (2003) Anatomical bi-and trisegmentectomies as alternatives to extensive liver resections. Ann Surg 238(1):29–34

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kokudo N, Tada K, Seki M et al (2001) Anatomical major resection versus nonanatomical limited resection for liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 181:153–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Muratore A, Conti P, Amisano M et al (2005) Bisegmentectomy 7-8 as alternative to more extensive liver resections. J Am Coll Surg 200:224–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamamoto J, Sugihara K, Kosuge T et al (1995) Pathologic support for limited hepatectomy in the treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 221:74–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kokudo N, Miki Y, Sugai S et al (2002) Genetic and histological assessment of surgical margins in resected liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma: minimum surgical margins for successful resection. Arch Surg 137:833–840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zorzi D, Mullen JT, Abdalla EK et al (2006) Comparison between hepatic wedge resection and anatomic resection for colorectal liver metastases. J Gastrointest Surg 10:86–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ferrero A, Viganò L, Lo Tesoriere R et al (2009) Bisegmentectomies as alternative to right hepatectomy in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Hepatogastroenterology 56:1429–35

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. KT Nguyen, TC Gamblin, Geller DA (2009) World Review of Laparoscopic Liver Resection-2,804 Patients. Ann Surg 250:831–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gayet B, Cavaliere D, Vibert E et al (2007) Totally laparoscopic right hepatectomy Am J Surg 194:685–689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cherqui D, Husson E, Hammoud R et al (2000) Laparoscopic liver resections: a feasibility study in 30 patients. Ann Surg 232:753–762

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Viganò L, Laurent A, Tayar C et al (2009) The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection: improved feasibility and reproducibility. Ann Surg 250:772–782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Laurent A, Cherqui D, Lesurtel M et al (2003) Laparoscopic liver resection for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma complicating chronic liver disease. Arch Surg 138:763–769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2009) The International Position on Laparoscopic Liver Surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008 Ann Surg 250:825–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cherqui D, Husson E, Hammoud R et al (2000) Laparoscopic liver resections: a feasibility study in 30 patients. Ann Surg 232:753–762

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Gigot JF, Glineur D, Santiago Azagra J et al (2002) Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Section of the Royal Belgian Society of Surgery and the Belgian Group for Endoscopic Surgery: Laparoscopic liver resection for malignant liver tumors: preliminary results of a multicenter European study Ann Surg 236:90–97

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Koffron AJ, Auffenberg G, Kung R et al (2007) Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution: less is more. Ann Surg 246:385–392

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Gigot JF, Glineur D, Santiago Azagra J et al (2002) Laparoscopic liver resection for malignant liver tumors: preliminary results of a multicenter European study. Ann Surg 236:90–97

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Viganò L, Tayar C, Laurent A, Cherqui D (2009) Laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 16:410–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Johnstone PAS, Rohde DC, Swartz Se et al (1996) Portsite recurrences after laparoscopic and thoracoscopic procedures in malignacy. J Clin Oncol 14:1950–1956

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Poulin EC, Mamazza J, Schlachta C et al (1995) Laparoscopic resection does not adversely affect early survival curves in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 229:487–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bryant R, Laurent A, Tayar C et al (2009) Laparoscopic Liver Resection-Understanding its Role in Current Practice The Henri Mondor Hospital Experience Ann Surg 250:103–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hompes D, Aerts R, Penninckx F et al (2007) Laparoscopic liver resection using radiofrequency coagulation. Surg Endosc 21:175–180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Vibert E, Perniceni T, Levard H et al (2006) Laparoscopic liver resection. Br J Surg 93:67–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Robles R, Marin C, Abellan B et al (2008) A new approach to hand-assisted laparoscopic liver surgery. Surg Endosc 22:2357–2364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Castaing D, Vibert E, Ricca L et al (2009) Oncologic Results of Laparoscopic Versus Open Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases in Two Specialized Centers. Ann Surg 250: 849–855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Nagorney DM, van Heerden JA, Ilstrup DM et al (1989) Primary hepatic malignancy: surgical management and determinants of survival. Surgery 106:740–749

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kooby DA, Stockman J, Ben-Porat L et al (2003) Influence of transfusion on perioperative and lomg-term outcome in patients following hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis. Ann Surg 237:860–869

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Yin XY, Lai PBS, Lee JFY et al (2000) Effects of hepatic blood inflow occlusion on liver regeneration following partial hepatectomy in an experimental model of cirrhosis. Br J Surg 87:1510–1515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Teoh NC, Farrell GC (2003) Hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury: pathogenic mechanisms and basis for hepatoprotection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 18:891–902

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Abu-Amara M, Gurusamy KS, Glantzounis G et al (2009) Pharmacological interventions for ischaemia reperfusion injury in liver resection surgery performed under vascular control. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4). Art No CD008154

    Google Scholar 

  46. Muratore A, Ribero D, Ferrero A et al (2003) Prospective randomized study of steroids in the prevention of ischaemic injury during hepatic resection with pedicle clamping. Br J Surg 90:17–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gurusamy KS, Kumar Y, Pamecha V et al (2009) Ischaemic pre-conditioning for elective liver resections performed under vascular occlusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1). Art No CD007629

    Google Scholar 

  48. Belghiti J, Noun R, Malafosse R et al (1999) Continuous versus intermittent portal triad clamping for liver resection. Ann Surg 229:369–375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Rahbari NN, Wente MN, Schemmer P et al (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of portal triad clamping on outcome after hepatic resection. Br J Surg 95:424–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Chouker A, Schachtner T, Schauer R et al (2004) Effects of Pringle manoeuvre and ischaemic preconditioning on haemodynamic stability in patients undergoing elective hepatectomy: a randomized trial. Br J Anaesth 93:204–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Capussotti L, Muratore A, Ferrero A et al (2006) Randomized clinical trial of liver resection with and without hepatic pedicle clamping. Br J Surg 93:685–689

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gotoh M, Monden M, Sakon M et al (1994) Hilar lobar vascular occlusion for hepatic resection. J Am Coll Surg 178:6–10

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Takayama T, Makuuchi M, Inoue K et al (1998) Selective and unselective clamping in cirrhotic liver. Hepato Gastroenterol 45:376–380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Wu C-C, Yeh D-C, Ho W-H et al (2002) Occlusion of hepatic blood inflow for complex central liver resections in cirrhotic patients. Arch Surg 137:1369–1376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. van der Bilt JD, Kranenburg O, Nijkamp MW et al (2005) Ischemia/reperfusion accelerates the outgrowth of hepatic micrometastases in a highly standardized murine model. Hepatology 42:165–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. van der Bilt JD, Kranenburg O, Borren A et al (2008) Ageing and hepatic steatosis exacerbate ischemia/reperfusion-accelerated outgrowth of colorectal micrometastases. Ann Surg Oncol 15:1392–1398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Buell JF, Koffron A, Yoshida A et al (2000) Is any method of vascular control superior in hepatic resection of metastatic cancers? Longmire clamping, pringle maneuver, and total vascular isolation. Arch Surg 136:569–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wong KH, Hamady ZZ, Malik HZ et al (2008) Intermittent Pringle manoeuvre is not associated with adverse long-term prognosis after resection for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 95:985–989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ferrero A, Russolillo N, Viganò L et al (2010) Does Pringle maneuver affect survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases? WJS in press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ferrero, A. (2011). Surgical Strategy. In: Capussotti, L. (eds) Surgical Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases. Updates in Surgery. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1809-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1809-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1808-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1809-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics