Skip to main content

Exploration Modes and Its Impact on Industry Profitability

The Differentiated Effects of Internal and External Ways to Access Market Knowledge

  • Conference paper
Decision Theory and Choices: a Complexity Approach

Part of the book series: New Economic Windows ((NEW))

Abstract

In the behavioural and evolutionary perspectives it is usually supposed that firms’ performance depends significantly on their exploration activities, because they enlarge firms’ knowledge base. The analysis has been here focused on accessing external knowledge, that is acquiring and managing others’ experience, and on developing internal knowledge, that is accumulating and using the own direct experience. The effects of these two exploration modes on profitability at industry and segment level with honest and dishonest agents has been investigated through an agent-based model of industry, whose firms, in order to achieve competitive advantages, look for the best suppliers. Firms are characterized by bounded rationality in terms of absorptive capacity and organizational memory. By testing six groups of hypotheses it is shown that indirect experience has the main positive impact, especially in contexts of opportunist behaviours. It also improves performance in terms of the speed to reach the maximum profitability, but conditionally to the presence of high degree of access and management of direct experience, and at the price of high instability of the collective outcomes. Even more interestingly, it clearly emerges that, even if submitted to almost the same rules and size, the industry segments of final producers and first tiers perform quite differently. Moreover, the two exploration modes and opportunism impact very differently on each industry segment. Consequently, their effects on single firms’ or collective profitability cannot be understood if it is not specified the specific segment where such firms are located. Moreover, the outcome at industry level strictly depends on industry structure and on the competitive pressure among suppliers and on the ratio of transactions occurring between each supplier-buyer pair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akerlof, G.A. 1970. The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 84(3):488–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonelli, C. 1999. The microdynamics of technological change. London: Routledge Argote, L. 1999. Organizational learning: creating, retaining and transferring knowledge. NY: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnulf, J.K., Dreyer, H.C. and Grenness, C.E. 2005. Trust and knowledge creation: how the dynamics of trust and absorptive capacity may affect supply chain management development projects. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications. 8(3):225–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann, R. and Zaheer, A. (eds.) 2006. Handbook of trust research. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M.L., Jermier, J.M. and Lafferty, B.A. 2006. Corporate reputation: the definitional landscape. Corporate Reputation Review. 9(1):26–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessant, J., Levy, P., Sang, B. and Lamming, R. 1994. Managing successful total quality relationships in the supply chain. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management. 1(1):7–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierly, P. and Chakrabarti, A. 1996. Generic knowledge strategies in the US pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal. 17:123–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierly III, P.E., Damanpour, F. and Santoro, M.D. 2009. The application of external knowledge: organizational conditions for exploration and exploitation. Journal of Management Studies. 46(3):482–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggiero, L. and Sevi, E. 2009. Opportunism by cheating and its effects on industry profitability. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory. Forthcoming Bromley, D.B. 1993. Reputation, image and impression management. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D.B. 2002. Comparing corporate reputations: league tables, quotients, benchmarks, or case studies? Corporate Reputation Review. 5(1):35–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K. 1986. An approach for relating social structure to cognitive structure. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 12:137–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K. 1989. The value of cognitive foundations for dynamic social theory. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 12:171–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K.M. and Lin, Z. 1997. A theoretical study of organizational performance under information distortion. Management Science. 43(7):976–997

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K.M. and Newell, A. 1994. The nature of the social agent. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 12:221–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K.M. and Prietula, M.J. (eds.) 1994. Computational organization theory. Hillsdale (NY): Lawrence Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlucci, D. and Schiuma, G. 2006. Knowledge asset value spiral: linking knowledge assets to company’s performance. Knowledge and Process Management. 13(1):35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caruana, A. 1997. Corporate reputation: concept and measurement. Journal of Product and Brand Management. 6(2):109–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatfield, D.C., Harrison, T.P. and Hayya, J.C. 2006. SISCO: an object-oriented supply chain simulation system. Decision Support System. 42:422–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. 1999. Decentralized supply chains subject to information delays. Management Science. 45(8):1076–1090

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. and Chen, Y. 2009. An Xml-based modular system analysis and design for supply chain simulation. Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing. 25:289–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F., Drezner, Z., Ryan, J.F. and Simchi-Levi, D. 2000. Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: the impact of forecasting, lead times and information. Management Science. 46(3):436–443

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. 2001. Trust: the fundamental bond in global collaboration. Organizational Dynamics. 29(4):274–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly. 35:128–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conte, R. and Paolucci, M. 2002. Reputation in artificial societies: social beliefs for social order. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. and March, J. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, K. and Johnson, G. 2002. On trees and triviality traps: locating the debate on the contribution of cognitive mapping to organizational research. Organization Studies. 23(1):73–81

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, G. and Nooteboom, B. 2000. The causal structure of long-term supply relationships. An empirical test of a generalized transaction cost theory. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Doney, P.M. and Cannon, J.P. 1997. An examination of trust in buyer-supplyer relationships. Journal of Marketing. 2:35–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. and Marengo, L. 2007. On the convergence of Evolutionary and Behavioral Theories of Organizations: a Tentative Roadmap. LEM Working Paper Series. 2007/01

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G., Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (eds.) 2000. The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities. Oxford: Oxford UP

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. 1992. On the nature of cognitive maps. Journal of Management Studies. 29(3):261–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espino-Rodriguez, T.F. and Padròn-Robaina, V. 2006. A review of outsourcing from the re sourcebased view of the firm. International Journal of Management Reviews. 8(1):49–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiol, C.M. and Huff, A.S. 1992. Maps for managers: where are we? Where do we go from here? Journal of Management Studies. 29(3):267–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C.J. 1996. Reputation: realizing value from the corporate image. Boston (MA): Harvard Business School Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C.J. 2006. Corporate Governance. Corporate Reputation Review, 8(4), pp. 267–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C.J. and Shanley, M. 1990. What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal. 33(2):233–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C.J. and Van Riel, C.B.M. 1997. The reputational landscape. Corporate Reputation Review. 1(1/2):5–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N.J. and Robertson, P.L. (eds.) 2000. Resources, technology and strategy: explorations in the resource-based perspective. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D. (ed.) 1988. Trust: making and breaking co-operative relations. Oxford: Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Germain, R., Claycomb, C. and Dröge, C. 2008. Supply chain variability, organizational structure, and performance: the moderating effect of demand unpredictability. Journal of Operations Management. 26:557–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, M.S. 1995. Being there: proximity, organization and culture in the development and adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies. Economic Geography. 71(1):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giardini F., Di Tosto, G. and Conte, R. (2008). A model for simulating reputation dynamics in industrial districts. Simulation Modelling Practices and Theory. 16:231–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N. 2008. Agent-based models. London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorobets, A. and Noteboom, B. 2004. Agent based computational model of trust. ERIM Report Series Research in Management. www.erim.eur.nl, www.ssrn.com

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.M. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal. 17:109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. 1998. Alliances and Networks. Strategic Management Journal. 19:293–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A.K., Smith, K.S., and Shalley, C.E. 2006. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal. 49(4):693–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J. and Schakenraad, J. 1994. The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. Strategic Management Journal. 15:291–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. 1992. The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal. 13(2):135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R.M. and Cockburn, I.M. 1994. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal. 15:63–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howells, J., James, A. and Malik, K. 2003. The sourcing of technological knowledge: distributed innovation processes and dynamic change. R&D Management. 33(4):395–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsuan Mikkola, J. 2003. Modularity, component outsourcing, and inter-firm learning. R&D Management. 33(4):439–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S.H., Sheoran, S.K. and Keskar, H. 2005. Computer-assisted supply chain configuration based on supply chain operations reference (SCOR) model. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 48:377–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, J. 1998. Trust and the transformation of supplier relations in Indian industry, in Lane, C. and Bachmann, R. (eds.) Trust within and between organizations (pp. 214–240). Oxford: Oxford UP

    Google Scholar 

  • Imrie, R. and Morris, J. 1992. A review of recent changes in buyer-supplier relations. Omega: International Journal of Management Science. 20:641–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klos, T.B. and Nooteboom B. 2001. Agent-based computational transaction cost economics. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control. 25:503–526

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R.M. and Tyler, T.R. (eds.) 1996. Trust in organizations: frontiers of theory and research. London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, C. 1995. The social constitution of supplier relations in Britain and Germany, in Withley, R. and Kristensen, P.H. (eds.) The changing European firm. London: Routledge, pp. 271–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, C. 2001. Organizational learning in supplier networks, in Dierkes, M., Antal, A.B., Child, J. and Nonaka, I. (eds.) Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge (pp. 699–715). Oxford: Oxford UP

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, C. and Bachmann, R. (eds.) 1998. Trust within and between organizations. Oxford: Oxford UP

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, C. and Bachmann, R. 1996. The social constitution of trust: supplier relations in Britain and Germany. Organization Studies. 17(3):365–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R.N. and Everett, M.J. 1994. What is Evolutionary Economics, in Magnusson, L. (ed.) Evolutionary and neo-schumpeterian approaches to economics. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.L., Padmanabhan, V. and Whang, S. 1997. Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect. Management Science. 43(4):546–558

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, D. and March, J.G. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal. 14:95–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Vanhaverbeke, W. and Schoenmakers, W. 2008. Exploration and exploitation in innovation: reframing the interpretation. Creativity and Innovation Management. 17(2):107–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Z. and Li, D. 2003. Does competency-based trust benefit organizational performance: a meso exploration using computer modelling. Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 27:219–261

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, F., Sung, Y. and Lo Y. 2005. Effects of trust mechanisms on supply-chain performance: a multi-agent simulation study. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 9(4):91–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomi, A., Larsen, E.R. 2001. Introduction, in Lomi, A. and Larsen, E.R. (eds.) Dynamics of organizations: computational modeling and organization theories. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp. 3–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Longo, F. and Mirabelli G. 2008. An advanced supply chain management tool based on modeling and simulation. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 54:570–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmberg, A. and Power, D. 2005. (How) do (firms in) clusters create knowledge? Industry and Innovation. 12:409–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. 1988. Decisions and Organizations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. 1991. Exploration and Exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science. 2:71–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. 1997. “Understanding How Decisions Happens in Organizations”, in Shapira, Z. (ed.) Organizational Decision Making (pp. 9–34). Cambridge (MA): Cambridge UP

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M.D., Green, J.R. 1995. Microeconomic Theory. New York: Oxford University Press

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Maskell, P. 2001a. Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster. Industrial and Corporate Change. 10:919–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskell, P. 2001b. Knowledge creation and diffusion in geographical clusters. International Journal of Innovation Management. 5:213–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason-Jones, R. and Towill, D.R. 1998. Time compression inn the supply chain: information management is the vital ingredient. Logistics Information Management. 11(2):93–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason-Jones, R. and Towill, D.R. 1999. Total cycle time compression and the agile supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics. 62:61–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. 1979. The Structuring of Organization. NY: Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, J. and Speckman, R.E. 1994. Characteristics of partnership success: partnership attributes, communication behaviour, and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic Management Journal. 15:135–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, N.A., Zou, S., Vorhies, D.W. and Katsikeas, C.S. 2003. Experiential and informational knowledge, architectural marketing capabilities, and the adaptive performance of export ventures: a cross national study. Decision Sciences. 34(2):287–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D.C., Oxley, J.E. and Silverman, B.S. 1996. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal. 17:77–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge. Organization Science. 5:14–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olhager, J. and Selldin, E. 2004. Supply chain management survey of Swedish manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Economics. 89:353–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. 1987. International patterns of technological accumulation, in Vahne, J.E. (ed.) Strategies in global competition. London: Croom Helm

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. 1985. Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. NY: The Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W.W., Koput, K.M. and Smith-Doerr, L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly. 41:116–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prietula, M. 2001. Advice, trust and gossip among artificial agents, in Lomi, A. and Larsen, E.R. (eds.) Dynamics of organizations: computational modeling and organization theories (pp. 141–181). Cambridge MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddalls, C.E., Icasati-Johanson, B., Axtell, C.M., Bennet, S. and Clegg, C. 2002. Quantifying the effects of trust in supply chains during promotional periods. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications. 5(3):257–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzello, S. 2003. Introduction: towards a cognitive evolutionary economics, in Rizzello, S. (ed.) Cognitive developments in economics (pp. 1–19). London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sako, M. 1998. Does trust improve business performance?, in Lane, C. and Bachmann, R. (eds.) Trust within and between organizations. Oxford: Oxford UP, pp. 88–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. 1991. Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science. 2/1: 125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. 1997. Models of Bounded Rationality, vol. 3: Empirically Grounded Economic Reason. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G.J. 1961. The Economics of Information. Journal of Political Economy. 69 (3):213–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E. 1987. Learning to learn localized learning and technological progress, in Dasgupta, P. and Stoneman, P. (eds.) Economic policy and technical performance. Cambridge: Cambridge UP

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M. and Venables, A.J. 2004. Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography. 4(4):351–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, R. (ed.) 2005. Cognition and multi-agent interaction: from cognitive modelling to social virtual experiment. Cambridge: Cambridge UP

    Google Scholar 

  • Swafford, P.M., Ghosh, S. and Murthy, N. 2006. The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: scale development and model testing. Journal of Operations Management. 24:170–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, J. 1997. Using cognitive mapping in management research: decisions about technical innovation. British Journal of Management. 8:183–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallman, S., Jenkins, M., Henry, N. and Pinch, S. 2004. Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review. 29:258–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K.C. 2001. A framework of supply chain management literature. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management. 7:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K.C., Kannan, V.R., Handfield, R.B. and Ghosh, S. 1999. Supply chain management: an empirical study of its impact on performance. International Journal of Operations and Production Management. 19(10):1034–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tykhonov, D., Jonker, C. Xmeijer, S. and Verwaart, T. 2008. Agent-based simulation of the trust and tracing game for supply chains and networks. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation. 11(3):3–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, M. 2002. Supply system structure, management and performance: a conceptual model. International Journal of Management Reviews. 4(4):353–369

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications. NY: The Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1981. The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Costs Approach, American Journal of Sociology. 87:548–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. NY: The Free Press Exploration Modes and Its Impact on Industry Profitability 115

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1994. Transaction cost economics and organization theory, in Smelser, N.J. and Swedberg, R. (eds.) The handbook of economic sociology (pp. 77–107). Princeton (NJ): Princeton UP

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1996. The Mechanisms of Governance. NY: Oxford UP

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, U. 1993. Evolutionary economics. London: Edward Elgar

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A., McEvily, B. and Perrone, V. 1998. Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust in performance. Organization Science. 9(2):141–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S.A. and George, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review. 27:185–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, H. and Benton Jr., D.C. 2007. Supply chain practice and information sharing. Journal of Operations management. 25:1348–1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zook, M. A. 2004. The knowledge brokers: venture capitalists, tacit knowledge and regional development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 28:621–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this paper

Cite this paper

Biggiero, L. (2010). Exploration Modes and Its Impact on Industry Profitability. In: Faggini, M., Vinci, C.P. (eds) Decision Theory and Choices: a Complexity Approach. New Economic Windows. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1778-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics